10

Public Education is evil because...

Posted by j_IR1776wg 11 years, 7 months ago to Education
365 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

I'll start.

Public Education is evil because it assumes that parents are too stupid or too lazy to educate their children and, therefore, the State must compel them to do so.

Your thoughts?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 10.
  • Posted by $ johnrobert2 11 years, 7 months ago
    Clamshells? What clamshells? I was too busy dancin' an' jammin', mon.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    we said "glack, glack"
    you know, last newsletter day some Objectivist came in here and tore my house post to shreds, which was kinda the point of the post, but then all the comments and likened himself to the farmer in the dell. he wraps up his big arrogant point by saying the bone stands alone.
    what a cheese
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I prefer to be around people who have a panda's understanding of good grammar, too, but if wishes were fishes, then women....no, that's not gonna work.

    take 2: I prefer to be around people who have a panda's understanding of good grammar, [NO, THIS IS NOT A SLAM AT YOUR GRAMMAR SKILLS. OR ANYONE ELSE'S] but I don't get it very often. sigh.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "My conclusion? Public education is killing off our best and brightest, and it's not by accident"

    Brilliant conclusion. The schools are crushing Reason one little mind at a time on purpose..


    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ johnrobert2 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hey, I remember seeing all those in the original b&w on Sat mornings. You young whippersnappers have no respect for your elders, esp when it comes to the deprivations we suffered.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ...went the little green frog one day...glub glub went the little green frog! (Ope sorry... I slipped back into my church camp campfire song days.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    or to - maybe - somehow - find yourself a dead-end job where you don't make enough money to pay taxes? hmmmm.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Wonky 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Federal government. I suppose if I had made that clear in my original comment, it might have eliminated some of the drama. /sigh
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you for not wanting to spend my money. However, I have no choice but to pay taxes for education or go to jail.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ummm, I take issue with paragraph 7 -
    by definition, a public school is financed by the public [that's the government] which means its curriculum is skewed.
    Call them "city schools" if you want - if they're financed with taxes, they are tainted from the very beginning.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Do you mean "a federal issue" like "make a big deal about" or like "an issue for the federal government"?
    The federal government certainly has MADE it their issue.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The way we dealt with after-school care [remember, I worked at a private school for smart kids] was that parents paid for it; at least an hour and a half was "work time" for students; and it ended at 6 PM. If you were late picking up your kid, you owed the day-care person who stayed $1 per minute, payable in cash on the spot. But the parents I knew had already self-selected the school.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Huzzah!!! but you forgot the free breakfast, too, and the hand-wringing "how will those kids get fed during the summer, or on vacation?"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That was ME drumming my fingers!

    disclaimer: I have no source handy for the following because all my "teacher books" are packed and won't be unpacked until I can do it without crying.

    By most measures, "gifted" [read smart] begins at about 135 on the Stanford-Binet. About 2% of the population falls above that 135.
    ASIDE: Like any test, the further you get away from the middle, the less accurate the test is. The biggie is the Four Sigma - they take the top 2% of that top 2%, and they do their own testing. I understood the questions, but couldn't answer them!

    So, we have the "smart population" being 2% of the total population.
    For the population of teenagers who try to or do commit suicide, 50% are smart.

    My conclusion? Public education is killing off our best and brightest, and it's not by accident.

    It is assumed by most educational institutions for the general public that the smart kids will get along, so we don't have to worry about them - and they do get used as "mini-teachers". Most of the smart kids I taught learned NOTHING academic during High School. One reported to me "It's tough - I can do no work, and get an A, or do 5 hours of work, learn something, and get the same A. Nobody cares but me."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Wonky 11 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think the fact that I was referring to my county property tax got lost in the heat of things.

    I don't want to spend your money, and I certainly don't think public education is a federal issue.

    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo