Well it's a FACT that Islam is for killing anyone that doesn't do their bidding. It's a FACT That they kill in massive numbers their own people It's a FACT that they kill without mercy and in horribly barbaric ways women and children. Christians have done the same thing I would suggest all but one possibly two have done the same thing of the monothestic religions so excuse me if I don't get all weepy eyed for Islam because it fails to have a religious religion with a God and all that as the what is the prerequisite for slaughtering and feel no compunctions at providing the fly swatter technique to control what is nothing more than flys bothering my picnic.

I prescribe the same treatment for any brand of fly and give them zero excuse be they secular or religious or whatever and do not excuse in the present the actions of the past. The past is not my responsibility. The present is my responsibility.

Should they wish to slaughter each other no problem but I would move to remove those not of a lemming religion that find themselves in their way.

Immigrants from Islam? When their are any number of non islamics being denied sanctuary? You got to be kidding me. Allow the importation of flies to my picnic when their human beings who should be sitting at my table? Physician heal thyself.

This administration has a lot to answer for and they are not invited to my picnic nor are their pestilent friends.

My prescription is solve the problem at home and swat our own flies. Religious or Secular.

And while we're at it get rid of the draft laws. They are in place precisely to assist our own flies.

The ante to counter that is 24 plus as cannon fodder and not in the GD pentagon.

For those who have gone through this before I apologize for having to swat a few flies it's an ongoing operation. If you got a bit lost the genesis is in the discussion on capital punishment. One does not execute expecting change. One executes to remove a serious enough threat to society that is prone to continue being a threat or shown to have a predilection or penchant for such activity. One does not excuse them nor try to retrain, etc etc etc.nor bother with caging them or even remove some physical characteristic such as by spraying although that does work where population control of flies is concerned. One simply decides that society having decided flies are worthy of execution for the crime of bothering picnics and other antisocial behavior to swat them.

I don't care about flies in Afghanistan or Syria. But I do feel compassion for humans being likewise bothered and would spend the time and money to secure for them a fly free picnic and disease free safe spot somewhere in the world more hospitable with a good supply of Black Flag or H24. I'm not so sure the USA is a safe spot these days what with it's heavily overtaxed entry fee and not much to offer these days in exchange.

As for the rest I and I wager you cannot recall the name of the last fly I executed at the behest of social convention and my own good common sense. Nor could I imagine stopping to let that bit of information or lack thereof become a concern.

The Bahai's, Christians, Druze, and others in Syria for example being denied entry to sanctuary (USA) while flies (Islamics) are being allowed in and not vetted properly goes beyond the pale.Include any other beleaguered category religious or secular except those who are other forms of flies. National or International in their socialist fly suits. Who gets in? The flies the picknickers are denied entry and left to an Islamic slaughter house.

Whose worse? Islamics or those that support them Why here's a group of the latter ...running for office again.

Hebrew prior to that Aramaic prior to that some local tribal dialect no doubt.

Hebrew after that Greek Classical, Latin and the main root languages which make up English - Germanic, Latin, and several others.

One of my Uncles a retired Dentist and Missionary did a study and determined he was shocked the different books stayed as intact in meaning as they seem to have done even when watered down with the 'missing books which are not missing' but watered down more so by the development of English as the worlds major sponge language along with it's companion loss of purity in what little exactness it did have.

I am glad you used the correct translation of that. You are indeed 100% correct. "Thou shalt not kill, is properly translated "Thou shall not Murder"

Not many people are actually aware of that nor willing to actually use the original hebrew.

Not all killing is senseless nor proscribed by religion. The Christian Relgion bans in it's basic ten rules "Thou Shalt Not Commit Murder." The word killing is not part of that sentence and another part of their Book states "God reserves to the people the right to kill in defense ....and another long list.." The verb use is accurate the list is not except for defense. Another I suppose religious version of a false socialist definition

Ironically senseless killing is not the sole claim of religion, but more of a seriously flawed ideology. Socialism and Communism being devoid of religion has a flawed ideology that is at the root of massive horrors.

Claims are not facts...Hitler can claim all he wants that did not make it fact. So you have Atheists, killing far more people than Christians, I am referring to your Lenin reference and the deaths brought about by Socialists and Communists all of which are conveniently devoid of religion and promote the absence thereof.

Your welcome. Neither can the socialist system even with a driver.

Nor that tells Christians to kill other Christians. One of the few differences perhaps between International and National Socialism. Hitler and crony's claimed Christianity more often than not. Lenin and cronies rejected all religions.

When the UN Vote was taken there were two forms of Yes.One with recognition and one without but both favoring partition or maybe the other way around. I"m trying to track that down. Which ever I recall the US took the easy way out. Stand byi....

it cannot not be a group effort. You will notice how many corporates spend time as academics and both spend time in government appointed offices. "Althouogh the founding fathers of modern day socialism refer to the three branches ad business leaders, government leaders and labor leaders I refer to them as corporate statists or statis corpororatists primarily. Think of them as a penny farthing bicycle. The large wheel is statist/corporatist/labor. The smaller wheel is corporatist /statist/labor. The kick stand are the major labor leaders. Rarely seen in business circles and business circles at least openly they sometimes act in academic circles. Robert Reich is one example.

The former Secretary of Treasury from Goldman Sachs not only engineered the Mexican Tesorobono bailout by raiding Railroad Retirement Funds and Social Security funds he did so full well knowing behind his blind trust fund managers knew about his connection with Goldman Sachs as a still paid employ, as a stock holder, and 'Goldman Sachs major position in the Mexican funds collapse. They basically refused to pay since the previous leaders had stolen all the funds. The sick part this bailout was done openly in full view of an uncaring media and uncaring public. The dude made millions at taxpayer expense.His personal wealth and thast of GS made millions and multi millions.

This latest scam was very patrotic thinking of three corner or tricorn hats. One corner was Senator Dodds, Rep. Francks and others and the US Appointed managers of Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac. All millionaires and unlike Wrangel paid their taxes and went on with life happy. The third corner leaving housing bubble scams behind was/is agricorps/powercorps and the ethanol scam. with some auto industry in their reaping the lions share of benefits. the third corner was banking as big big banks got rid of seemingly hundreds of very small banks thorugh government edict changes in their retired operting procedures.
Conspiracy? Only in that it was the largest theft of taxpayer funds ever engineered and did not included military production for once. Conspiracy.? It was right out in the open and cast as patriotic.

Conspiracy? Hillary made hay while the sun shined brightly her opponent Donny Boy the same using the rules available to big business while his employees especially in the trades unions paid through the nose in devalued money.

Mayans the other side of the world ... The one on the east side was due to the Tower of Babel. When the resulting fall produced a lot of curiously rap like sound Someone said That's a lot of sxxt and someone else said. You can't say that some might be offended. They allythought a moment and said 'crap!' and those afflicted were enduring a form of talking in tongues known as the crapture. Sounded a lot better but but wiser heads prevaiilded and said, babble then it will also mean political speech.

The city cheered and scattered to the four winds and spread the word. From now on it's PC for political crap.

But how will we tell it from any other form of speech?

Simple it's a three part dis harmony be the happening of boring bass runs, even more boring drum licks and straight up fesces but use the four letter version.

OK runs, licks and frijoles.

Whcih makes iperfect sense to Tejanos.

Babylonians
Zero was invented independently by the Babylonians, Mayans and Indians (although some researchers say the Indian number system was influenced by the Babylonians). The Babylonians got their number system from the Sumerians, the first people in the world to develop a counting system.Jun 28, 2013
Who Invented Zero? - Live Science
www.livescience.com/27853-who-invente...
Feedback
About this result •
Zero - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_(numb...
By 130 AD, Ptolemy, influenced by Hipparchus and the Babylonians, was using a symbol for zero (a small circle with a long overbar) in his work on mathematical astronomy called the Syntaxis Mathematica, also known as the Almagest.
‎Zero (disambiguation) · ‎1 (number) · ‎Parity of zero · ‎Tetraneutron

It was a whole lot of nothing! Hit it Jerry Lee!

Defending from or even attacking some is, as Tom Clancy wrote a matter of degrees. War is armed robbery writ large. Mugging is a mini war writ small.

The only difference, sometimes, is enemies domestic and enemies foreign began their criminal careers in different segments of the world with a different out look than the rest of us AND are treated in two different ways. As bona fide citizens and as bona fide foreigners is the first instance of differences. The second instance is wearing a uniform of a recognized foreign power or not.

Wearing a uniform such as gang banger clothes burkas does not impart any special treatment it is the bona fide membership and allegiance to the recognized foreign power AND the uniform which allows possible treatment under certain conventions and rules of warfare and the lack of such membership regardless of apparel that requires treatment in a different legal manner. Cartel or mafia 'soldiers' for example. Weathermen such as Ayers is another.

Clear and present dangers such as the Jihadists, the cartel dopers, internal traitors, and violators of the Constitution may be able to trade on their special status and often do. A professorship at a university or as an elected official are two examples,

Introducing or seeking to introduce a Weapon of Mass Destruction such as...heroin - the act and the intent - can be a civil crime regardless of citizen status or an international crime the act of a uniformed employee of a recognized foreign government.

US military are subjected to intensive training in Geneva Convention, Laws of Land Warfare, Status of Forces Agreements, Rules of Engagement and other training. Then find out some are wink and grin and disregard laws. The laws on human traffic one clear and blatant example.The behind the scenes training given by dedicated officers, non-commissioned is which can and should be ignored (some), which cannot be ignored (some), to what extent our country will back it's troops in given situations if participating comes to light (no extent.)

The junior enlisted and lower ranks of officers, non-commission and commissioned can expect to be abandoned. The senior grades swept under a rug. Better than most we are not perfect. A recent movie detailed on instance of that which is not uncommon. An instance all too familiar to among others police officers find themselves. The answer is protect each other because the senior people and the government and the people do NOT care.

Are there extenuating circumstances? Certainly. As an uneducated semi literate in the home county language but fluent in Nahuatl seeking a better condition in life and one whose sole concern is their family I might look upon them more favorably than a soldier but both are members of an invasion force. Even though both are often coerced.

But at the same time not look favorably on members of our own government who aid and abet that invasion or transport of weaons of mass destruction.

Whose more the criminal? The indio from Yucatan or the immigration official and justice department official who routinely put both of the offenders back on the street? Or the senior officials who set that policy? Or the citizens that elect those senior officials?

I submit that those at senior levels who sanction or demand certain actions are just as guilty as the cartel, the jihad, the home grown terrorist including the street corner banger as the actual doer. I care not that their criminal act was misprision or 'under color of office.' Such as the former and present Attorney Generals and especially those who act perform these acts in a racist, sexist, or bigoted manner.

Are neophytes such as Trump going to grant blanket amnesty and pardons for those that carry out their popular and in demand orders? Perhaps the Donald will do a Obeyme tap dance and excuse all participants in some action deemed necessary. if we expect citizens to back executive actions we should be willing to support them in that expectation and not turn progressive when the NY Times and Washington Post start the inevitable witch hunt.

Think about it;. Huffington isn't after Bush she's after you. To her it's a chance to retrain your thinking and weaken your resolve. She doesn't care the hue and cry about WMD in Iraq was specious she only cares to destroy those who are expected, at a critical moment, to look the other way.

Think about it.