How I discovered Ayn Rand and Objectivism – My personal story
Posted by Maphesdus 11 years ago to Philosophy
It's difficult to say for certain when I was first introduced to Ayn Rand. For the longest time, “Atlas Shrugged” had always been one of those famous literary works, like “To Kill a Mockingbird” or “Catcher in the Rye,” which I knew were considered classics, but which I had never read and didn't know much about. Ayn Rand's magnum opus was among these, and it sort floated around in my subconscious, just below the level of awareness; existing, but in a state which was incorporeal and insubstantial.
One day, I was watching an episode of South Park titled “Chickenlover,” in which the character Officer Barbrady reveals that he is illiterate, but subsequently learns to read, and then reads “Atlas Shrugged” and decides never to read again because of it. This little cameo nudged “Atlas Shrugged” into my consciousness a bit more, and made me decide that perhaps maybe I wanted to possibly read it someday. I didn't know what the story was even about, but if it was getting made fun of on South Park, it had to be kind of a big deal, right? So I made a mental goal to eventually read “Atlas Shrugged” at some unspecified point in the indeterminate future. Then I went about my regular life as usual and soon forgot about it.
In 2009, I took a summer-sales job selling home security systems door-to-door. The company was sending sales-reps out of state, so I got to visit a part of the country I had never been to before. On the way there, during a layover between flights (tickets paid for by the company), I decided to browse the used book store at the airport. On one shelf there happened to be an old hardcover copy of “Atlas Shurgged.” I eagerly picked it up and read the brief synopsis on the back cover, which gave me a glimpse into a world on the brink of economic collapse. It sounded intriguing, and so I began flipping through the pages. Being somewhat impatient, I flipped towards the back of the book to see what state the world would end up in. Had the characters in the book solved the economic problems of their society? Had things fallen apart completely? What did their world look like? By pure chance, I happened to land on what turned out to be one of the most memorable exchanges of dialogue in the entire book:
––––––––––––––––––––––
“Okay, I'll tell you. You want me to be Economic Dictator?”
“Yes!”
“And you'll obey any order I give?”
“Implicitly!”
“Then start by abolishing all income taxes.”
“Oh no!” screamed Mr. Thompson, leaping to his feet. “We couldn't do that! That's . . . that's not the field of production. That's the field of distribution. How would we pay government employees?"
“Fire your government employees.”
“Oh, no! That's politics! That's not economics! You can't interfere with politics! You can't have everything!”
––––––––––––––––––––––
So... this was a novel about politics and economics? I smiled. This was in May of 2009, and the country was still feeling the effects of the 2008 financial crisis, so the story felt absolutely relevant to the current times. Unfortunately, I was flat broke, and didn't want to spend what little cash I had on a book, even if it did look like it would be a really good one. Looking at my watch, I realized my next plane was going to be departing soon, and I had only about ten minutes or so to get to the terminal. So I put “Atlas Shrugged” back on the shelf and walked out of the bookstore. It would be another three years before I finally picked it up again.
I spent that summer involved in what I had initially thought was going to be just another job to pay the bills, but which, looking back, I now realize taught me some very important life lessons. It was the first sales job I had ever had, and it gave me a totally new perspective on salesmen, business, and money. I admit I didn't do particularly well at the job, as I've always been an extremely shy and introverted person, and had a habit of being a bit submissive (when you're a salesman, these are not good personality traits to have).
Of course I wasn't the only one who was struggling. Many of the other sales reps also found they had significant difficulty in persuading people to buy our product. Taking note of our struggles, our team leader (who had done extremely well with sales in summers past) introduced us to a book which he said would help us overcome our weaknesses. That book was called “The Psychology of Selling,” by Brian Tracy. I didn't know it yet, but this book was going to have a profound impact on my life and my perspective on business and money. It was the first time in my life that I had ever read any self-help book, or any book that dealt directly with the issues of money, sales, and business. It was amazing. Although I admit my skills as a salesman didn't improve much, Brian Tracy's book started me on a journey of financial discovery, a quest to discover the inner workings of business, finance, and eventually, economics.
Following that summer, I started to develop a keen interest in money matters, and I began to actively seek out other self-help books on the subject. Over the next couple of years, I delved into various books like “Rich Dad, Poor Dad,” by Robert Kiyosaki, “Super Rich,” by Russell Simmons, “Think and Grow Rich,” and “The Law of Success,” both by Napoleon Hill, and “How to Win Friends & Influence People,” by Dale Carnegie, along with several others. Combined, these books taught me to think about business and money in a totally new light. They taught me that rather than slaving away for a paycheck at some mindless dead-end job where I would have little control over my own life, I could choose a different path – I could choose freedom. These books taught me that personal success, economic prosperity, and true financial independence were simply a matter of having the proper mindset, of understanding how to create and build real value. I still had not yet read “Atlas Shrugged,” but these other books had established in me a value system based on the principles of independence, personal responsibility, humility, productivity, and financial freedom. I was beginning to think like an entrepreneur.
[CONTINUED IN COMMENTS]
One day, I was watching an episode of South Park titled “Chickenlover,” in which the character Officer Barbrady reveals that he is illiterate, but subsequently learns to read, and then reads “Atlas Shrugged” and decides never to read again because of it. This little cameo nudged “Atlas Shrugged” into my consciousness a bit more, and made me decide that perhaps maybe I wanted to possibly read it someday. I didn't know what the story was even about, but if it was getting made fun of on South Park, it had to be kind of a big deal, right? So I made a mental goal to eventually read “Atlas Shrugged” at some unspecified point in the indeterminate future. Then I went about my regular life as usual and soon forgot about it.
In 2009, I took a summer-sales job selling home security systems door-to-door. The company was sending sales-reps out of state, so I got to visit a part of the country I had never been to before. On the way there, during a layover between flights (tickets paid for by the company), I decided to browse the used book store at the airport. On one shelf there happened to be an old hardcover copy of “Atlas Shurgged.” I eagerly picked it up and read the brief synopsis on the back cover, which gave me a glimpse into a world on the brink of economic collapse. It sounded intriguing, and so I began flipping through the pages. Being somewhat impatient, I flipped towards the back of the book to see what state the world would end up in. Had the characters in the book solved the economic problems of their society? Had things fallen apart completely? What did their world look like? By pure chance, I happened to land on what turned out to be one of the most memorable exchanges of dialogue in the entire book:
––––––––––––––––––––––
“Okay, I'll tell you. You want me to be Economic Dictator?”
“Yes!”
“And you'll obey any order I give?”
“Implicitly!”
“Then start by abolishing all income taxes.”
“Oh no!” screamed Mr. Thompson, leaping to his feet. “We couldn't do that! That's . . . that's not the field of production. That's the field of distribution. How would we pay government employees?"
“Fire your government employees.”
“Oh, no! That's politics! That's not economics! You can't interfere with politics! You can't have everything!”
––––––––––––––––––––––
So... this was a novel about politics and economics? I smiled. This was in May of 2009, and the country was still feeling the effects of the 2008 financial crisis, so the story felt absolutely relevant to the current times. Unfortunately, I was flat broke, and didn't want to spend what little cash I had on a book, even if it did look like it would be a really good one. Looking at my watch, I realized my next plane was going to be departing soon, and I had only about ten minutes or so to get to the terminal. So I put “Atlas Shrugged” back on the shelf and walked out of the bookstore. It would be another three years before I finally picked it up again.
I spent that summer involved in what I had initially thought was going to be just another job to pay the bills, but which, looking back, I now realize taught me some very important life lessons. It was the first sales job I had ever had, and it gave me a totally new perspective on salesmen, business, and money. I admit I didn't do particularly well at the job, as I've always been an extremely shy and introverted person, and had a habit of being a bit submissive (when you're a salesman, these are not good personality traits to have).
Of course I wasn't the only one who was struggling. Many of the other sales reps also found they had significant difficulty in persuading people to buy our product. Taking note of our struggles, our team leader (who had done extremely well with sales in summers past) introduced us to a book which he said would help us overcome our weaknesses. That book was called “The Psychology of Selling,” by Brian Tracy. I didn't know it yet, but this book was going to have a profound impact on my life and my perspective on business and money. It was the first time in my life that I had ever read any self-help book, or any book that dealt directly with the issues of money, sales, and business. It was amazing. Although I admit my skills as a salesman didn't improve much, Brian Tracy's book started me on a journey of financial discovery, a quest to discover the inner workings of business, finance, and eventually, economics.
Following that summer, I started to develop a keen interest in money matters, and I began to actively seek out other self-help books on the subject. Over the next couple of years, I delved into various books like “Rich Dad, Poor Dad,” by Robert Kiyosaki, “Super Rich,” by Russell Simmons, “Think and Grow Rich,” and “The Law of Success,” both by Napoleon Hill, and “How to Win Friends & Influence People,” by Dale Carnegie, along with several others. Combined, these books taught me to think about business and money in a totally new light. They taught me that rather than slaving away for a paycheck at some mindless dead-end job where I would have little control over my own life, I could choose a different path – I could choose freedom. These books taught me that personal success, economic prosperity, and true financial independence were simply a matter of having the proper mindset, of understanding how to create and build real value. I still had not yet read “Atlas Shrugged,” but these other books had established in me a value system based on the principles of independence, personal responsibility, humility, productivity, and financial freedom. I was beginning to think like an entrepreneur.
[CONTINUED IN COMMENTS]
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Unicorns aren't bad... they just don't exist.
Whether the government ceases to pass/enforce such laws is another matter.
Okay, if 100 stories tall buildings is the trigger for having building codes... how come we have building codes for single-story ranch-style houses?
for that matter your example of not having building and zoning codes at the time of the founders neglects to mention that at that time we didn't build buildings 100 stories high.
Fred
Fred
Nevertheless, we are a a nation of laws and if you disagree with those laws as I do in some cases decided by the Supreme Court, we have an obligation to persuade our legislators to pass constitutional laws to change things. I too often wonder whether our Congress has ever read the constitution and for that matter I wonder the same about the supreme court at times. However that doesn't change the fact that we must either obey the law or institute a revolution. Not quite what I would suggest at this moment in time.
Fred
A very interesting story, I am not sure I understand the reference to "rent seeking" does it refer to inspectors trying to be bribed or what?
Thanks,
Fred
Maybe they sent you here to undermine Rand's vision of everyone following a group's catechism of beliefs.
Sorry for the snark. I have this crazy fear that one day I'll discover Common Core actually was a complex conspiracy and annoying worksheets were just the beginning.
I must say that I have never quite seen the mixing of principles, laws or presumed rights as I do in your writings. If you didn't intend to be insulting, then I must congratulate you on your accidental abilities. For that matter, sometimes you write sentences that leave their meaning unclear. For example, “I disagree with the statement that with freedom come responsibilities at least on the governmental/political level.”
Are you referring to the fact that politicians have no understanding or regard for that principle? If so, then I agree. To me, free speech is absolute, with the exception of yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire.
It all boils down to the fact that you are arguing about an indefensible position that zoning and building codes are unconstitutional.
Fred
Well, you have finally succeeded in attempting to insult me with you calling me a liberal. When the name calling begins, it's a sure sign that you're loosing the argument.
Sir, there are few people out there that could be considered more conservative than I, on the other hand that doesn't mean that I should be blind to reality.
To be blunt, for you to inject “natural rights” into an argument that you should be free to ignore engineering principles, uncorrupted zoning laws, and building codes can be ignored by you is one of the most arrogant statements I've ever read.
How your reference to health care enter into this argument where one group is expected to pay for another group is a puzzle to me. However, it's probably the only point of agreement we will ever reach, at least in this string.
However, as to your claim that I'm misusing the word “rights,” it's another point of proof of your illusions about what natural rights mean.
Fewer insults and more logic and common sense might be of help on your part.
Fred
Speaking of being ignorant, your sentence, “Common law has nuisance law and it has covenants running with the land,” makes no sense in the English language.
I agree with you about the part that government creating zoning laws is a question not totally resolved. Courts, however, have ruled consistently that zoning laws are legal and if you disagree, you are free to attempt to appeal such laws.
However one of the purposes of zoning laws is to protect the property owners,e.g. residential areas being invaded by industrial buildings next door. It kind of goes with the example I used in a previous post of the right of you to swing your fist stops at the end of my nose.
You continue your condescending attitude instead of addressing the various points offered as counter arguments.
Sadly, when arriving at such a point, it's best to agree to disagree and perhaps let other readers of these post decide.
Fred
It seems impossible to help some people to understand first of all that they are not necessarily the smartest person on earth and that they must do their best to be condescending to others during a debate. Not the best way to be persuasive.
For example to imply that I don't know the difference between engineering principles and building codes is pretty insulting, especially when it is crystal clear that I do know the difference if you made any effort at all to read what is in front of you.
I, unlike you, understand the need for considering engineering principles when writing building codes which are clearly legal and in fact one of the few legislative responsibilities assigned to state legislators by their state constitutions.
I would be willing to wager that the vast majority of the voting public would be in favor of building codes. That there is often insider dealing and corruption in that process there is little doubt. I'm talking about legitimate building codes.
With freedom come responsibilities to the public. Your right to swing your fist, stops at the end of my nose. It is impossible to build anything that does not at one time or another anything built by anyone will be in contact by an innocent bystander.
If you build a coffee pot and invite a neighbor a cup of coffe and the pot blows up and possibly injures your neighbor there is liability. So small or large, when a product is built competent knowledge is necessary.
Fred
And no, I have not read "We The Living." I have only watched the movie. It's a great movie, and I have no doubt that the book is better. That's almost always the case with book-to-film adaptations. I've been meaning to read it, but I got caught up with other reading, and it sort of got pushed to the wayside. I should have time to read it this summer though, and I'll be sure to let you know what I think.
You say you lived through a Communist takeover? Which country, exactly?
And if I was a shill, who would I be a shill for, and what possible motive could I have? Please tell me all about the wild and fantastic conspiracy theories you've imagined about me. I would love to hear them. :)
www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts/1c88be/wa...
I think you wrote an emotional and very superficial piece here. Totally absurd, incredibly valid and similar over the top characterizations do not belong in these discussions. I find offensive your misrepresentations of Ayn Rand's thoughts and writings. It is you that is renting not she. Have you read the "We the Living"? I can tell you that the Italian movie is a very weak sheddow of the novel. Ayn Rand was adamantly and bluntly attacking any oppressive government, no matter which "...ist" or "...ism" is attached to their, ususally imadequate and obfuscating labels. I lived through a communist takeover and murderous establishment of that kind of tiranny. I have never found a better description of it than in that novel of Rand's.
As you observed, communists that find it inconvenient to call themselves that, call themselves progressive liberals or variations of that.
My impression is that you have a lot of maturing to do and I wish you good luck with that.
I saw, in another piece you wrote, call somebody stupid or an expression to that effect. Please try to refrain from that. It diminishes you greatly.
By the way, it is called ad hominem and it is a Latin expression, while homonym is a linguistic term.
http://www.alternet.org/story/145819/ayn...
Like others have said, though, it's probable that Ames may have been exaggerating or distorting Ayn Rand's journal entries, so the article should be viewed with heavy skepticism.
As for a left leaning libertarian supposedly being a complete contradiction to a classical liberal, can you explain to me what the difference is between a libertarian and a classical liberal?
Is that what this site is for, people who enjoy movies? I rather thought this site was oriented toward people who have an interest in Ayn Rand. In writing dozens of comments here I've mentioned two movies, but don't remember anyone else commenting on movies. Maybe I haven't explored far enough.
I'm not sure what a troll is, or is meant to do, but using an aging term for someone meant to distract or deceive the public, I believe Maphesdus is a shill, defeated simply and easily by ignoring him. No loss. There are plenty of interesting people on this site with ideas worth reading.
For instance, there is no such thing as a right to health care, because that means someone has to be a slave to provide it. Do not misuse the word Rights like liberals do.
Load more comments...