- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
So why isn't the admittedly uber-liberal media going ape shit over the former President influencing the election that would determine his successor?
Oh wait, never mind. I keep forgetting that the ends justify any means proggies use to accomplish their goals.
The "swamp" mentality has been the standard in DC and in Gov for a long time. I had a friend who was a nice guy until he ran and was elected to Congress. He changed from one day to another. He said he went there to "do good". But was soon educated that "no, no, you are in this for yourself". Forget who elected you and representing them.
It is an existential issue so no surprise they are defending it tooth and nail. Specifically, because they have no alternative course other then dropping off the grid.
Trump was not elected for Sainthood or for being the Messiah Obama never was. He was elected to do a job that needs to be done before this nation crashes and burns. Those who have the most to lose are in full blown fear that he alone will expose the ills of many previous administrations and right this ship. He is alone except for US and there has never been a time in my 66 years when our elected leader needed us more. I could never pull a lever for any democrat and hate myself when ever I pull a lever for a RINO but I will do my part to maintain the majorities in both houses as long as Trump is at the helm. All of this blather about meddling and collusion is just that, BLATHER. Trump stepped out of the lap of luxury to do a job that needs to be done and I don't much give a shit about his ulterior motives. He turned his life and that of his entire family to pure shit for US and we ought to damn well appreciate it because I can't think of another politician who has ever done what he is doing. The man is swimming up shit river through thousands of turds and gaining for us all. It is all about the numbers folks and if you can't add then just look at the numbers because we have never in my life seen them better.
Instead I simply make my feelings know and offer them a glass of Kool Aid while me and my friends are having a beer. They just don't get it and are constantly espousing for more cops, more laws, more prisons and more entitlements and in their next breath they gripe about the NY Tax Rates. I can't fix STUPID!
The media should be kept out of some big news issue like Trump's meeting with Putin. Then someone should leak the lie that Trump walked out on Putin because Putin denied involvement. When the media slams Trump for it, let it go for about a week, then say that was only a possible scenario that leaked, and then see how the media changes their tune. It's the same old crap on anything Trumps does or doesn't do. This whole political and media fiasco is a farce, and I'm getting tired of it. I'm going fishing.
Real meddling is doing things that are to be kept hidden from the voting public so as to change the election !! Hillary and the DNC did THAT in spades. She lost because she is crooked, and one way or another, that came out over the years and thanks also to Wikileaks.
Trump won, and the election is over. We should get on with it and let him do what he was elected to do.
So whatever Russia or people inside Russia or other countries did, I dont see ANY untruths that were filtered into the lead up to the election at all. To that end, I have to applaud the hackers and Wikileaks for telliing us what was really going on. The DNC and Hillary were just not smart enough to hide what they to avoid detection. (That mistake will never be made again).
Why doesnt anyone say these things? Instead they go after Russia as the scapegoat. I want MORE transparency, and if the perps wont give it to us, its up to the hackers to let us in on the chicanery.
Even things that might never cross your mind. When you see a symphony orchestra and there are more than one player of a particular instrument, let's say, the French Horn. There are 3 of them in most symphony orchestras, but only one of them is the lead player, who gets to do any solo work and is responsible for the French Horn group. However, the younger player next to him is looking to take his seat. Why? More prestige and more money.This is true in every part of the orchestra. There is always someone looking to be the top dog in any chosen field, whether it's in politics, art, retailing, or a hospital staff.Politics is supposed to be non-self serving.In a democracy, it represents the people. But how many politicians put their own ambition ahead of the people? Once you understand that, you understand just about everything you need to know about politicians.
But that was not its original intention. Now it is power and money. It was intended to be representation and the job of the already wealthy.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/04/o...
Yes, you are correct. I voted for him as well, although I did not hold my nose. I knew he would have the strength and thick skin to oppose the left. He was in a killer business before and if he learned the street fighting tactics there, all the best for us. Many people do not understand that.
The Gulch defends a Russian dictator and his sycophantic lackey against all of America's intelligence agencies.
Do you think our guys are incompetant or just party hacks?
I've always figured that most everyone who works at the FBI, CIA or NSA would be a pretty strong patriot.
I can't imagine the work would appeal to anyone who isn't.
But you'd take the assurance of a former KGB Director, hell-bent on returning his country to one-party rule, over the portfolio of evidence collected by some of our smartest, most true-blue, front-line warriors.
Because they won't show you the top-secret files.
You demand they "Show me the proof!" - knowing the files will not be released to the general public - rather than accept the obvious.
These same files have been seen and accepted by congressional overseerers from both parties.
Perhaps you should take a more dispassionate look at what you do know but refuse to see.
Of course you can't speak for Ayn .
If she was to support the CIA DOJ and FBI that we have suffered with for the last thirty years or more I would have lost much respect for her. The top folks are corrupt and deep staters .
Clinton did spend campaign money paid to Perkins Coui to FussionGPS Who funneled $ to foreign agent Christopher Steele who paid Russian agents for dirt on Trump that was the phony dossier that was given to the FBI and used to start the Witch Hunt.
2 years $30 million spent investigating and zero Russian collusion evidence against Trump.
Manafort charged with a tax charge from more then a decade before Trumps campaign.James "liar" Comey net worth $8 million, Robert "Uranium 1 " Mueller net worth est $15 million hmmmm and Rod "the fixer" (Seth Rich) Rosenstein avoid and ignore congressional oversight. Because you figure they are patriotic we should take that as the truth. I highly doubt Ayn Rand Would be opposed to oversight of the justice dept from elected officials.
The panicking useless (unless you value destroyers) swamp scum.
Servers destroyed , stolen , acid washed.
Give me a break. Be objective.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/nunes-t...
I quit the paper in 2015 and should have a decade before.
No MSM for me. Thanks to Qanon I have never been more informed. You can type Qmap.pub in your search engine. Prepare to be awakened.
Regarding my above comment from about 2 months ago, add Bruce and Nellie Ohr to the projected Russian Collusion. Witch Hunt!
Now the hunters are being hunted. In this case that is a good thing. #Trust the Plan
You don't really belong here, don't you think?
I see you are from WA. Great State, very left from CA, if that is all possible. Aren't you by chance the "Rage" who came to this forum recently claiming Rand was wrong?
Ex-CUZE MOTHER FUCKIN' ME?!!
Who the fucking hell do you think you're talking to, you foul fuckin' usurper?!!
Leave or conform??!! To Trump! TO FUCKING TRUMP!!
You foul bastards hijack this site with your Trump trash.
You completely ignore all the Objectivist articles denouncing the man.
Then you acuse me of being anti-Rand!
What the fuck have you been smoking!!
YOU CAN'T CLAIM HER BLESSING.
YOU CAN'T CLAIM HER SANCTION.
IT IS NOT GIVEN.
LEAVE?! AND LET THE WORLD BELIEVE YOU SPEAK FOR OBJECTIVISM??
MY VOICE HAS NEVER BEEN MORE NEEDED MORE THAN NOW.
Trump was the best of two definitely imperfect choices, and I hope he can slow the advance of socialism for at least a few years. Hillary would have been a disaster, basically selling access to the power of government to the highest bidder in the clinton foundation.
I respond to brown shirts like so.
If we were standing next to each other one of us would be on the ground.
Galt's Gulch Code of Conduct: https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/faq#...
I voiced nothing but the mainstream Objectivist position.
I pointed out that Trump supporters on this site have repeatedly ignored Objectivist criticisms from our most trusted journalists.
I pointed out good reason why one should believe our intelligence agencies rather than Putin's assurances.
I pointed out that Trump supporters now dominate this Objectivist site even while eschewing basic Objectivist tenets.
I pointed out that you now claim a mantel to which you have no right.
You called me a Leftist and ignored my points.
Whatever, dude.
Oh, and just to have it said, like all good Leftists I have voted Republican since 1984.
But I'm not particularly proud of that. You see, I'm an Objectivist - not a Republican.
Are those trusted journalists the one's that reported that Trump didn't believe our intel agencies?
How do you define, "Dude"?
https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
Just two, although I've referenced Tracinski on multiple occasions
I have read most every word she has written. And, apparently unlike some, I even understood them.
With that said, what lapse or logical error would you like to point out?
Put up or shut up.
Seems lonely in here sometimes.
A lot of the old names have moved on but I just can't abandon one of our flagship sites.
Oh well. (with a weary smile and a proffered hand) Thanks again.
The intelligence agencies don't need my personal private information, but instead of honoring the privacy of Americans that they are supposed to be working for they claim "if you have nothing to hide you don't have to worry. Trust us."
I saw what the fedgov did at Ruby Ridge and Waco, murdering Americans who had hurt no one and threatened no one. "Trust us."
I see an investigation that has taken over a year and is filled with biased people who are supposed to be unbiased. "Trust us."
I see FBI agents writing that they will prevent the people from having the president they have elected. "Trust us."
I see the media constantly making claims against the administration without any evidence. The same media that protects democrats who created a phony file to use as an excuse to spy on a presidential candidate that opposed them. The same media that has publicized leaks from the FBI that has no basis in fact, but harmed the GOP candidate and/or assisted the Dem candidate.
Yes, you're damn right I want proof.
It's naive to accept anything that politicians say or the media publish without evidence regardless of whether the politicians are domestic liars or foreign liars.
The only way to regain our liberty is to reduce the power of the federal government.
We want transparency, not selective hiding of what we should know prior to an election
So, did a former Mexican President give his middle finger to Trump on national television? Was that meddling in our election?
Did various European and other world leaders make comments about our election? Were some USA voters influenced by such commentary? No doubt some small amount of votes were influenced. That is all normal.
Yet, some emails were released from the DNC for all to see. Honest, actual emails that revealed some info that made H. Clinton and Democratic leaders not look so good. It matters not to me if the release was done by or assisted by some Russian spies or not.
And, Trump met with the Mexican President while campaigning. Was that collusion? Actually talked to the guy, in person.
No votes were directly altered. This is all much ado about nothing.