Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 7 years, 2 months ago
    ... is a love story about a woman who sought her highest ideal and swore to kill him.
    Dagny Taggart is heiress to a transcontinental railroad built by a 19th century robber baron. Brilliant and ruthless, her first job with the railroad was as night dispatcher at a rural station close to the college where she studied engineering. Twelve years later, her incompetent brother is the president of the corporation. Her position as vice president of operations gives her the leverage to keep the line running.

    Her work is her focus. Her first lover abandoned her and his own career to become a playboy. Her public image is of a cold, austere business executive who is unmoved by emotions, either hers or of those around her. Yet she harbors a passion for the perfect man, her ideal.

    Meanwhile, the nation has been slipping into an unaccountable economic depression.

    It is not just that most of the regions of the world are impoverished, socialized, and nationalized. It is not just the continuing drumroll of regulations from the Washington government. Some additional force is at work, as if shutting off the motor of innovation and invention. Great businesses are closing. Their key producers are retiring, quitting, disappearing. Dagny Taggart senses that a single actor is at work - and she promises to track him down and kill him.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Lucky 7 years, 2 months ago
      MM, perhaps tongue in cheek again, has given a synopsis suitable for a mass market B grade movie or a pot-boiler novel. I like it!

      In this vein I cannot resist adding:

      Super-heroine Dagny has outstanding men in her life.
      Hunk 1 was a brilliant heir to an ancient mega-fortune. When it appeared he had become a dissipated playboy, the relationship ended.
      Then there was another wealthy industrialist who built a fortune from nothing by hard work, sound business practices and inventiveness.
      As well, two mystery men are continuing themes throughout.
      One is known as 'the destroyer' who Dagny intends to find and kill.
      The other invented a revolutionary motor then vanished.
      Dagny sets out to find the man with this outstandingly creative mind.

      The finale unites all the themes.
      Apparent contradictions are resolved.
      There is violence, rescue, romance and passion.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 7 years, 2 months ago
        My synopsis was not tongue-in-cheek. Atlas Shurgged is primarily a love story, according to Ayn Rand. All of the politics and philosophy are the context and background for that story. Moreover, that love story moves forward through the plot because of a conflict of values.

        All of that is explained in The Romantic Manifesto by Ayn Rand. Students of Objectivism also enjoy Advice and Consent, Casablanca, Treasure of the Sierra Madre, Camille by Dumas, The Scarlet Letter, many Twilight Zone stories, and even quite a bit of Star Trek.

        Just to take Star Trek for an example, the politics and economics of the Federation and Star Fleet are a deplorably collectivist (therefore impossible) utopia. They have no money, but they somehow are able to make economic decisions. It seems to be a command economy. And we never hear of an election. Who are these leaders in the Council, and where do they come from? ... None of that is explained, and all of it is hopelessly cliched. And yet... we have conflicts of values, integrated parallel plots, and a social context in which individual choices matter, and the best ones win the day.

        That Atlas Shrugged is primarily a love story (again in Ayn Rand's own words), is lost on the millions of film-goers who were attracted by the political themes, but never saw past the concrete actions to grasp the wider theme and plot-theme. Again, Rand's theory of literature is in The Romantic Manifesto.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by ewv 7 years, 2 months ago
          Ayn Rand did not say that Atlas Shrugged is primarily a love story. Where did you get that from? She wrote that the theme is "the crucial value of the human mind" or "the importance of reason" or "the role of the mind in man's existence", and that the plot-theme -- the "core of its events" -- is "the mind on strike" or "the men of the mind going on strike against an altruist-collectivist society".
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 7 years, 2 months ago
            The novel includes elements of mystery, romance, and science fiction.[2][3] Rand referred to Atlas Shrugged as a mystery novel, "not about the murder of man's body, but about the murder—and rebirth—of man's spirit".[9] Nonetheless, when asked by film producer Albert S. Ruddy if a screenplay could focus on the love story, Rand agreed and reportedly said, "That's all it ever was".[4][5]

            [2] Gladstein, Mimi Reisel (1999). The New Ayn Rand Companion. Westport: Greenwood Press. p. 42. ISBN 0-313-30321-5.
            [3] Dowd, Maureen (April 17, 2011). "Atlas Without Angelina". The New York Times. Retrieved July 30, 2012.
            [4] McConnell, Scott (2010). 100 Voices: An Oral History of Ayn Rand. New York: New American Library. p. 507. ISBN 978-0-451-23130-7. OCLC 555642813.
            [5] "The Making Of The Atlas Shrugged TV MiniSeries Albert Ruddy, Susan Black, Bill Collins". Prodos Institute Inc. 1999. Retrieved August 3, 2012.
            [9] Rubin, Harriet (September 15, 2007). "Ayn Rand's Literature of Capitalism". The New York Times.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_S...

            See also the current auction of the autographed "Heroic Love" movie poster for Atlas
            https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by ewv 7 years, 2 months ago
              It's not a matter of what "elements" it "includes". You wrote that Ayn Rand said "in her own words" that "Atlas Shrugged is primarily a love story". That is not what she said.

              Al Ruddy's interview is not what Ayn Rand wrote herself. He wanted to produce the novel as a love story in a movie and tried to manipulate her into giving up the movie rights without script approval. From both reading the novel and everything she emphatically said about it herself a "love story" is obviously not "all it ever was".
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 7 years, 2 months ago
            Ayn Rand wrote love stories. What's wrong with that? If you understand the psychology of romantic love, then the love story is perhaps the ultimate stage for the portrayal of conflicts of values.

            There's action and adventure as genres. Those can be emotionally sterile. James Bond does not fall in love. You can have a romance novel in which the plot moves forward by dramatic action. The Indiana Jones movies offer some of that (but only as a backstory) if you consider his romance with Marian Ravenwood (which was only developed in a later installment).

            We the Living, The Fountainhead, and Atlas Shrugged would be essays for The Freeman if not for the romance.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ Stormi 7 years, 2 months ago
          I like that! Well said. If more people read this synopsis, they would not be scared away from reading it. I was encouraged to read it first by a college philosophy prof. I admired, and even he did not sell it this well. Put this way, has ever romantic heroes been so patient as he waited for her to find her way on her own - the ultimate faith in the strength of the other person.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by Seer 7 years, 2 months ago
          I know you're an author, Mike, but when I first came across that term: "theory of literature" (and it wasn't that long ago, 2-3 years ago) I thought, Hey, wait a minute, science and math have theories, literature doesn't. And anyway, if there is a theory of literature, my "theory" is that it be a rollicking good read!

          Reminds me of when I was taking accounting, I told my boss (head of the accounting department); accounting has "generally accepted principles; math has rigorous proofs." Not sure if he took that well.
          We were talking about the meaning of "zero factorial" and he said: "I thought math had universal truths". I answered, "It does, but zero factorial just isn't one of them."
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • -1
          Posted by Seer 7 years, 2 months ago
          Perhaps for Mike, and I don't mean this disparagingly at all, love is the connecting thread that keeps everything from falling apart. And maybe it is.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 7 years, 2 months ago
        And I gave a +1 because you are on target offering Atlas Shrugged as a graphic novel. Rand pointed to what she called "bootleg Romanticism" such as science fiction, James Bond, Charlie's Angels, and much else that is good (but not great) in common cinema and literature.

        In that vein, many Rand fans endorsed The Watchmen even though Ronald Moore's sense of life would otherwise condemn some of his works. Myself, I also enjoyed the first two-and-a-half seasons of the re-imaged Battlestar Galactica. But Moore's philosophy (or lack of it) got the best (or worst) of him. When The Watchmen came out, I bought the graphic novel before seeing the film. I own a copy of the movie, of course.

        Another explicitly Randian Romantic scifi story for children is _The Girl Who Owned a City* reviewed on my blog here: http://necessaryfacts.blogspot.com/20...
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 7 years, 2 months ago
    I did not read it primarily as a love story. In fact, I
    was afraid of it at first; I was afraid it would disprove some of my comforting assumptions. (Which it did, but by then I was used to it, and that
    was okay). I read parts of Galt's speech in the library, and started reading the book on my brother's gymnastic nights,(when my father would take him into Waynesboro, and I went a-
    long to go to the library), before I would actually
    check it out. But eventually I did check it out.
    But I got over my fear, and eventually enjoyed it
    very much.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo