Rigged, by Robert Gore
The founders knew that human nature never changes, that those in control of a government would inevitably be corrupted by their power and employ it to their own design and advantage. Their solution was enumerated powers, an overlapping separation of those powers, a myriad of procedural encumbrances, the Bill of Rights, federalism, and limits on the government’s abilities to tax, raise armies, and wage war. The idea was to make it harder for this new government to do what governments had done throughout history. They had to have realized that any effort to constrain a government ultimately depended on the wisdom and virtue of those in power. Wisdom and virtue in perpetually short supply, they also had to have realized that their effort would eventually fail.
And fail it has. Donald Trump is making more waves by charging that the electoral system is “rigged,” and for refusing to pledge that he will not challenge the official results of the election. Our entire government is massively rigged, an agglomeration of scams, testament to terminal philosophical deterioration and default. Its partners in crime have reacted vehemently against even the suggestion that the election could be rigged. Their fear: once discussion is allowed about rigged elections, people may take umbrage at all the other scams and actually do something about them.
This is an excerpt. For the complete article please click the above link. While you're on Straight Line Logic, take advantage of the special offer and get your pre-publication PDF of Robert Gore's scathing political satire, Prime Deceit.
And fail it has. Donald Trump is making more waves by charging that the electoral system is “rigged,” and for refusing to pledge that he will not challenge the official results of the election. Our entire government is massively rigged, an agglomeration of scams, testament to terminal philosophical deterioration and default. Its partners in crime have reacted vehemently against even the suggestion that the election could be rigged. Their fear: once discussion is allowed about rigged elections, people may take umbrage at all the other scams and actually do something about them.
This is an excerpt. For the complete article please click the above link. While you're on Straight Line Logic, take advantage of the special offer and get your pre-publication PDF of Robert Gore's scathing political satire, Prime Deceit.
Another great article. Thank's
"The government is a racket, pure and simple, and many Americans, and all the sentient ones, know it." Time to purge the gene pool of the non-sentient... :)
Robert, please inform me/us when your new book is available in paperback. I don't enjoy e-books as much as paper and ink and I am reserving a place on my shelf right next to The Golden Pinnacle...
Best wishes,
O.A.
Likewise, in a 3-way race Candidate A could win the electoral vote by winning only 33.4% of the vote in each of those states, regardless of what the other states do.
Farfetched yes, mathematically impossible no.
However, the Electoral College is no longer necessary because everyone knows that California and New York have the wisdom to make the best decisions for the rest of the country. :-)
This is appeal to consequences. You're saying I should deny facts because people use them to justify bad decisions.
Trump uses very imprecise language geared to appeal to the base of society and despite the attacks from the media who provide their own interpretation to his words, he does not clarify them. I have no idea what he actually believes. His private sector record is of a crony capitalist but his smirk tells me he was using the corrupt system and he has disdain for those that instituted it. He can't be as simple as he sounds but I have no guess as to his real plan. I understand the concern that he could refute losing results and indirectly cause considerable unrest. In fact, I expect to see increasing incidences of violence which can grow to become a serious problem and I am not sure that the military would be willing to participate in the slaughter of a proportional amount of the 600,000 killed in the last secession.
When Trump was asked in the debate about whether or not he would accept the outcome, what he should have said was "it all depends on how many dead people and illegals vote Democrat."
Of course they did. That's why Benjamin Franklin offered these poignant words: "A Republic. If you can keep it."
Adams similarly remarked that the Constitution was good only for a moral (and religious) people - that if that changed so would the Constitution.
I think that our people - "my fellow Americans" - have fundamentally changed. They have become less civil. Less respectful. Less tolerant. Less moral. And so they advocate for the same to be reflected in their laws. The problem is that moral laws don't change - people do. With the breakdown in adherence to moral law comes the inevitable repercussions of those choices - such as economic collapse due to too much borrowing, inflation, and currency manipulation. Eventually, those laws will come back to bite us because as much as people want to believe that they can create "law", they are gravely mistaken.
Can't believe I confused Melville and Hawthorne, but then they are dead old white men, so who cares? : - )
Load more comments...