14

Rigged, by Robert Gore

Posted by straightlinelogic 8 years, 8 months ago to Politics
56 comments | Share | Flag

The founders knew that human nature never changes, that those in control of a government would inevitably be corrupted by their power and employ it to their own design and advantage. Their solution was enumerated powers, an overlapping separation of those powers, a myriad of procedural encumbrances, the Bill of Rights, federalism, and limits on the government’s abilities to tax, raise armies, and wage war. The idea was to make it harder for this new government to do what governments had done throughout history. They had to have realized that any effort to constrain a government ultimately depended on the wisdom and virtue of those in power. Wisdom and virtue in perpetually short supply, they also had to have realized that their effort would eventually fail.

And fail it has. Donald Trump is making more waves by charging that the electoral system is “rigged,” and for refusing to pledge that he will not challenge the official results of the election. Our entire government is massively rigged, an agglomeration of scams, testament to terminal philosophical deterioration and default. Its partners in crime have reacted vehemently against even the suggestion that the election could be rigged. Their fear: once discussion is allowed about rigged elections, people may take umbrage at all the other scams and actually do something about them.

This is an excerpt. For the complete article please click the above link. While you're on Straight Line Logic, take advantage of the special offer and get your pre-publication PDF of Robert Gore's scathing political satire, Prime Deceit.


All Comments

  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 8 years, 8 months ago
    Hello straightlinelogic,
    Another great article. Thank's
    "The government is a racket, pure and simple, and many Americans, and all the sentient ones, know it." Time to purge the gene pool of the non-sentient... :)

    Robert, please inform me/us when your new book is available in paperback. I don't enjoy e-books as much as paper and ink and I am reserving a place on my shelf right next to The Golden Pinnacle...
    Best wishes,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It’s way off as far as being realistically possible, but not mathematically. For example, in a 2-way race, if each state in a group of states with 44% of the population and 50.2% of the nationwide electoral votes has candidate A winning by a 50.1% margin, then Candidate A will receive a majority of electoral votes even if the remaining states vote 100% for Candidate B.

    Likewise, in a 3-way race Candidate A could win the electoral vote by winning only 33.4% of the vote in each of those states, regardless of what the other states do.

    Farfetched yes, mathematically impossible no.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Mathematically under the Electoral College system a candidate could win the Presidency with as little as 22% of the popular vote in a two-way race, and 15% of the popular vote in a three-way race.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    BUT, those electoral votes should be assigned based on the number of votes for each candidate, NOT winner take all. That skews the result. Thats how a candidate with 50.1% of the vote can get a huge plurality of electoral votes, and keep out a third party candidate
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The Electoral College was put there to give the smaller states a little more influence in national elections. For example, Wyoming has three times the number of electoral votes as it would have if they were distributed according to each state's population.

    However, the Electoral College is no longer necessary because everyone knows that California and New York have the wisdom to make the best decisions for the rest of the country. :-)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "You cannot strongly agree"
    This is appeal to consequences. You're saying I should deny facts because people use them to justify bad decisions.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by MinorLiberator 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I respectfully disagree. Take away the money from DC, cronyism goes away. By destroying the welfare state, reduce revenue requirements by funding a properly sized limited government. Institute a flat tax to eliminate cronyism via tax code cronyism. Get rid of all regulations and laws that allow favoritism that way. In other words, 99% of current laws.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It would be quite difficult to actually craft something to eliminate cronyism, but it would be worth the effort
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by blackswan 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    All that's required is to eliminate ALL subsidies, bailouts, bailins, welfare, social security, and any other government expenditure, other than defense, law enforcement and the courts. EVERYTHING ELSE should be private, period. No health care, no arts, no anything else. If individuals are unable or unwilling to do it, then it's not worth it at that time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by coaldigger 8 years, 8 months ago
    As usual, I am pleased to read your articles for the truth and clarity that you provide. I am 100% on board but could never say it so well. It is interesting that Hillary is the personification of the evils faced by this country and clearly another dose of poison, yet so many are cult like followers and embrace it with joy.

    Trump uses very imprecise language geared to appeal to the base of society and despite the attacks from the media who provide their own interpretation to his words, he does not clarify them. I have no idea what he actually believes. His private sector record is of a crony capitalist but his smirk tells me he was using the corrupt system and he has disdain for those that instituted it. He can't be as simple as he sounds but I have no guess as to his real plan. I understand the concern that he could refute losing results and indirectly cause considerable unrest. In fact, I expect to see increasing incidences of violence which can grow to become a serious problem and I am not sure that the military would be willing to participate in the slaughter of a proportional amount of the 600,000 killed in the last secession.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 8 years, 8 months ago
    Is the election rigged? If the undercover tape made public by O'Keefe is accurate, Democrat operatives have been rigging elections for years now. I personally believe they are very active and complicit in vote-rigging.

    When Trump was asked in the debate about whether or not he would accept the outcome, what he should have said was "it all depends on how many dead people and illegals vote Democrat."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 8 years, 8 months ago
    "They had to have realized that any effort to constrain a government ultimately depended on the wisdom and virtue of those in power."

    Of course they did. That's why Benjamin Franklin offered these poignant words: "A Republic. If you can keep it."

    Adams similarly remarked that the Constitution was good only for a moral (and religious) people - that if that changed so would the Constitution.

    I think that our people - "my fellow Americans" - have fundamentally changed. They have become less civil. Less respectful. Less tolerant. Less moral. And so they advocate for the same to be reflected in their laws. The problem is that moral laws don't change - people do. With the breakdown in adherence to moral law comes the inevitable repercussions of those choices - such as economic collapse due to too much borrowing, inflation, and currency manipulation. Eventually, those laws will come back to bite us because as much as people want to believe that they can create "law", they are gravely mistaken.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Owlsrayne 8 years, 8 months ago
    As I have said it before here on the Gulch, if this election goes south a Civil War will be looming on the horizon. I would prefer Secession, I just wonder how many brave State Governors/Legislators are out there. I feel that if the congress become unbalanced to the Natl Socialist Democrats( yes, I see the Democrats as Fascists) this country will descend down the road to immolation. A course correction is needed to refresh out representative republic.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You cannot strongly agree with you first sentence because you don't realize the climate change BS is exactly that. Some of the people found out how to vote themselves taxpayer money. That's exactly what climate change is all about.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 8 years, 8 months ago
    Always enjoy reading your work, need the dictionary every time so I learn new words! I would describe the current political system as a communist democracy. There is no way back to a republic from here. Either we find a new place, succumb to what is inevitable, or hope for Yellowstone to erupt or an asteroid to remove enough of the population that the remaining few will be too busy trying to stay alive to bother anyone else. I don't think Trump is any different than Clinton except in what he says he'll do if elected.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dukem 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you, and I shall definitely read it.

    Can't believe I confused Melville and Hawthorne, but then they are dead old white men, so who cares? : - )
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo