All Comments

  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So, body parts are "worthy of religious veneration" or set apart for worship? I think that the closest to your usage would be "entitled to reverence."
    "My brain is my second favorite organ." -- Woody Allen
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Now you are making excuses. Anything that distracts someone's full attention to the job at hand is a distraction. I've got seven fingers. I learned that lesson the hard way . Excuses don't cut it. You want excuses complain to the shop steward. Excuses and distractions are not what the individual is being paid to accomplish. Listening to music, lollygagging, water cooler convversations when not on break, Circuit City a good example. Employees too busy pretending to work to do any work and customers walking out making no purchases and never returning. ANY distraction from the job at hand violates all your nicely arranged from some is a reason to rotate the unemployment roles. I don't care if the employee is not bothering anyone else. The employee can't hear anyone else especially the waiting customers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Humans are the problem with the world's condition. Rand had an exalted view of Mankind, but she sure had a knack for describing slimy weasels. My backyard is that way, and my back bedroom which I have turned into an office faces into it. Thanks to my BW butterflies abound.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by brkssb 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Depends on the workplace, the job, and if it is a distraction or incentive. Judgment rests with productivity, safety, experience, employee satisfaction, and situation. Is music a distraction?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So is paying attention to work which often means listening instead of being distracted. Work is not there to accomodate different tastes it's there to accommodate the employees bank account twice a month. IF the work is done correctly and on time.

    The business is not there to accommodate someone's need for an income. It's their to accomodate the customers and the owners investment.

    For me... it was easy and is easy for me to say and to apply. . I was raised properly with a work ethic. For my employees it was on the sheet of paper for conduct in the work place. They didn't like it hit the bricks. They didn't comply hit the bricks.

    On the other hand if the employees suggested something that might help production and it worked their pay check had a bonus or a raise. That did not include distracting activities. One I recall distinctly was job rotation to combat what at times could be very boring work that still had to be done. That one suggestion worked into a ten percent increase in job completion. A second was pricing. I hated .99 and other idiotic prices. so all my stuff was marked in even dollar amounts. .99 became 1.00. The suggestion was return to the .99 pricing. with examples. sure enough sales rose 40% in two months. Not my fault you think 19.99 is a great price while $20 is not. We found we could raise prices and it woul work. 18.00 became 19.99 Anyway that was promotion time for one individual.

    But earbuds to accomodaste employees while they are being distracted from work? No even if it's Bach or Sibelius. But as for dress code? I wouldn't look at an application if the baseball cap was on backward. A sign of moronic stupidity unless they are welding.

    I sent them out to find the job bush. Big green thing jump up snag a leaf and wow your working. Kerry had them in Massachusetts when he was governor.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by brkssb 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Earphones were a wonderful invention for music in the workplace. So many different tastes may be accomodated.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Do iyou agree with loud music in the work place because some like it and some like it loud. As with clothing the only moral code is Me First with no regard to otheres not even a screw you . Just a 'huh?"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not even the distracted drivers? I recall another version of billboard size television sets that blinded drivers at night. Near Seattle Washington.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    He won't have to do it again Word gets around. And it's the base for customer relations and all that should go with it and so often doesn't anymore. Sloppy breeds sloppy. My application had a large blank space and stated write in your own hand writing using an ink pen what you can do to assist my business. Word got around. As I recall the job went to one applicant who neatly wrote, "Nothing at the present time. I have no skills yet. But I'm asking for entry level with training and I do pay attention. Please notice what I am wearing." Spoke well too.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Suzanne43 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually, I was referring to the world condition. Like Hillary getting off free, ISIS killings, and more dead policemen. Yes, there are many places that the scenery is beautiful. All I have to do is go to my gazebo and enjoy my backyard to name one such place.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If you are referring to certain humans, I agree. But the world? It is filled with beauty. The scenery, the seasons, so much to see and appreciate. The garden of Eden surrounds you everywhere.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago
    I dont think your clothing or lack of it is anyone elses business. You should be able to do what you want. That said, covering certain parts of the body might be something that a person would want to do on their own for any number of personal reasons- but it shoudl be his/her choice.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Radio_Randy 7 years, 10 months ago
    It won't matter if people wear clothes, or not. Everyone will be playing Pokemon GO and won't even see you, anyway.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 7 years, 10 months ago
    I wouldn't morally judge someone by his/her clothing or lack of it except for practical reasons. For example, someone driving a truck without shoes on may present a hazard to others on the road.

    When I saw this headline the context I thought of was employment -- some employer wanted his staff to dress more formally than they felt was necessary. That is not really a moral issue. The employer should be free to have what rules he wants -- but there are cases where it's enough of a burden that it should be negotiated. (The recent case covered in media, where a dozen new hires petitioned the boss to get rid of a dress code and were fired for it, seems to me an overreaction and I don't approve, but that's a "cultural libertarian" issue; morally the boss was right.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 7 years, 10 months ago
    Of course there is a moral standard for dressing codes. That's why we have the fashion police! :-)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Animal 7 years, 10 months ago
    My standards on this are the same as with pretty much everything: I really don't give a damn what people do, as long as they leave me alone.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No kidding. One guy's belly was so big he couldn't see his naughty bits. Perhaps he thought no one else could see them either. We were sure to keep our eyes elsewhere when visiting the park from then on.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by deanhcross 7 years, 10 months ago
    There is a clear distinction between social convention and morality. Whose life is threatened from someone walking naked in public? No ones. Human life is the benchmark for all issues within morality. Social conventions are subjective. They vary from culture to culture and transform within a culture over time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The reason for school uniforms was to remove class distinctions. as a distraction. Maybe the students would be better off learning class distinctions are a government institution.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Drunken pub crawl? Why you are talking millenial students and what else would you expect from that generation. Easy correction. Naked Chain Gangs. Moralit of it? What need of morality for people who have none. It was stated as a drunken pub crawl.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo