Now & Then
The Watergate scandal was revealed by two reporters and it brought down the Presidency of Richard M. Nixon. The FBI is investigating Hillary Clinton's private server escapade, but it is reported that they are using 100 to 150 special agents to determine if any misdeeds were done. We know they were, but why only two non government employees to destroy a Presidency, but 150 employees to bring down a presidential wannabee?
that we can't see what's right from here. . well, some
of us can't. . as for me, I have a telescope! -- j
.
Watergate was also investigated by law enforcement and the special prosecutor, but the media coverage was so different that most people now remember only Woodward and Bernstein of the Washington Post.
If Obama's Justice Dept. acts with expected corruption the 150 FBI agents will be turned around to claim that a thorough investigation exonerated her.
Take George W. Bush for example and his calls to invade Iraq. All the intelligence communities - including those of allied nations - concluded that Saddam Hussein was preparing to make atomic or nuclear weapons, yet the media refused to believe any of it and kept on pushing how Bush was a liar. Yet turn around and put a (D) next to his name and they would have been right there with the calls to war like they were when Bill Clinton went into Bosnia to distract from the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
If only the dead could speak. But then again, would anyone listen?
The MSM, by June, will be proclaiming the Hildebeast does not currently know, nor has ever known, anyone by the name of Ben Gazzi, nor is she currently afflicted or has ever been afflicted by the virus E-mail. Her fans will scream with approval at the new revelation!
The hell of it is that you are all probably right.
I hate the Obama regime.
Nothing ever sticks to her nor her "husband" Bill.
The definition of the word "integrity" has changed over the last 40 years.
It now means: "Whatever I can get away with".
She has always had a great deal of "integrity".
Socrates Q. Define man.
Mohammed: A: A featherless biped.
Socrates: You mean a plucked turkey?
http://noruler.net/13171/going-volunt...
More or less, just another bad habit.
2. Under; the law both would be guilty of suppression of evidence - a felony and tampering. Assuming we were operating under the Constitution and not the Patriot Act.
I'd hate to believe it, but there's plenty of evidence that you're right. Isn't it strange that this is rarely, if ever, spoken of in the media?
Remember, the idiotic chaos in the 60's brought the useless idiots into power.
At least with Mr. Vader, you can tell what he is by his look and his musical accompaniment.
Dom, dom, dom, dom de dom etc.
Unlike Obama, Trump is an American who loves his country. But he's a bit too much of a dictator for my taste. I think that Cruz is a better choice. The establishment dislikes him almost as much as Trump. He stood up to the establishment, he is a proven Constitutionalist, and has proven to be a man of his word. Also, beside all the heated rhetoric, Trump has a career filled with negatives. Although, to give the man credit, he defends himself very well. There's going to be a lot of crap hitting the fan between now and the convention, so we shall see. The one thing I'd say to the Anti-Trump people is anyone, Trump included, is better that Hillary or Bernie.
Anyone's better than Clinton or Sanders.
My beagle would be better than those two.
Now if you'd conflated lobbying and bribery, I would agree 100%. Those are the same thing.
As to free speech, however, it brings to mind the lack of it on what once was a bastion of free speech, colleges. It has gotten to the point where speakers of opposing opinions than the prevailing ones no longer bother even scheduling talks at certain institutes of learning. Very sad.
Fortunately, at least some parents get this: http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives...