In a commune, a producer produces enough to go around mainly to benefit those who it is given to; producing too much or too little can be wasteful, but surpluses and shortfalls only impact the producer if it is in significant enough quantities or quality to impact the commune as a whole. In a commune, any innovation or improvements are done only to provide an increased benefit for others, increasing one's productivity only creates opportunity to assist in producing more for others. Few people have the motivation to keep innovating and increasing their own workload consistantly over time solely for the benefit of others.
In GG, a producer produces enough to go around as a medium of trade. Producing more than is useful is waste, as unless it is a commodity or storable good, the resources and time spent producing is a waste. Producing too little is at least waste of one's own time even if higher exchange rates can be had through scarcity. Innovation and improvement in GG are a driving force, as they directly impact the increased value of at least one's time, if not quality and therefore value of traceable goods.
Additionally; A Commune is generally formed from a group of like minded people who mainly desire to help each other all the time.
A Galt's Gulch is formed of people who both desire to produce and have the products of their produce valued.
By definition, they are there - in essence - as collectivists; to share with each other, not to be independent beings. Why would a GG-type person ever consider a commune?
A good question, as a gut-check. Both are communities built toward achieving a goal. I think both would assume a level of protection for the common good. The fork is at the goal. Does each person sublimate to the whole or does each derive their own worth and joy and trade value for value? Disclaimer that I've never lived in either (probably few of us here have.) As an adjunct, what of artist colonies? Or Taliesin (Frank Lloyd Wright's community/school/cult)? The line isn't always so black and white...
tsk. assumptions! I think we CAN say that the men in GG are rational, independent and productive; there may also be some in the commune who are such. Hopefully, not for long.
Spot on. That is as correct and simple as it gets. Hillary loves the communes in the Northwest US, where common space is shared, parenting is shared, the individual or "I" does not exist. Truly, a commune would reflect the way the residents in "Anthem" were treated. Someone always rules at some point, but the mindless participants never notice.
mid gard as middle earth other close words are garden for garden gard used as a farm Both are germanic languages. A tun is a yard Aarth with the double A meaning the the oh sound looks amazingly like earth but I translated a town in the midwest with the English translation of Aaretungard and came up Ortonville or Ortonby and by means a village. The answer probably lies back in the Germanic roots of both English and Norwegian.
I remember Rand grew up in early years in St. Petersburgh in an area quite frequently over the centuries over run by the Scandanavians though primarily swedes they had the same mythology. Don't know if that's a connection but she was a prolific reader and soaked up knowledge faster than the English language itself
Good grief! How can anybody ask?! In a commune (as I understand it; I have never lived in one, nor wanted to) things are di vided up onto equal shares, regardless of how much effort any particular individuals have put into producing what is needed. In the Galt's Gulch of Atlas Shrugged, in- dividuals support themselves, individually, and even when someone loans someone else his car, by custom there is at least a nominal charge. There is an exchange of effort, not one incompetent sucking off other competent people.
In a commune, any innovation or improvements are done only to provide an increased benefit for others, increasing one's productivity only creates opportunity to assist in producing more for others. Few people have the motivation to keep innovating and increasing their own workload consistantly over time solely for the benefit of others.
In GG, a producer produces enough to go around as a medium of trade. Producing more than is useful is waste, as unless it is a commodity or storable good, the resources and time spent producing is a waste. Producing too little is at least waste of one's own time even if higher exchange rates can be had through scarcity.
Innovation and improvement in GG are a driving force, as they directly impact the increased value of at least one's time, if not quality and therefore value of traceable goods.
Additionally;
A Commune is generally formed from a group of like minded people who mainly desire to help each other all the time.
A Galt's Gulch is formed of people who both desire to produce and have the products of their produce valued.
Galt's Gulch would remain, while the Commune would disappear, before long.
The fork is at the goal. Does each person sublimate to the whole or does each derive their own worth and joy and trade value for value? Disclaimer that I've never lived in either (probably few of us here have.)
As an adjunct, what of artist colonies? Or Taliesin (Frank Lloyd Wright's community/school/cult)? The line isn't always so black and white...
I think we CAN say that the men in GG are rational, independent and productive; there may also be some in the commune who are such. Hopefully, not for long.
Bonus In the Gulch there is no Hillary.
Hillary loves the communes in the Northwest US, where common space is shared, parenting is shared, the individual or "I" does not exist. Truly, a commune would reflect the way the residents in "Anthem" were treated. Someone always rules at some point, but the mindless participants never notice.
I remember Rand grew up in early years in St. Petersburgh in an area quite frequently over the centuries over run by the Scandanavians though primarily swedes they had the same mythology. Don't know if that's a connection but she was a prolific reader and soaked up knowledge faster than the English language itself
Each individual is responsible for his/her own well-being.
No free lunches.
In a commune (as I understand it; I have never lived in one, nor wanted to) things are di
vided up onto equal shares, regardless of how
much effort any particular individuals have put
into producing what is needed.
In the Galt's Gulch of Atlas Shrugged, in-
dividuals support themselves, individually, and
even when someone loans someone else his
car, by custom there is at least a nominal
charge. There is an exchange of effort, not one
incompetent sucking off other competent people.
GG: From each according to his need. To each according to his ability.
Asgard is "Aesir" (god - goes back to 'ahura' in PIE) plus "yard or enclosure".
The other seven worlds of Norse mythology all end in "heim" (home); only Asgard and Midgard are considered enclosures or farms. Hmmm.
Jan
Jan
Regarding "gaard/gard" meaning farm, what's the translation for Midgard, which was what the Norse mythological word for the realm of Earth.
a whimper of condescension. -- j
.
Also, in Italy, there is a commune "Marotta" a small village for tourists.
Wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marotta...
Load more comments...