15

Jan. 6 Committee Tapes Have Disappeared (And With Them the Evidence of Treason Against the J6 Committee?) DC NIFO

Posted by freedomforall 2 years, 6 months ago to Politics
13 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), who chairs the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee that is currently investigating security lapses connected to the Capitol riot and potential ramifications for upcoming criminal trials, is questioning the disappearance of the video evidence.

“All of the videotapes of all depositions are gone,” Mr. Loudermilk told the "Just the News, No Noise" television show Thursday night.

“We found out about this early in the investigation when I received a call from someone who was looking for some information off one of the videotapes, and we started searching, and we had none,” Mr. Loudermilk explained.

“I wrote a letter to Bennie Thompson asking for them. And he confirmed that they did not preserve those types. He didn't feel that they had to."

According to Mr. Loudermilk, the videotapes met the requirements for congressional evidence under House rules because some of the segments were shown at hearings, and the now-defunct J6 committee, led by Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss), ought to have kept all of the recordings.

“According to House rules, you have to preserve any data and information and documents that are used in an official proceeding, which they did. They (J6 Democrats) actually aired portions of these tapes on their televised hearings, which means they had to keep those," Mr. Loudermilk said.

"Yet he chose not to.""
-----------------------------------------
D.C. is utterly corrupt. The Jan 6 Committee is GUILTY of T R E A S O N. NIFO


All Comments

  • Posted by $ mwolff 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    the appeal process should work, the question being. Can the convictions be reversed since the evidence to convict is missing? At the least those still awaiting trial should be released for lack of evidence.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by rhfinle 2 years, 6 months ago
    This is the same government that records and keeps permanent copies of every one of everybody's emails. Right, The House should create a permanent record keeping bureau, with multiple redundant backups, for exactly this sort of thing. Long prison terms for anyone who "misplaces" the information. In the meantime, as Abaco said, any trial where the defense needs this destroyed information is now a mistrial, as they can no longer defend themselves. If they keep him off the ballot, write Trump in, in '24.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BCRinFremont 2 years, 6 months ago
    Just ask China....I'm sure that Chairman Xi has a copy for future blackmail.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 2 years, 6 months ago
    Why am me the dino not surprised?
    Yes. we have no bananas, the banana republic said with a wink, wink and a nudge, nudge and a "Say no more."
    Get it? Don't go away mad. Just go away.
    Meanwhile, way far back when the great American experiment began, Benjamin Franklin told some lady who inquired about what (used to be our "We The People's" government), Franklin said, "It's a republic . . . if you can keep it."
    Oops! Slippery things can slip. Now can't they?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They have apparently kept transcripts of the tapes.
    Given how biased the administration and con-gress has been,
    I wouldn't trust transcripts that could easily be modified - just as
    evidence was planted against Trump and votes were changed,
    duplicated, and falsified in the 2020 election.
    NIFO. The fedgov deserves it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's what I was thinking. Clearly this is "mistrial" material. Let em all go...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years, 6 months ago in reply to this comment.
    OK, I noticed another tidbit. That is, the Judge needed a 10 page treatise to answer the Trump team request. The word "no" has only two letters and with the proper punctuation can produce an entire sentence. The old adage, "If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, then baffle 'em with bullshit." comes to mind. IMHO, if the judge was in the right a simple "no" with a couple of paragraphs on a single page would have been all the brilliance needed to defend her position. However, 10 pages of baffle sure smells of bullshit to me. Yeah, I'm not a lawyer and I didn't read the treatise, but TEN pages to say "no"?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 2 years, 6 months ago
    The corrupt Soviet trial CYA coverup is now in full swing. Why does this not surprise me? Why would I not be surprised if the J6 inquisition trial perpetrators get away without so much as a scolding? I don't believe the GOP has the spine to see this through and the commies will all be saying in unison, "Crime? What crime? - Who me?"

    Edit add: Interesting bit from the article, "A court recently denied President Trump's legal team's request for specific material from the Jan. 6 committee. District of Columbia Judge Tanya Chutkan turned down the former president, saying his requests were essentially a fishing expedition." Hah! The whole trial is a fishing expedition against President Trump! Apparently fishing licenses are granted for the prosecution, but not for the defense. Commie corruption right up to their eyeballs!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 2 years, 6 months ago
    so on appeal, all those convicted can now go free

    at least in the America of the past they would
    not biden the usurper's America
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo