I didn't catch it at first but I wasn't hinting at the fields, alfa, delta, etc from neural activity.

The covid tests were flawed and in my estimation, so were the testing of positive effects. Immune systems destroyed and their bodies continue to make the spike proteins...and don't forget the horrendous clotting.

Yes, In my opinion the most compelling of the arguments showing vax danger is the set of statements, made in public, some under oath, from the Pfizer Corp.
At first it was the 'Why the dog did not bark in the night' type of argument - silence about criticism of publicly available data and attempts to stop publication and sneer at critical individuals.
Now, real serious incriminating statements are made by the industry itself. Serious evidence on trials where data was altered or destroyed, and 'results' from trials that did not in fact take place.
For fun see Eight white mice, tests to show safety and effectiveness on pregnant women.

Also, consider, Dr. McCullough, says:
Prepandemic myocarditis
--4 cases/million/yr.
Now with administered products
--25,000 cases/million on shot 2 or 3.
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/st...

The biggest source of data outside governments which is nearly all not freely available, is from insurance companies in particular US and Germany.
Health insurance data shows excess "sudden" deaths are four times as much after vax roll-outs.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022...

Press reports are of young male sportsmen dropping dead in action on the sports field; while there are many and these reports get the headlines, the data shows fatalities in the next age group of 30 to 40 are more prevalent. The press will not, (cannot?) say how many were vaxed, but note the mandates. The press do not collate totals and compare with the (exaggerated) data on virus caused fatalities.
But we can, reported in many places by amateurs, and now, being picked up by more mainstream.

The data of more positive effects that were reported earlier as if coming from rigorously conducted large scale testing, were concocted.

That's right, they do not act the same. The interesting thing is that those without that connection will try to mimic those that do, and they do it quite well but they still have no conscience.

Those that have been surgically split have already learned and have the neurons to rely upon conscious survival in society but again, no connection to the sub conscious just like old testament man prior to 2500/3000 years ago.

I postulate that the change happened when our magnetic shields attained full strength around that time, shielding us from strong cosmic radiation as discovered by actuaries in Australia.
Pretty cool that discovery lines up with what Jaynes discovered.

Why don't surgically split brain bicameral minds not act the same as the connected bicameral minded that Jaynes hypothesized about?

For instance: those that rule over us, ( psychopaths with extreme hubris) are only a brain in a body, Humanoid, unaware of their own awareness. In other words, Not a Conscious being, not to mention, having no cooperation between the two hemispheres of the brain which prevents them from using/reaching/having their "Sub-Conscious" therefore absent a Conscience.

Old Testament Man was in a similar situation having a disconnect between hemispheres but was able to behave, somewhat, for fear of the voice in his head which he attributed to his god/his ruler/his ancestors. We, the conscious, know this voice to be our own voice, not someone else. We use both hemispheres, we are aware of our own awareness therefore, consciously introspective.

So to answer your question, No, there is no 3rd entity. Brain,body and Mind are 1 complete entity. Those that only utilize the Brain and the Body are an incomplete entity...Humanoid, as I mentioned before.

A computer program, when run with input, outputs something not stored in the computer. It creates the output.
The brain creates all thoughts / ideas with and without input.. I mull over the twin prime conjecture when in hypnagogic states while falling to sleep and awakening. I don't have to prime my brain with anything other than allowing it to think of possible new approaches to prove the conjecture. Complex neural net like devices like brains can create all kinds of thought like outputs. No need for getting the output from anywhere than creating it itself.

Who is this 'my' in 'my mind' and 'my body'. Is there a third entity possessing them. I only know of 'me' which is a creation of a brain in a specific living human body which was biologically produced from a particular sperm and a particular ovum. From knowing about other living things I know that I will cease to exist when source of me dies in the not very far future. I don't try to pretty up nonexistence with irrational beliefs of surviving after death as some kind ethereal field like spirit or ghost.
One should live one's life as an end in itself and with happiness as a reward

The Mind Exists too, and it's observable. It's where Insights come from. If one is only a brain in a body, insights are not possible because most insights require information the brain does not contain...I've had many and dealing with subjects I had no exposure to...I am left with no other conclusion that it came from my mind and not my brain.

If it is just the way it is as Rand observes in her three axioms for the Objectivist Metaphysics, there is only existence and nothing other. Now is there some consciousness such as in the book:

https://www.amazon.com/Cosmic-Conscio...

and such consciousness operating outside of an individual brain, just individual consciousnesses reporting out of body experiences and some kind of mysterious force or field inhabiting or creating life and consciousness in animal life. I have never come across any evidence for a mind out of body. Anecdotal pronouncements are only proof that an individual has some mental activity to report which may or may not be true about objective reality. About 55 years ago I was talking to a Rosicrucian believer. I am sure he really saw in his mind the, blue something between his hands when he pulled them apart apart. All that I saw was his hands move apart and heard him tell me what he said he was seeing. Believers would say that I did not have the special power of observation that they have. The human mind, especially with out of range neural transmitters can believe that reality is not what I and you observe. We do not see objective reality the same because of different experiences, especially while quite young. My parents only did a make believe fun thing, about Santa and Easter bunny, without scare tactics for not believing or punishment for not taking part in rituals. We just had stories with basic lessons in simple morality like honesty, truthfulness, and owning up to things that we did wrong. I don't shut out what others believe, just try to be rationally objective. I tend to have question marks of different degrees with most of what I know of objective reality so I think about your posits about reality and those from others. As I have indicated, I consider it irrational to take mathematical objects such as fields and waviness as existing in reality other than as fields and waves composed of actual particles. Some, like you seem to do, have the field as a cause for a concrete such as an elementary particle or complex brain's emergent activity of consciousness.
The mind as effect produced by a human brain has the moral function of choice as to permit or inhibit an action that the subconscious is staring. Those actions not mindful are amoral actions and moral actions with wrongly chosen effects are immoral.

No, worshiping has nothing to do with this, it seems to be just the way it is. An Awareness of one's own awareness has to come from an additional source, perhaps a "governing" source as I expect the "Mind" is...it's obvious that the brain cannot manage it's own perversions/temptations/addictions.

you can call consciousness / soul / self / I something other than something emergent in a complex enough brain as something placed there by whatever deity that you might worship, but that does not make it true.

A single elementary particle acts as as an entity, no waviness or field. Waviness and fields are mathematical patterns observed in groups of enormous numbers of particles acting with their identities / attributes / properties with emergent patterns as complexity increases. As the complexity of brains increase new structural patterns evolve, including humans with rational consciousnesses aware of results of subconscious activities. There the problems start with a volitional consciousness which must choose to be rationally critical and not get stuck in a selective thinking trance state. For many thousands of years mankind has had those who know how to get individuals into non-critical selective thinking states like religion, uncritical political beliefs, and other belief systems of those who want to control others. Much of humanity is still in a childhood state wishing to be cared for by a governing parent figure even to dictatorial degree.

So, you think that particle doesn't represent you? If the real you or the real me is a quantum particle or something like that...wouldn't it be appropriate to call that your soul?
As far as physical life is concerned, we are just a brain in a body but when observed, those of us that are Consciously Introspective, integrated... brain, body and mind or the i, we are certainly more than just a brain in a body.

You seem to want some kind of ghost in a machine soul thingy. Depending on ones viewpoint everything is made of waves and fields, elementary particles, or the present darling of speculators, information. I am a particle leaner with waves and fields made of particles, and information as knowledge of identities observed of those fields.

That's the going rate, as they would say but there is a measurable difference. The brain is highly compartmentalized and incapable of integrating information stored in neurons. That can only be done by the mind. The mind is NOT physical. Remember we are made of the very same fields we exist in...stands to reason we'd have a connection.

Our language was not the only thing confounded...health, science, biology and of course history have all been compromised.

EM field outside the head from neural activity within the brain is not mind and cannot think as a brain produced mind does. There is no brain mind dichotomy. The mind is nothing more than brain activity. It is interesting how consciousness is an observational process of what the subconscious does. Conscious actions occur when consciousness allows actions to take place. Try doing a learned action such as simply moving a finger by consciously demanding it to happen. It cant be done because the subconscious causes the action while the conscious mind observes and allows or inhibits action. Complex actions such as playing a piano peace requires observation of the action that the subconscious is causing and noting whether it is correct. If not, then a new learning process by the subconscious needs be allowed and observed until considered to be correct. It may even be that the subconscious is itself is directing some kind of spinal ganglia-muscle memory because of the time needed for nerve impulses from the brain to reach the fingers can be too long for anything other than reflex actions to be taking place.

"With data now available, it is fair to say the chances of a negative result from the mRNA vaccines is greater than a positive result."

Is there actual evidentiary evidence for that statement rather than just anecdotal Web based assumptions for that statement. If CDC based data is discarded, other research sources seem to favor more positive effects while anecdotal reports tend to be on the negative side. Because of the large human biological variation, the evidence must come from emotionless studies and not from things like knowing someone with or having a bad result oneself.

The brain, not the mind, but I would imagine they could affect the brain so as to interfere with hemispherical cooperation therefore closing off the "sub conscious/conscience" pathway to the mind just outside the skull.

You really ought to look at Dr James Giordano's lectures on Bio tech weaponization of Brain function and manipulation. He lectures at all the military schools, Government Research Laboratories and largest universities that do DoD research. Much of which is online (utube) and easily accessible. If you understand the gravity of what he is saying and you are not terrified, you're haven't gotten the full gist of what he is telling you.
"We can and will affect the minds of anyone who disagrees with our ideology" Let that sink in.

Correction: We are in the Forth Reich.
See: "The Rise of the Forth Reich" -Jim Marrs
ISBN 978-0-06-124559-6

It is a modern tendency, especially among the political class, to define and measure by process rather than by results. This definition of the word 'vaccine' is an example. Yes it does produce antibodies that work to destroy the target virus, but not with the same effectiveness as earlier vaccines against their respective targets.
A cautious view would not say these mRNA vaxs do not work, but they do not work well enough to be called vaccines.
With data now available, it is fair to say the chances of a negative result from the mRNA vaccines is greater than a positive result.

mRNA based vaccines are called vaccines because they do what vaccine do. They cause cells to produce antibodies and produce b memory cells to quickly recognize a new infection.

The protein structures, especially those of glycoprotiens, distinguish one SARS CoV 2 strain from others. DNA and structure differentiate different viruses.
The oral live weakened polio vaccine is known to be able to mutate and can cause paralytic polio in one in several hundred thousand vaccinations. When were you vaccinated and how soon after that did you get polio. Sometimes it takes decades for a survivor of polio to have it reappear.

Musks favorite pronouns Prosecute/Fauci.
BTW , so all the trust the science crap proponents
Have No verifiable numbers of who got Covid19
Because the test was faulty. Then we look at the number of flu deaths in the US last 10 year avg is about 75,000 per year but the 2020 PlanDEMic year had virtually no flu deaths , really . OK the number of pneumonia deaths dropped sharply as well. So , they say ,well Covid19 just overwhelmed
All these people . But the hospitals where folks who are ravaged by the flu or pneumonia and other complications.They are admitted Get misdiagnosed with a faulty test with the added benefit for a positive reading $$$$$$ to the hospital. Worse still was the protocol that caused the death spiral remdisivir , the whole thing caused legal legitimized murder , unreal, these unwashed filthy parasitical deletes all got big paydays to boot. If you are objective and can’t see a huge red herring on how we have been attacked , worse than 911 , worse than Peril Harbor. the full ramifications are still unknown , I would ask how many lies before they can be believed.

No Wonder Liberals are Terrified of it ... Boom.
Thanks Carl ...
I actually wore a Tin Foil Hat when required to wear a muzzle in sundry indoor locales. Mock these silly imbeciles.

Correct my Quantum Brother. Most here, discovered that together in the beginning.Thanks for the additional info, but will it be heeded?
Maybe not. But we continue to try.

To your last part, those that cannot be trusted, ever! and Not Human but Hu-Man-OID, meaning: without a mind, without a conscience and without, any connection what so ever, to all other natural things in the universe, the cosmos or Creation. which ever you might prefer.

I came to this: "Concussion" (YES, it was a blow to my head to discover) via multidisciplinary studies from old testament history to modern day psychology via Julian Jaynes and others...not to mention everything inbetween.

The worst of the worst, parasitical humanoids, the global delete, the great unwashed are in fact, not human in the same sense as We; and yes, many are caught inbetween with still no connection to their mind, their subconscious nor their conscience but could one day, become consciously introspective.