It is a modern tendency, especially among the political class, to define and measure by process rather than by results. This definition of the word 'vaccine' is an example. Yes it does produce antibodies that work to destroy the target virus, but not with the same effectiveness as earlier vaccines against their respective targets.
A cautious view would not say these mRNA vaxs do not work, but they do not work well enough to be called vaccines.
With data now available, it is fair to say the chances of a negative result from the mRNA vaccines is greater than a positive result.

If it is just the way it is as Rand observes in her three axioms for the Objectivist Metaphysics, there is only existence and nothing other. Now is there some consciousness such as in the book:

https://www.amazon.com/Cosmic-Conscio...

and such consciousness operating outside of an individual brain, just individual consciousnesses reporting out of body experiences and some kind of mysterious force or field inhabiting or creating life and consciousness in animal life. I have never come across any evidence for a mind out of body. Anecdotal pronouncements are only proof that an individual has some mental activity to report which may or may not be true about objective reality. About 55 years ago I was talking to a Rosicrucian believer. I am sure he really saw in his mind the, blue something between his hands when he pulled them apart apart. All that I saw was his hands move apart and heard him tell me what he said he was seeing. Believers would say that I did not have the special power of observation that they have. The human mind, especially with out of range neural transmitters can believe that reality is not what I and you observe. We do not see objective reality the same because of different experiences, especially while quite young. My parents only did a make believe fun thing, about Santa and Easter bunny, without scare tactics for not believing or punishment for not taking part in rituals. We just had stories with basic lessons in simple morality like honesty, truthfulness, and owning up to things that we did wrong. I don't shut out what others believe, just try to be rationally objective. I tend to have question marks of different degrees with most of what I know of objective reality so I think about your posits about reality and those from others. As I have indicated, I consider it irrational to take mathematical objects such as fields and waviness as existing in reality other than as fields and waves composed of actual particles. Some, like you seem to do, have the field as a cause for a concrete such as an elementary particle or complex brain's emergent activity of consciousness.
The mind as effect produced by a human brain has the moral function of choice as to permit or inhibit an action that the subconscious is staring. Those actions not mindful are amoral actions and moral actions with wrongly chosen effects are immoral.