15

Folks on shots and mandates.

Posted by $ Dobrien 2 weeks, 2 days ago to Education
39 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Our Nickursis posted this comment and It deserves its own post.


“Folks, on shots and mandates. Fact: There is NO FDA approved vaccine in the U.S. The one they "approved" is made in Germany, has not even got its labeling approved and is not available. The Pfizer EUA was extended. Ergo, all three shots are still EUA. That means they need your consent. They cannot mandate, or require a EUA shot. Period. Need to find a good lawyer and strike back. Issue is corrupt Judges, ignoring the obvious, but that can be appealed, and, if worse come to worse, you have to decide, HOWEVER, you will have one hell of a lawsuit for damages. If you gave up and/or forced to "retire" or quit, keep all your records and proof you were forced out, get emails, letters etc, and hang on, as this is far from over. Think about it,: FDA "approves" a nonexistent vaccine, in such a mush mouth way people assume it is the current Pfizer one. Then comes the "mandate" . People assume all is up and up. But read the actual approvals and such and you find out it was all another lie. I am sure some companies never think, or research, just react. There is no official mandate, OSHA never made one, it was just a "white House Press Release". Also, you can demand the list of ingredients, which is not available for any of the three, same for Flu shot. You must be provided that before a shot can be administered, but only if you ask for it. Demand proof of all the above. If your employer says, get shot or quit, then ask employer what approved shots are available, then have that FDA approval letter, and say "This one"? If they say yes, ask to see vial. Make them go do their homework. My employer chose to ignore the whole thing (120K company) and seems to just want to wait it out, as they have some pretty good risk lawyers who probably saw they are screwed either way, but a mandate would subject them to Nuremberg Law violations as well as damages and lawsuits.“


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • 10
    Posted by mhubb 2 weeks, 2 days ago
    agrees

    and the EUA was based on the lie of no effective treatment

    the issue however, is how many of us can afford to fight this?
    i know i cannot

    so i am Going Galt at work
    i see nothing
    i say mothing
    no matter what is broken, it is no longer my responsibility

    also the Health Care place i work for told us in am email the shots were safe
    when this is proven false, i intend to sue them for malpractice.
    they took on the role of my healthcare provider, by demanding that i get this shot
    THEY voluntarily took on this role
    they violated Informed Consent
    they violent Federal Law
    they violated the Nurnberg Policy against human experimentation

    they MUST reap the whirlwind they so richly deserve
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 2 weeks, 2 days ago
    Even if it were approved it would still require your informed consent, free of any condition such as "take the jab or be fired." It's in the Nuremberg Code, and is "jus gentium" universal law enforceable by any country.

    But lots of countries are still violating this. The Italians and Australians are now in mob rebellion to stop their lives from being destroyed. We will be soon if the courts don't strike it down.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 weeks, 2 days ago
    I'm pulling a decent retirement the end of this year and going low-pro. Moving my family. Circling the wagons. I know too much about vaccines. "The man who knew too much." And, I think we are starting to see a true unraveling of our nation that Joe and Gavin are very ready and willing to facilitate. This is going to get ugly because these guys can't admit they have been wrong. Not in their DNA. This is how genocides begin....and I hate to sound melodramatic. But, I absolutely am not surprised by any of this...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 2 weeks, 2 days ago
      Yes they won’t admit they were wrong because the true unraveling of our nation is their goal.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ nickursis 2 weeks, 1 day ago
        Not only their goal, but their single purpose. Look at everything they have done, 4 years of lies and deciet, 2 impeachments based on lies, then an election theft of huge proportions, then get in and systematically destroy everything they get near. Kalifornia bans gas engines and wants mowers and yard equipment (think about how many businesses in Kalifornia garden and yard work, all have to change equipment? Who pays for that?) This is a systemic destruction from all angles, I believe they are trying for a real insurrection to call in the UN to "establish order". Our military is being destroyed by the jab, either get sick or out, if nothing else comes out, we will be in a full blown insurrection in 3 months. You cannot trust the law, or judges, as they pursue political agendas. Time to scrap the the whole mess and have some revolution, I think (soon). Anyone saying "everything must be done by law, is past insane, when your opponents are doing everything BUT following law, or Constitution.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 2 weeks, 1 day ago
          Color Revolution still in play.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ nickursis 2 weeks, 1 day ago
            Yes, but I was interpreting the "color revolution" as the deep state tactic, where they manipulate social conscious and force an agenda for their own people to take over, is that what you mean?
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ nickursis 2 weeks, 1 day ago
              Speaking of that one thing that fell off the radar was the company that some of the more infamous retired generals started, using DARPA mad software, that (for a price) guarantees you a win, by flooding social media with bots that skew a conversation. It seemed a lot of Anti Trump stuff was bot driven drivel, but it happened every time a new "offense" was unveild.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ 2 weeks, 1 day ago
              “It is not content with alternative ideological and value systems and must steamroll over them in its pursuit of global dominance.” Doesn’t that sound exactly like what the democratic party has been doing to conservatives for years?

              “The state (and society as a whole) must combat a part of itself that is ‘rising up’ against the status quo, leading to a conflict of interest and a social civil war.” Think back to the summer of 2020 and all the violent protesters. Can you think of any instances of mismanagement by the state in dealing with the protests? How many blue state governors did almost nothing to shut down the protests? Was it done on purpose to follow the Color Revolution playbook?

              Now that we have a basic understanding of what a Color Revolution is, we will need to go a bit deeper. Revolver news has put out a series of 3 well-researched articles on the topic. Each one is fascinating and worth the full read, but I will be breaking down the main points below.

              EXCLUSIVE - The Curious Case of George Kent: State Department's Belarus "Color Revolution" Expert And "Never Trump" Impeachment Witness - Revolver
              Transition Integrity Project: Is this Soros Linked Group Plotting a "Color Revolution" Against President Trump? - Revolver
              Meet Norm Eisen: Legal Hatchet Man and Central Operative in the "Color Revolution" Against President Trump - Revolver
              These articles help outline how our United States government has been using color revolutions over the years to implement regime changes without having to use an actual military “coup.” Instead, they use street protests, disputed elections and a favorable media.

              When you read through these articles, you’ll notice that some familiar names start popping up. The people considered to be “Color Revolution Experts” are the same people that were involved in trying to take down Trump during his 1st impeachment.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 2 weeks, 2 days ago
    Over a couple beers with my pediatrician last night....He said it best. "The vaccines being mandated are for a virus that's not a problem anymore. It's like mandating a flu shot from 1993."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 2 weeks, 2 days ago
    I caught the attempt to mislead when I hear the release, and Mike Adam on Brighteon.com clarified it for all on his podcast the next day. It is lieen saying on TV, "We have just pulled off the biggest voter fraud in history." the night of election returns, yet no news outlet mentioned it! If you want truth, you have to look to Italy, Britain or Sweden for the truth about the vax. Germany is even working up papers to file for crimes against humanity. the virus was meant to scare, not kill. To send people to the death shot, which is clearly traceable in its wothless nature to do any more than destroy our own immune system, and set us up for a MERS type release to kill off that 75% the UN wants the US depopulated by. If they approve this faulty, leaky vaccine, they are definitely doing crimes against humanity. The spike proteins cause blood clots, graphene oxide and cause clots, cancer, or evn set Darpa up to control you via mind control. They have never been able to tell regulators it will not cause Prion brain disease, they were asked. Head of vovid19 taskforce said Pfizer vaccine "erases the immune system." What more do you need to ban this stuff!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Turfprint 2 weeks, 2 days ago
    The brave new world has spawned a generation of poli sci genius. It's not about specifics it's about repercussions. Planned Divisiveness brilliantly orchestrated. Backed up and fueled by mainstream media. Tried and true divide and conquer. Bi-bathrooms, racial riots, BLM riots, Antifa, absurd accusations, kkk. Mask or not to mask, vaccines or no vaccines. Keep'em looking the other way, keep'em divided.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by BostonTEA 2 weeks, 1 day ago
    There are NO FDA-approved Covid-19 vaccines that are approved for use in the US that are actually AVAILABLE in the US. All vaccines, whether for Covid-19 or anthrax or the measles, etc., have a vaccine code.- called a CVX code, issued by the CDC. From the linked PDF, these are all the drugs and the CVX codes for Covid-19.
    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs...

    The second column is the FDA Authorization status. Note they are all (with one exception) EUA or Pre-EUA. (BLA indicates it has been licensed for use, and when combined with EUA, still means it is NOT approved).

    The one exception is Pfizer's COMIRNATY - NOT the current vaccine in use. It only has a BLA.
    NOTE there is no CVX code, and in its place is the note below. To summarize the note - COMIRNATY will not be released in the US while there is a Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine with an EUA in use.

    ----------------------------------------------------------
    COMINARTY products are not orderable at this time. NDCs are listed per FDA Structured Product Label (SPL) document for the BLA licensed product. These codes are not included in CDC Vaccine Code Set files at this time. Pfizer has provided the following statement regarding the COMINARTY branded NDCs and labels:

    "Pfizer received FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename. At present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new NDCs and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution. As such, the CDC, AMA, and drug compendia may not publish these new codes until Pfizer has determined when the product will be produced with the BLA labels."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ nickursis 2 weeks, 1 day ago
      And there you have it. Excellent job pointing this out. Anyone who is under the gun should print it out and ask their employer to define which FDA approved version they are mandating, then ask them where to deliver the lawsuit papers too. That might shake some trees.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 2 weeks, 2 days ago
    Some vax has been approved, sort of.

    It is not available anywhere, there is no time stated for availability, any differences between it and the -not-yet-approved- are unclear.

    How that one got approval and the identical(?) others have not is not explained.

    What gives? Some Obscure legal requirement maybe.
    Perhaps it is just a marketing tool to further confuse/fool the populous.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ nickursis 2 weeks, 1 day ago
      Go read the FDA approval, it was for a brand named vax from Germany and stated that the labeling and packaging was still needed to be submitted for final approval. They suckered the whole country. That vaccine is not even been produced yet and is coming from their Germany subsidiary. I believe it was to camouflage the use of whatever is in the current ones, and there is so much evidence from doctors overseas of crap in them, and the effects on red blood cells, to make you run in the other direction. Would not surprise me if the Flu vaccine is also a ruse, get them while they are unsustecting...nope.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheRealBill 2 weeks ago
    Also note that OSHA finally came out with their "emergency temporary standard" and it does NOT mandate vaccination. Not only that they scoped it very narrowly to direct healthcare providers such as doctor offices and hospitals. It will likely still be challenged, but there is no vaccine mandate in it at all.

    note also this text in it:
    "Vaccine means a biological product authorized or licensed by the FDA to prevent or provide protection against COVID–19, whether the substance is administered through a single dose or a series of doses."

    I expect it to still be challenged because it purports to apply to places with at least 10 employees and has rather significant cost and intrusiveness aspects.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 2 weeks ago
    Our CEO here at hospice said: "Fk Nuremberg, Fk the Constitution...but she hasn't pushed it yet.
    She did, however, accept people's exemptions but claimed we didn't have anymore work for them.

    I copied the two FDA letters, HIGHLIGHTED the important information...Crickets!...I'm outahere as soon as I can.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Neofitz7 8 hours, 42 minutes ago
    Thank you for the post. You mentioned that one response to the employer was to ask for a list of ingredients.They gave me a link to the CDC site which lists the ingredients for the several COVID19 'vaccines'. What's the next step?

    Is there an alternate authoritative examination of the vaccines that identifies the toxic ingredients including the graphene oxide? I'm considering my next move.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo