Google’s plan to prevent “Trump situation” in 2020
Project Veritas is at it again with this very worrisome report:
“ Insider: Google "is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again."
• Google Exec Says Don't Break Us Up: "smaller companies don't have the resources" to "prevent next Trump situation"
• Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren "misguided" on "breaking up Google"
• Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As "Right-Wing"
• LEAKED Documents Highlight "Machine Learning Fairness" and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results "fair and equitable"
• Documents Appear to Show "Editorial" Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
• Insider: Google Violates "letter of the law" and "spirit of the law" on Section 230”
Video which was posted on Youtube was censored after 10 hours being up. 330k views gone.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6...
“ Insider: Google "is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again."
• Google Exec Says Don't Break Us Up: "smaller companies don't have the resources" to "prevent next Trump situation"
• Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren "misguided" on "breaking up Google"
• Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As "Right-Wing"
• LEAKED Documents Highlight "Machine Learning Fairness" and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results "fair and equitable"
• Documents Appear to Show "Editorial" Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
• Insider: Google Violates "letter of the law" and "spirit of the law" on Section 230”
Video which was posted on Youtube was censored after 10 hours being up. 330k views gone.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6...
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
But, as I see it, removing that protection means they, and all other forums, will supervise and control contributions tightly, if discussion is to be allowed it will require lawyers to vet every post. and, the gross manipulation of search results will remain.
- but there is no under-estimating the taste/sense of the public.
Your suggestion of 53min earlier would help.
This is proven by their internal documents and it's obvious from the results on non-leftist content providers on youtube.
Google/Youtube is not an un-biased platform. It is a left-biased publisher.
They do not deserve protection under law for these biased actions.
Take away the legal shield against lawsuits.
This report gives another impression. It proves that individuals are not wholly good nor wholly bad.
Sorry, can't think of much else to say here.
https://youtu.be/rtb2nqwOhHE
It’s like they are using the same “ML Fairness” algorithm programmed by the far left.
“
men can have babies now
men can have babies
men can breastfeed
men can be pregnant
women can fly
women can fly virginia
women can vote amendment
women can vote
women can rule better
women can do no wrong“
UPDATE 1: Congressman Louie Gohmert issued a statement, saying “Google should not be deciding whether content is important or trivial and they most assuredly should not be meddling in our election process. They need their immunity stripped…”
UPDATE 2: Google executive Jen Gennai RESPONDED to the video, saying, “I was having a casual chat with someone at a restaurant and used some imprecise language. Project Veritas got me. Well done.”
https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/0...
Men can cook
Men can multi-task
Men can eliminate alcohol faster than women
Men can be victims too
A little different than cited by Google.
Load more comments...