12

Google’s plan to prevent “Trump situation” in 2020

Posted by  $  Solver 3 weeks, 6 days ago to News
53 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Project Veritas is at it again with this very worrisome report:
“ Insider: Google "is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again."
• Google Exec Says Don't Break Us Up: "smaller companies don't have the resources" to "prevent next Trump situation"
• Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren "misguided" on "breaking up Google"
• Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As "Right-Wing"
• LEAKED Documents Highlight "Machine Learning Fairness" and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results "fair and equitable"
• Documents Appear to Show "Editorial" Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
• Insider: Google Violates "letter of the law" and "spirit of the law" on Section 230”

Video which was posted on Youtube was censored after 10 hours being up. 330k views gone.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6...


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 3 weeks, 6 days ago
    Google/Youtube is manipulating search results and killing off content that doesn't agree with their leftist, statist viewpoint.
    This is proven by their internal documents and it's obvious from the results on non-leftist content providers on youtube.
    Google/Youtube is not an un-biased platform. It is a left-biased publisher.
    They do not deserve protection under law for these biased actions.
    Take away the legal shield against lawsuits.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Lucky 3 weeks, 6 days ago
      Yes,agreed, from personal experience, what others say, and even now from their own statements.
      But, as I see it, removing that protection means they, and all other forums, will supervise and control contributions tightly, if discussion is to be allowed it will require lawyers to vet every post. and, the gross manipulation of search results will remain.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 6 days ago
    They might at least put a warning label on their search results, like cigarette companies do.

    “Warning: These search results Have been painstakingly manipulated and may be hazardous to your perception of objective reality!”
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 5 days ago
      “ BREAKING: New Google Document Leaked Describing Shapiro, Prager, as ‘nazis using the dogwhistles’

      “ The leaked document appears to contradict Jen Gennai’s claim that Google has “no notions of political ideology in its search rankings.””

      https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/0...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 5 days ago
        The Email says,

        “Today it is often 1 to 2 steps to nazis, if we understand that PragerU, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro et al are nazis using the dog whistles you mention in step 1. I can receive these recommendations regardless of the content of what I’m looking at, and I have recorded thousands of internet users sharing the same experience.

        I don’t think correctly identifying far-right content is beyond our capabilities. But if it is, why not go with Meredith’s suggestion of disabling the suggestion feature? This could be a significant step in terms of user trust.”

        It sure looks like Meredith should never have made that suggestion at Google.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 5 days ago
          “Today it is often 1 to 2 steps to nazis.”

          Anyone know where this idea comes from? Is this what is being taught in “progressive” liberal studies colleges now?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 6 days ago
    “ BIG UPDATE: YouTube has REMOVED the video from their platform. The video is still available on this website page.
    UPDATE 1: Congressman Louie Gohmert issued a statement, saying “Google should not be deciding whether content is important or trivial and they most assuredly should not be meddling in our election process. They need their immunity stripped…”
    UPDATE 2: Google executive Jen Gennai RESPONDED to the video, saying, “I was having a casual chat with someone at a restaurant and used some imprecise language. Project Veritas got me. Well done.”

    https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/0...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  Dobrien 3 weeks, 6 days ago
      Ignore the dictionary . Only the government can censor according to the big three PS EWE and Little shoelaces.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 6 days ago
        That’s absolutely true if you limit censoring to just an action by government. But without that limit, reality, others do that action also.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Kittyhawk 3 weeks, 6 days ago
          I agree. Someone may, for example, censor themselves around children if they're prone to using colorful language. "Self-censorship" is even a word, and it's hard to argue that government is always involved in that.

          I think people are getting the definition of censorship confused with application of the Constitution. Only government action can violate the First Amendment, but defining the word "censorship" is a separate matter.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  25n56il4 3 weeks, 6 days ago
        Hey. did we actually see Alex (Sec of DHHS) on Laura Ingraham's show crying about 'no money'. If they weren't paying the top six folks at their FQHC's $103,000/year and the next five $50/hour, down to clerks at $20/hour...they'd be able to buy babies and children blankets and toothbrushes at the Border.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 6 days ago
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by mccannon01 3 weeks, 6 days ago
      Just typed "men can" into DuckDuckGo and got:

      Men can cook
      Men can multi-task
      Men can eliminate alcohol faster than women
      Men can be victims too

      A little different than cited by Google.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  25n56il4 3 weeks, 6 days ago
        I'm not too sure about that 'multi-task' part. I think women have that market cornered.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by mccannon01 3 weeks, 6 days ago
          LOL! You make me smile. However, I was right there to raise two daughters and a son and now have six grand sons and a "great" on the way. Not to mention working, going to night school, and remodeling an old house all at the same time. This old guy can multi-task, LOL!
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by  $  25n56il4 3 weeks, 6 days ago
            Hey, that Indian who raised me worked all day at a Phillips Refinery and built houses in his time off. Also he, alone, built a new sanctuary for the Methodist Church. Preacher came by one day with a cold six pack under his jacket. Our town was dry! Never did figure out how that little guy got that six pack for dad.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by mccannon01 3 weeks, 6 days ago
              Good story! I don't drink a lot of beer, but after working all day in the heat on a building project, popping the lid on a cold one as the sun goes down is just a natural thing to do, LOL!
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 6 days ago
        You should see the strange Ideological results on Microsoft “Bing.”
        It’s like they are using the same “ML Fairness” algorithm programmed by the far left.


        men can have babies now
        men can have babies
        men can breastfeed
        men can be pregnant

        women can fly
        women can fly virginia
        women can vote amendment
        women can vote
        women can rule better
        women can do no wrong“
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by  $  25n56il4 3 weeks, 6 days ago
          Don't get carried away. We can't do 'everything'. I told you guys the weed eater is too heavy for me to handle. However, my John Deer mower is my baby.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by mccannon01 3 weeks, 6 days ago
            My wife had it all figured out a long time ago. When I went on my first business trip to China in '99, she made it very clear: "I'm not doing ANY of that! You're hiring a lawn service!". Never stopped the service and I like it that way. See? That's why I love her, she always has great ideas!
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  CaptainKirk 3 weeks, 6 days ago
    Scott Adams is incredible good in his analysis. He is a BIT TOO FAIR in saying her statements were vague enough as to be cognitive bias to say she meant electing trump, or something else.

    But he agrees that having that much power, and being able to manipulate the public image of the world means it's not good.

    Personally, it's quite obvious (to me, and my cognitive bias) that she is a LIBTARD, and therefore she meant Trump winning. And that is what they are going to prevent.

    And when you take it that way, and then look at EXACTLY WHO they deplatformed... You realize that the ONLY thing they meant was "Preventing Conservatives from getting elected, especially Trump"

    And that my friends is what is going on!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Temlakos 3 weeks, 6 days ago
    This is what I was talking about, in the thread about Senator Hawley's measure to add conditions to Google's (and others') Section 230 exemption(s).

    Now perhaps certain users will understand what I was talking about.

    Hint: no medical finding of paranoid ideation is tenable when in fact the ideas involved have a firm foundation in fact.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  Dobrien 3 weeks, 5 days ago
      That was my post and you are right. Certain users are not flexible in their thinking even when facts are presented to bolster claims. I called them factoid intolerant.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  Temlakos 3 weeks, 5 days ago
        They also might be afraid of the solutions someone is offering at the time. But that does not alter the facts. And in point of fact, Messrs. Schmidt, Brin and Page (the CEO and co-founders of Google) are the Three Monkeys, with an Ellsworth Monckton Toohey somewhere in the background as the organ grinder.

        James O'Keefe moved it to Vimeo.com, and I caught it there. But I love it that he moved it to bitchute.com also. Bitchute uses Blockchain--and as I understand it, that means their hosts can't touch it.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  BostonTEA 3 weeks, 5 days ago
    YOU CAN NOT MAKE THIS UP....
    I have received my emails from Galt's Gulch in my Google Mail account in my PRIMARY email 'folder.' I have 3 main folders, after some Google redesign several years back - Primary (what I look at 97% of the time), Social (Twitter, YouTube) and Promotions (Ads)

    YESTERDAY'S (June 25) Galt'S Gulch email, with "Google’s plan to prevent “Trump situation” in 2020" in the title, was placed in the "Promotions" folder.

    Does ANYBODY doubt Google is doing everything possible to manipulate you?
    The 1 hour documentary The Creepy Line is on Amazon Prime. Check it out.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 5 days ago
      Just over a month ago, Google had been putting these in my spam folder.
      Definitely worth investigation. And if they’re manipulating people’s information at an ideological level then they should be open and honest about it
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrshultis 3 weeks, 6 days ago
    The Daily Caller, conservative leaning, would like to see the unedited video of the google exec before believing the Project Veritas's, conservative leaning, hooded interviewee.

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/25/go...

    It is unreasonable to determine whether the AI has been set toward liberalism and some kind of fairness in favor of liberals. Typing in "men can" is like giving a mental test to a human with no context. Try "a man can" and get another guess at what one is looking for in a data base. An AI can be just as biased as a human mind without having been programed to be biased.

    Why do both liberals and conservatives just brush over secretly made videos of private gatherings? Might as well have the government just video our whole lives and do away with privacy. Too much fear of what one's neighbors are doing in private.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Joseph23006 3 weeks, 6 days ago
    No corporation should have the power to be the arbiter of which candidate is suitable to be President. This would be one occasion I agree with Elizabeth Warren. We don't need a 'core' group as in "Atlas Shrugged" met to make policy in the back room.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 6 days ago
      This is no back room. This is a covert expansive collusion of networked “trust and safety” political activists plotting on how best to manipulate the information that those on the internet request so that it significantly influences the results of next election using any means necessary.
      My own personal option from what I’ve witnessed.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  exceller 3 weeks, 6 days ago
    " Insider: Google "is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again."

    Well, Google may have ambitions like this but its influence is more or less confined to those who are willing to swallow the dogma of the left.

    By now, it has been splashed all over the place how bigoted and biased Google is.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  3 weeks, 5 days ago
    Big Google!

    Don’t be evil. We are morally superior. We know what is best for everyone.

    We have created for the first time in all history a garden of pure ideology, where each worker may bloom, secure from the pests of any contradictory true thoughts.

    Our Unification of Thoughts is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth.

    We are one people, with one will, one resolve, one cause.

    Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion.

    We shall prevail!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo