So true. Science is about research, checking and rechecking facts as we know them, adjusting for new facts. It is not about grants, political manipulation, and selling an agenda - or should not be. About 1995, the UN started pushing the CO2 issue, later to say they no longer cared it their was warming, as long as people believed there was and they could control them. Thus, it was a political power play from the first. None of the current models factor in both the Sun cycles, which are what control weather, and the past due switching of the Earth magnetic poles, both of which point to cooling to extreme disastrous cooling.. Politicians need to stop the hoax, as they can control nothing of the weather or what is to come.

You won't believe how many of the sheeple eat this crap up...

That like saying black causes white or fat causes thin or East causes West. Maybe there are people that believe this.

Well, when the global warmers were confronted with the factual evidence that temperatures are cooling, they were quick to point out (Al Gore, none else) that global cooling is part of global warming, e.g. that warming causes cooling.

I think it is safe to leave them at that point.

Donald.. just keep speaking the truth. don't listen to your advisor who want you to shut up for political reasons.

A question Jordon Peterson asks is, how far left is too much? The leftist has no answer.

It match’s their collective by any means ideology.
Therefore it really does not mater how many were killed last time. They’ll get it right next time.

That headline made me laugh. But...honestly, an attack on carbon is an attack on life. We're carbon-based beings.

Climate Change crusaders are no different than the Ancient Alien believers. Turn their beliefs into a religion!

Daddy was a Senator and had the support of Oxy Petroleum (and lots of income from their activities.) See this posting:
https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...

All of the models that rely on projections of carbon dioxide fail validation, based on moving the start date back a century to see if they correctly model current conditions, and they do not. Models based on sun cycles pass validation, and they predict we're going to be entering a cooling cycle.

Climate changers will often declare that 97% of climate scientists support global warming, but that figure is based on a flawed poll. The poll was sent to 3,000 scientists who had peer reviewed papers on climate change. After review, the pollsters discovered only about 120 of those papers even addressed human contributions to climate change, and of those, only 79 responded, with 75 agreeing that human actions were the main cause of climate change. So the declaration of 97% is based on the opinions of 75 scientists as representative of all climate scientists. By comparison, over 31,000 climate scientists signed a letter to the UN, saying that the UN's IPCC report greatly exaggerated the rate of climate change, and was unconvincing in its argument that draconian changes were absolutely necessary to prevent disaster.

On the Wall St Urinal, I agree completely, exceller.

Good point, WS.

Correct on all observations, Lucky. +1
The truth really could be spread if people (corporate advertisers) insisted by taking their business away from the statist liberal propaganda outlets. There aren't many CEOs brave enough to come out and make that point.

I got a big laugh recently when watching the pilot episode (in 1995) of the tv series Sliders.
The subtle propaganda was pushing the global cooling "science" ;^)

I agree, and that's why I had the "" around science in the title.

Have you ever seen the Daily Mail, New York Times, or Washington Post describe someone as "ultra-liberal"?

Yes. And that is only his home.

He is flying all over the country, producing a lot of CO2!

Gotta love the bias in the article. They start from the assumption that climate change is "settled science" and fact, when nothing could be further from the truth. We don't understand nearly as much about climate as we think we do but that doesn't matter because it isn't about science but the ideology of global control and tyranny. It's #science vs science.

IMHO, all this hot climate hysteria needs a bucket of cold water tossed on it to bring it back to reality. Trump might be just the right guy needed at the cold spring pump to fill the bucket!

The computerized extrapolations of suppositions of wild ass guesses being called "science" needs a good slap to reality. I've been writing code since 1972 and spent decades in the process controls field and some of the so called modeling "data that doesn't lie" being presented by these so called scientists and "Urinalists" (thanks for that one FFA!) is absurdly appalling.

When you read this global warming hysteria just keep in mind the multi-billion dollar taxpayer funded weather forecasting service can't accurately get it right for next week, so what makes all these hysterical idiots think the forecast for the next decade is spot on? Actually, the decade of the dastardly date of doom has shifted into the future many times in my lifetime and the New Yellow Times (Thanks again, FFA!) has just shifted it to 2040 in spite of the all seeing bartender calling for 2032. Whatever...

Being a Democrat is all about "do what I say, not what I do." They are the epitome of hypocrisy.

Even the Daily Mail, or writer Emily Goodwin, has a climate alarmist view in this article.

There is no sensible description of William Happer, the Princeton prof. leading the panel. He has produced the caliber of work that is of Nobel winning standard.

There is no mention of Turner, Soros, Steyer and gang who are the world's richest but a billionaire is named as 'ultra-conservative' solely due to opposing climate alarmism.

Patrick Moore, who was identified by Fox News as a co-founder of Green Peace - although the organization said that is incorrect.
Parick Moore is one of the founders of Greenpeace who left when the ideology of climate alarmism took over. The denial of his role and work by the current Greenpeace bosses, records, texts and photos altered, is textbook Stalinism.

Losses by the US economy- could lose etc. No mention of the certain losses if nonsense ideology is followed.

So, the article is bigoted, like many such, some truth can be got by careful reading. It is good to see the desperate attempts to promote "the science", but it is fraud. Thanks to ffa for posting.

And Gore consumes 13x the electricity of an average home!

In order to fit their narrative, leftists have actively excluded a lot of facts, theories and people from their climate science. The Nazis had something called, German science. German science was their “true” science that was actively kept “pure”, without all those conflicting influences by “unpure” facts, theories or people, such as by the Jew Albert Einstein.

The fact is that in its current leftist bent state, climate science is so corrupted that isn’t actual science.

Oh, yes.

The "elite" (I don't like to use the word b/c to me it is a distinction applicable to people with high standards and I have not seen one single Dem who fits the description) must have its perks.

They preach socialism/communism but they are the most rabid capitalists when it comes to personal financial gains. And those gains are not acquired by honest means.

Very suitable...New Yellow Times...great title!