All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    At this point I'll settle for collapse and run in utter disarray the other is far easier to take care of especially since a part of her support is the Republican leadership.

    In that event the the lamestream will switch loyalty within moments. But never trust them.

    No time to hold a victory feast immediate switch targets and whomever is left standing. The key word would be Constitutional Republic Party a coalition for the unrepresented or some very similar phrase backed up with an agreed upon set of beliefs that leave out the fanatics and focus on the important issues. The rest can be settled later and most the rest should belong to states anyway.

    Constitutional protections to add a clear definition of propery rights and ban income tax. The start point is a. all states have recall and b recall includes their state elected delegates to the federal congress of States With that in place any State can jerk any of the jerks that forget their place and for get to say Yes Sir, No Ma'am and No Excuse Citizen.

    Get the real republicans the few left 15 Senate and a few in the Representatives. Have them bolt the party and switch membership to the new one. That makes it a legal foundation on which to build then attack on the grassroots and the State level and whats left of the Rinos in the Senate.

    Major point get control of SCOTUS appointments. .

    Trump for sure is going to go along with whomever and protect his wealth first. It's why he isn't pandering to the left wing extremists. He'll support that and Capitalism. etc. and he won't go left because they are more of a threat to his wealth than anyone.

    But the key is immediate response with a plan everyone you know in the other blogs or media ready and if those seated Congressionals will do what I just said they will have a brand new party to operate.

    Otherwise if it's back to bickering and nit picking it will go back to being the same in two or three elections.

    That means priorities with the minor crap pushed to the side. and that means Coalition time. No matter whose at the helm.

    Trump will be easier to change than Johnson can be changed and Weld has to go.
    end of story. Think or Thwim.

    Why do I say that. People do what they do for four reasons. Money, Sex, Patriotism and the latter depends on which side and Power. Trump is a 1 with a dash 3 and 4 mixed. Hillary a definite 4 with a lot of 1 and dash of 2

    Ladies Gentleman it's just a matter of strategy and tactics attack the weak avoid the strong. But if you play like Temujins sons you wil lget a share and then face the same fight. That evilness is not going to quit. Question is what are you prepared to do?

    Stop Enabling
    Take Control
    Make Change

    and then take all the agents of the left outside and like any good revolution or counter revolution does try them in a court of law.

    Can't leave them running loose. No Quarter and No Pardons.

    Is what I just said legal? If it's a counter revolution definitely.

    And don't forget to invite the troops to the party. They after al have the ultimate legal right.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes it was reserving a day for my next mandatory vacatioin from the Gulch. Wednesday is pay day and pay day is when I do shopping, etc. So it's a freebie much of the day for the left. overs. BUT here's a freebie

    http://hotair.com/archives/2016/08/29...

    The rats are deserting a Sick-ing Ship. This guy wants them to go to Johnson so the subtraction from Hillary's less than six percent in a three way minus the Klein announcement on human rights for non humans will subtract more of the greens and will brin g it more to even steven instead of six ipercent. Add in Brazels outing of the Clinton Foundation wow no wonder it's a bad week for the Wicked Witch of the Left.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes but is he part of the Party anymore. I believe they disowned him at least the RIno estabishment did. Which makes him a double outsider. Can't have it both ways.

    Still it remains What he MIGHT do is not what Hillary WILL do. Sure thing vs lottery ticket is now Sick Hilly and The Sure Thing SecProgs Band with opening act Slick Sax Willy and the Flutettes. Am I over the Line Wanted a new name for the NOW Gang. Rush is using that one.

    I'll work on something suitable for Trump.

    Is Wednesday still open?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "I'm not sure why you don't think this would influence his decisions."
    Because he will be spending your money, not his.
    Both parties have used incrementalism to increase their own power, i.e., the power of the state. Trump is running to be more powerful and he will increase the power of the state, especially the executive branch. This discussion is a waste of time. Neither of us will change our thinking on Trump.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Trump at least knows what it means to run a private business. He knows how expensive it is to deal with regulation. I'm not sure why you don't think this would influence his decisions.

    Will he become an Objectivist? Obviously not, but that incrementalism works. The Democrats have used it for years to build the nanny state. No one is going to get rid of it in a term or two.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    True but one is a proven political liar and bully with no record of anything else . The other one is a street fighter learning how to live in a Madison Square Garden setting.

    Did you catch the post on Donna Brazel accidentally maybe on purpose of outing Hillary's Foundation as being dirty?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Is anecdotal evidence to be trusted? Either in or out of an objectivist setting. Nice to have a serous comment thanks.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I assume you meant What The Frack? Use of the other word is another prime indicator of Radical Reasoning. Those don't work either QUACK
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Could we a maybe agree on Hillary will not do this and take a lot more for sure and Trump MAY not do this thought we don't know for sure? We don't really have any evidence of actions in an elected postiion of great power.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My apologies but was one miss spelled word worth a zero. For the record it is not fads but facts. I guess what's his name decided to cut and run. A zero is also not a fact just a quack.

    And my apologies to the residents of NYC but you made a fine analogy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually we want the government to shrink the assets they control by returning them to private hands and getting out of the way of individuals and private companies. Trump will not do this. (Of course, neither will the other statist candidate Hillary.) This discussion is a waste of effort.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That would be fine if he had less money than his father, or even just a little bit more. Instead he has vastly exceeded his father's wealth and has been successful for decades. The initial contacts only work for a shot time, after that you are on your own.

    We are not looking for someone to build a country from scratch, they will have assets and influence to start. What we want them to do is to grow those assets, not shrink them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That is a diversion and a direct personal attack but moderators take not I'm not making it a complaint. It is not an answer nor a useful fact. Little Jealousy there not to mention you have shown no familiarity with NYC and failed to answer the question. Are you one of them? Probably not since you can't answer which means your personal opinions are suspect due to lack of knowledge. Establishment RINO at best

    Trying to get something that is worthy of a debate but it's not a lost effort. A great demonstration of independent objective thinking over. what.... nothing than can be stated and by the way to the moderaters if this is another 24 suspension deal can I ask for Wednesday?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You see this is an objectivist site whe deal in fadts not unsupported personal opinion. So I reversed your method to demonstrate which is fair. to demonstrate what one tiny unsupported word can cause. If you dont understand the comparison using one of it's most famous phrases you are not cognizant of NYC .

    That suggests the rest is suspect. Especially in the absence of facts which was apparent in a New York minute.

    I used to be a registered Republican precisely because my parents were registered Democrats and two bigger hypocritical racists never existed to my knowlege as a youth and adult. I then registered as a Libertarian and finally Independent and an Objectivist.

    Here we deal in facts. You had one 'he registered as a Republican.' Not nearly enough

    Back to round two are you one of them?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bsudell 7 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You'll believe any lie he tells you. To be successful in NY, you need a rich daddy, which is what he had. Daddy make all the contacts for little Donald to use. He's a liar, a cheat, a bully and a Democrat.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo