Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by khalling 10 years, 3 months ago
    It is just another disaster adding to tax burden and nightmare .and it imposes at least one regulation. Deregulate some markets and you would see high risk pools pop up all over. Get rid of individual state mandates -your insurance can follow you. Flat tax. Now youll have more money in your pocket. Litigation reform. Cap damages in hospital and foctor malpractice cases. The american standard won 't embrace these ideas because it takes influence away from yhe beltway and feds.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by iroseland 10 years, 3 months ago
    Yes, its pretty much a non-fix as it does nothing to address the price inflation in medical care. Used to be that if your kid needed a tonsillectomy you could afford to pay cash for the procedure and hospital stay. The same work now would be crazy to try to pay cash for out of pocket. Now, as much as I would like to just do away with health insurance and force the medical industrial complex to have to compete for our dollars. I probably will not get what I want. So, how can we reduce the cost of care? First, the billing department mess needs to go. Huge piles of money are spent on managing different billing codes for different insurers. There is no reason why if the auto industry was able to manage war materials, parts and labor with EDI that something similar to EDI could not be used to make something as simple as billing less of a mess. This would also make cross state line competition between insurance providers more easy, and more possible. Also, standardizing the billing codes would make it way easier to generate cost statistics across time and locations. That would make it easier for the insurance industry to pull the breaks on increasing costs.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mminnick 10 years, 3 months ago
    Want to interject a little political realism here. All of the alternate proposals are excellent. There is just one problem. It is called the FILIBUSTER. Unless the Republicans take the senate over with 60 members, there is no chance that the Democrats will allow any revision of the bill to pass. No revision, no defunding, no repeal will ever pass the senate unless the Republicans abrogate the Filibuster completely. I don't recommend this course of action even if Majority Leader? Reid does.
    The 60 vote requirement is not impossible to reach, it just seems very, very unlikely. So without one of those two events happening, ObamaCare is here to stay. Think about that when it comes time to vote and put in Senators that will vote to repeal the ACA. Then all we have to do is make sure that Hillary or some other Progressive doesn’t get in in 2016.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 3 months ago
      Maybe the Republicans will pull a page from Lincoln's book. Just eject the legislators that disagree and not let them vote for 30 or 40 years. Then pretend they saved the union and made everyone free. F%^*ing politicians.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 3 months ago
      The only alternate proposal I heard that was excellent was to do nothing... literally. Deregulate, allow inter-state, tort reform, etc.

      It's the only acceptable alternative, to me. Anything that requires me to buy anything just because I'm alive and a citizen is unacceptable.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 3 months ago
    WHY is people not being insured considered part of the "problem" with *health care*?

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 10 years, 3 months ago
      It's all about control and getting people into the system. I would like to have a major medical policy for major illnesses and pay the rest out of pocket.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by khalling 10 years, 3 months ago
        I think the US got out of control when HMOs
        came out. The concept of paying a fraction of the cost for something changed marketplace supply and demand. People were out of touch with real costs and small business owners were bearing much of the brunt of the true cost of the procedure or drug plus some. So in prescription drugs you had HMO huge demand and individual limited demand. It will eventually tighten supply which also drives up cost. Paying $5 for a prescription robs from those who pay an inflated price to make up the difference in cost. We have always paid cash for scrips. At times even the phatmacist is shocked at that price compared to what insured are paying.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 3 months ago
          I have never, ever liked the idea of 'benefits packages'. Pay your employees what their work is worth and let them buy their own 'benefits'.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 10 years, 3 months ago
          I don't like a flat fee for prescriptions. It should be done on a percentage basis if at all. That way competition will help keep costs down. If I am paying 10.00 no matter where I go then I'll just go where it is convenient.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by dave42 10 years, 3 months ago
      I can think of 2 reasons, 1 good and 1 bad.

      The good reason: actual insurance against rare but expensive (sometimes lifesaving) treatments (just like homeowners insurance).

      The bad reason: bureaucratic overhead, prohibitions on new providers entering the market and the like have jacked up the price of a $10 service to $100, but 'insurance' will pay $90. If you don't have insurance you get stuck paying $100, but maybe they'll cut a deal and only charge you $30-$50.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo