Let's see, where does O get his ideas. Well early on Frank Marshall Davis, communist. Then there is the chief string puller, Valerie Jarret, born in Iran. Frequents visitors to the Oval Office are Soros and Kissinger, haters of the US and lovers of one-world government.
Global warming is about control of the whole population, a goal. It has nothing to do with science, even in Obama's tiny mind. ISIS, well, he can barely say anything bad there, he loves Muslims and cannot bring himself to use the word "terrorist", except tor Tea Party members.
Yes, the McCains and their ilk will use terrorism in a fashion to control and distract people into voting for more controls over themselves - for safety, of course. Being facetious, but truthful. Bot parties are infiltrated with those who would take our freedoms from us and discourage free thought, even if it is by pseudo danger alarms.

i often wonder who controls the president? 0 is simply not capable of dreaming these things up on his own. I strongly suspect that he is and has been told what to say for years before he became president. what he does when he is in public for any occasion; state visits or with the military or general public is give his shit eating grin showing his pearly whites as if that will make every thing right. the man is the most perfect example I have ever known of expressing the meaning of FOOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Unintentional consequences: stand-up comedy

Did you all ever notice that regardless of party, Washington's chief product is bullshit?

Could be climate is more important than ISIS to US. The last word is the operative word. We should not be involved in the ISIS fight in the first place. It is not a U.S. problem. Neither climate change nor ISIS is on my "worry list."

Then, if we get a GOP president ISIS will become the biggest threat and we'll have TSA/NSA on roids. It's all about keeping people scared and clamping down on the average citizen. Each side has its favorite tool.

...keep em separated and fighting with each other... smart.

There in lies the problem. There are very few Professional Soldiers left, because they have retired or just not re-uped. They got sick and tired of being treated as a social experiment by the lefties. Another issue is that the children in the white house with absolutely to training or experience are calling the shots and not consulting the pros, because you know they know best.

Anyone have the correlation coefficient for the relationship between carbon emissions and beheadings?

Well, they do have one thing in common: both climate change as a danger and ISIS are both religions, and the idiotic, faith-based claims of the former may make it seem to the true believers of the Left as the more dangerous.Especially as the Left rarely recognizes or acknowledges any kind of military danger.

In this case, as another poster has already commented, given where Mr. O gets his "ideas", it is no surprise he would take this ridiculous view.

Unlike Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren, who have some grasp of the technical details behind socialism, Obama and Clinton thrash about grabbing at populist straws with no comprehension. If I had to endure European-style socialism, I'd rather have Sanders or Warren in charge.

Which of two overhyped "concerns" is more important? How about "none of the above"? What is important is objective ethics and individual rights derived thereby. All the rest is a distraction from paying any attention to that.

Climate change happens but there is no evidence whatsoever that any particularly dangerous amount of climate change is in the cards. ISIS should be stomped out and quickly and it should not be at all difficult to do so. But that is not the most important point.

What does this post have to do with Objectivism, AR, or AS?