A Country Within a Country: Massive Immigration’s Cultural Invasion of America
Posted by UncommonSense 9 years, 1 month ago to Culture
The illegals march on selma...all planned and no doubt funded by the self-proclaimed 'elite'. Here's some more info to back up what we are seeing unfold today.
I wish there was a "Scotty" to beam me up...I've seen enough.
I wish there was a "Scotty" to beam me up...I've seen enough.
We are all but screwed.
Am I getting too symbolically satirical for you? Here's the bottom line translation: Allowing illegals to become part of the nation will eventually turn good citizen bad as they see the lawbreakers getting a better deal than they were born to receive.
For obvious reasons I'm an expat living on my retirement pay....until I need to use part of that account. thank you Mr. and Mrs. America and all the ships at sea. Since I could compete honestly and fairly in the land of the big PX I used my skills and 'looted the looters?' Legally. However I never mooched couldn't figure a way to turn a profit. And I'm not giving back. I'm collecting on the pay and pension and benefits owed that were reneged on. When I do move to the next country. I'll be able to buy citizenship. You see there are no interest accounts and there are no interest accounts. And it's all legal until...I die. Tough...but the milk's still sweet.
Only dumb asses give back an extra percentage t the people who just looted and mooched them.
Until then it's all fiction...or is it.
Why should anyone breaking this line of application be awarded or entitled to anything??!!
I cannot tolerate any idea on this subject with the exception of loading all illegals on buses or planes, after mug shots and finger printing, and sending them back to where they came from.
How has this evolved into the U.S. being a "free for all" country? In name it is not, there are regulations, but in actions it is, because regulations are not being enforced. This situation is further aggravated and fostered by both parties since on one side they are looking for votes no matter how or who votes and on the other side they are afraid to alienate immigrants and risk losing their votes when every vote is critical. There is a stigma around this subject of breaking up families, leaving people hungry, suffering children, etc., that puts a direct burden on a politician that refuses to go along with this administration's policy.
If the citizens (legal) have made it known that they are frustrated with Washington and the recent changes in the Congress/Senate have shown this, then the Democrats will have to compensate, as they have in the past, allowing voting without legal documentation, votes from the dead and multiple votes by the same people being bused to various voting sites by organizations like ACORN.
The responsibility goes to our government and it has not protected its legal citizens. They are robbing their citizens to perpetrate the means to their end. If Americans do not stand up and demand decisive action then we will merit the government we have.
The Gulchers are preppers.
What a prophetess!
20 years of reading Ayn and my threads all run together.
The real invading threat is Socialism, and it's not coming from the immigrants, it comes from the top of the US gov. Of course if you are offered free money, you take it. The article makes a very good point, and Americans should be as straightforward as in other countries regarding these tactics, in Mexico it's called "vote buying". Creating people's dependency on the government is the best insurance for power.
A few months ago one of the threads featured that one. Trump A Dump Dumbo was claiming it was proof of Mexico encouraging illegals. He's no Spanish speaker or reader. Bu stretching the truth as the plagiarizing the Ford factory move proved. Stretching as in shredding it to pieces.
are invading and changing the culture to permanent
Democrat voters and, unfortunately, supporters of
the fascist power mongers. -- j
At least until the propagandists of the left change the meanings again.....
But I'll give you a while to think about it.
http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-ani...
I don't understand why people don't fight for the things they want in the nation of their birth. We must stop the flow of honey from the welfare state.
What then? I find your questioning over the truthfulness of the facts listed odd. It seems you place waaay too much confidence that the gubbermeant wouldn't lie to your face or conspire to put you in economic chains while illegals are benefitting gleefully.
Stop it with the PC xenophobia nonsense. Nobody here is afraid of Mexicans or have some sort of sick mentality that they are superior to Mexicans. Such sickness reeks of elitism and you won't find that here in the Gulch.
You want to come to the United Socialist States of America? You have potential to bring something to the table, economically-speaking? Cool. Come here LEGALLY. There's nothing xenophobic about that. FOLLOW THE LAW. How is that xenophobic?
So far it's been an effective strategy.
It's the sheeple on the fence who have to decide who to believe.
Do you know of an article from a news outlet like the Washington Post or NYT that touches on this? It would be a huge problem b/c it would be like intentionally creating an underclass: "You're really not supposed to be here, but we'll look the other way and even give you some free benefits if you don't alienate any gov't officials."
My guess is that many here hate the welfare / socialist setup so much (which I completely agree with) that they do not have an open mind on what "legal" immigration should be.
You do not see many (any?) postings here defending of welfare because we all must " FOLLOW THE LAW", yet it seems that common
appeal to authority is used by many on immigration.
Yes. I disagree with our policy during my lifetime of looking the other way. I also disagree with solving this problem by executive order, bypassing Congress, even if the benevolent dictator happens to be carrying out my wishes.
Keep in mind, Alinsky isn't the one who thought of that idea, it was actually proposed earlier by two numbskulls: Cloward & Piven. Here's a synopsis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2...
In the US, we are desperately trying to get a hold of our freedoms and our economy. Now we have tens of thousands of people crossing the border to put further stress on both of those goals.
I do not support Law for the sake of Law, and I will be willing to discuss whether or not a given law is a good one. But neither am I an anarchist: And one of the laws I think is a 'good idea' is to control our borders. I feel that this variable of massive illegal immigration has been deliberately introduced to obscure the pursuit of individual freedom and the introduction of economic controls on our government.
Jan
These are the but three that define a nation.
#1: Secure the borders. Even a human cell knows to do that.
Jan
These are the but three that define a nation."
I'm hoping the nation state declines in power and people pick their own language and culture in the form of "tribes" they form without regard to borders. Borders decrease in importance as you increasingly can transmit values, in the form of software and CAD files, across borders for free. The only vestige I wish to see of the nation state is very few laws against use of force and enforcing contracts and have them uniformly and strictly enforced.
I find the borders to me mostly a relic from a time when people's interests were aligned by geography and it was hard to get items of value past customs agents. We answer a bunch of questions even though we could press a button an send real value across the border with little gov't regulation.
Simply because how easy it is to send value and have conversations across borders, I think language and borders will decrease in importance and culture will flourish separately from them.
Protection is what government's only real job and is what it should be doing.
Without proper boundaries around a country or an individual, however, you lose the ability to self-protect.
Borders, language and culture are parameters for the proper function of a country.