So If You Were Republican Leadership, What Would Be Your First Actions To Take?

Posted by khalling 9 years, 5 months ago to Government
54 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

I thought it would be fun to see how gulcher's would prioritize the Republican Agenda starting in January. I'll start-
The house needs to defund the IRS until it cleans house, hands over documents requested by the Senate Intelligence committee and fire alot of people who were in any way involved in these scandals against conservative groups.. Someone needs to dust off that flat tax bill . De-fund the NSA. We don't need it. Defund the EPA until they stop the war on coal, the war against american citizens, and fire all the top decision makers in the organization. Next!


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by 9 years, 5 months ago
    while the house is busy defunding, the Senate should immediately repeal Sarbanes-Oxley and repeal much of Dodd-Frank.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 5 months ago
      And repeal everything else that's been done under Obama's administration and most of Bush's. If we don't take the country back from the normal political class at this point, it'll never come back.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mdk2608 9 years, 5 months ago
    I think we have to be careful on the short-term that we are not labled obstructionist. You know Obama is going to take that position. We owe it to the public to put a bill on the presidents desk that will repeal portions if not all of Obamacare. Pass XL pipeline Boarder security is important too. I would put bills on his desk that are good and let the President vetos them so the public can see who is the real party of No. One bill a week would be nice and then start moving into tax reform and limit the IRS. I would also start investigations into corruption we believe we can win. We have to think about things that can pass too. There maybe some Dems who view Obama as toxic and may be inclined to vote with conservatives. i.e.XL If we get to 54 seats its only 6 dems needed for an override. We also need to look at safeguards that will prevent the President from circumventing the consitution and using it to destroy the country from within. Obama has laid the blueprint for some other Maxist who might be president someday and use our own laws agains us. This cannot be allowed. We can not have a department of Justice that is political. Possible when Eric Withholders replacment is named we can address this issue in confirmation hearings. There are so many issues we need to address. Thats when is going through my mind at the moment. I reserve the right to revisit this after I get some sleep after staying up all night watching and being at election events.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 5 months ago
    Step 1. Repeal all of Obamacare.
    Step 2 Initiate Impeachment of Obama.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by mdk2608 9 years, 5 months ago
      # 2 is problematic. I would like nothing more than to see Obama impeached but it may not be the answer. First you have Biden, second we don't have 60 votes to pull it off, second the public will give dems a sympathy vote and it will destroy any chances for republicans to regain The White House. The black community would claim racism. Obama now is irrelevant. He has to switch to defense now and he will fail because he has lost all credibility. Obama is possibly the greatest gift to the conservative cause . The more he talks the more he slits his party's throat. Everything he touches fails and could set Dems back for a generation or two.

      In Wisconsin Dems thought they would get Scott Walker and started a recall. It backfired big time. Walker got public support, people thought Dems were sore losers and they are still paying the price in this State. Meanwhile Walker is emboldened and he is stronger today than before. The recall brought out the base and big money started to flow his way. As a result of that there is a good chance he will run for President.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years, 5 months ago
      Because the stability of the nation and its leadership is paramount to the security, safety, and continuation of government, and to the promotion of the principles of the government, and to the sanctity and stability of the office of the president of the United States, I, (insert current Potus here), on this date, do hereby sign this executive order forbidding the impeachment and removal of office an incumbent or former incumbent of the office of the President of the United States, a cabinet member or other governmental employee appointed, assigned, or employed by the President of the United States, or the possibility of filing of criminal or civil charges of any person who is following the letter or spirit of any law, decree, or decision handed down from the President of the United States. By this order, to insure the safety and security of the United States, I also hereby indefinitely suspend all portions of the Constitution of the United States, and all relevant laws, judicial decisions, and codes contrary to the meaning and intent of this executive order and further, declare that any person attempting to subvert or nullify the provision of this, or any other executive order past, present, or future, located anywhere on the planet, shall be declared an Enemy of the State, and shall be subject to any and all penalties reserved for and assigned to such a classification of peoples. Signed this XX day of XX, 20XX.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years, 5 months ago
    Mandatory review of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and their Oaths of office. I believe too often they mouth the words without comprehension. Then offer a bill that anyone authoring a bill found to be in contradiction to those founding documents by 25% of either House or Senate should have their privilege to offer bills or amendments suspended for a period of six months. Second offense one year suspension and tar and feathers. :) De-fund/rescind all executive orders not directly related to enhancing the security of the nation and still congruent with the Constitution. Pass a bill that restricts all executive orders to same and include similar sanctions. Abolish the IRS and all other Federal agencies in conflict with the Constitutional protections of the citizens or within the enumerated powers. I could go on, but that should keep everyone busy for a day or two. Return responsibility and thus sovereignty to the states.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 5 months ago
    Repeal the federal reserve act and close down the TBTF banks. Forgive (tax-free) all the outstanding loans made by those banks in the past 50 years to individuals and small businesses.
    Take the military from Iraq, Afghanistan, et al, and assign them duty to protect the lower-48 US borders.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 5 months ago
      Not only repeal the Fed, refute all debt and start over.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 5 months ago
        Assuming the debt was 'sold' to investors, there is the issue of that contract to be negotiated.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 5 months ago
          That would be a very painful thing. Immediate hyper -inflation. I say you change the legal tender laws first. That would immediately take power away from the fed
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 5 months ago
            Which thing are you referring to causing hyper inflation, kh?
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by 9 years, 5 months ago
              Zen's concept of refuting debt
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 5 months ago
                Sorry, not familiar and google search came up empty. Link, please?
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 5 months ago
                  Freedom, refute is certainly not the best word to use, but if you've repealed the Fed, you've also said that fiat money is no good. Since your debt is fiat monies with various manipulated relationships to real commodities, how can you owe repayment in such. We might be able to negotiate repayment to some in gold/silver, but I doubt that we have enough left to make much of a dent.

                  It seems to me that if we repealed the Fed, we've essentially crashed the world's economy. Canceling all debt seems small potatoes in that case. Personally, I don't have a big problem with that since no-one's bothered to recompense the US for the cost of being the world's policeman for the last 68 years.

                  But in reality, I'm actually talking about a rebellion anyway. It's a complete reset. Pull the surface Navy back to defend all sea approaches, the Army back to defend the North and South land approaches, the submarine forces patrolling as the preventive threat for any that try a missile attack, and let the rest of the world deal with their own affairs. During the next 10 to 20 years, we would have to concentrate on our own conversion to a truly free country.

                  Maybe pie in the sky and too draconian for many, but as far as I'm concerned we're at our last opportunity position for the next several generations. It's either do it now, or give up on the entire concept of individual liberty and responsibility in the US.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Snoogoo 9 years, 5 months ago
    It would take someone with extremely firm principles to vote themselves a smaller budget, less power, and ultimately a smaller paycheck. Republicans are better than Democrats, but sadly, I'm not very hopeful.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Wonky 9 years, 5 months ago
    This is fairly abstract, but...

    Reduce taxes and regulation on production (truly stimulate the economy) and initiate federal sales and/or value-added taxes on consumption to get us out of debt (for as long as it takes). Our national debt is everyone's problem whether we approved of it or not.

    A national sales tax with exemptions for basic food items ought to satisfy the left's welfare instincts. Grade the sales tax if they want - I have no problem paying sin taxes for my alcohol and cigarettes - I really need to cut back anyway - Wouldn't that pacify the left? Tax the crap out of yachts, private jets, luxury vehicles and other luxuries - The left should love that. VAT "might" make local businesses more competitive with chains (by taxing all the middle-men) and bring communities closer together - I can’t imagine either party not wanting to claim credit for that. VAT seems like a hassle though. It could just be rolled into sales tax by removing sales tax exemptions for resellers.

    Imagine how quickly individuals and businesses could get out of debt and build wealth if their income weren't taxed at all and they chose not to spend under this model. Imagine how much less it would cost to produce, and how many more jobs would be created by reducing the burdens on employers. Now imagine all that rapidly saved wealth invested in new business endeavors, and/or capital investments by existing businesses to improve production.

    Incidentally, the IRS would become irrelevant, and quite a few accountants, lawyers, and government employees would end up looking for more honest work, but hey, it would probably be better for their self-esteem. Really, who wants to be associated with the IRS anyway?

    On other issues:

    If they come out too strong and too early against the ACA, O will just wall off and pout for 2 years with his veto stamp close at hand.

    I think choosing which agencies to defund, and in what order is vital to the shrink agenda. If they are too aggressive and cause a swing back in the favor of the left, what will they get accomplished that won't be undone? The same holds true for impeachment - most people will just see it as an abuse of power no matter how justified it might be. Give O more rope to hang himself, and start subtle.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 5 months ago
    Well, you have many "firsts" there. I agree with them, by the way.

    My first would be to slash taxes - both personal and corporate. My second would be to abolish the current tax code. There is so much work to do here...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by JanelleFila 9 years, 5 months ago
    Push, push, push. Republicans have to actually do something (or make Obama the bad guy by vetoing their proposals). Otherwise people will say that the Republicans didn't accomplish anything and vote Democrat for the presidential election.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years, 5 months ago
    One of the **very** first things would be to sponsor a constitutional amendment to remove the unbridled and irresponsible practice of these "Executive orders" to circumvent the law, the constitution, and congress. Without that all the changes can be "re-executive-ordered" back, with a clever failsafe worded into each and every one.

    Without that - whatever else you do, from killing Oblammascare to stopping the migratory influx of illegals to reconstituting the military from a band of yessayers to a Military - will be for naught.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by coaldigger 9 years, 5 months ago
    I cannot see how the "new" congress can be expected to initiate any drastic proposals when they convene in January. I believe that the most effective path would to return to the business of the people and conduct themselves as our representatives were intended. They should prepare and pass a balanced budget that they are prepared to implement and fund. It does not seem to matter if the Executive Branch likes it or not if they do their job and control the purse strings as intended. It is not the purpose of the Executive to pass or fund legislation, but to implement it.

    Obviously, the House will have to make some hard decisions and prioritize where funds will go and to propose tax increases as necessary. ( I would like to see corporate income taxes abolished since consumer-taxpayers pay them anyway and we need to see the cost of government not have it hidden in the cost of goods we purchase.) The Senate should deliberate on these measures and reach agreement with the House. The electorate should be allowed to see the process and be as informed as they desire to be in the details.

    We the people have asked that they do this on our behalf and we should demand that they do this diligently and with our oversight. Seeing this, for the first time in many years would make us believe that these people were doing their job of protecting our rights and greatly increase our faith in government.

    My simple mind cannot begin to fathom all the details and complexity of the Federal Government but I don't think they can either. That doesn't have to be the case if they decide what they want, can afford and are willing to be accountable for. Let the rest languish for cleanup in future deliberations.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mdk2608 9 years, 5 months ago
    One other thing I think I would do is under the national debt clock in Washington DC and New York I would place another clock that counts down the days until Barack Obama leaves office.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 5 months ago
    My dream is that they come up with a plan to slowly shrink gov't in all forms. They would actually make hard decisions about specific prisons and military bases that will close. They also would be dialing back nutrition and Welfare programs at the same slow rate. (They'd have to find a way to keep the president from getting the agencies to cut high-profile things to make the move seem Draconian.)

    The nice thing about this notion is it forces the other side to defend gov't.

    I wish one party would do this.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo