[Ask the Gulch] Am I the only one who thinks our freedoms are being taken from us at every turn? We are no longer free individuals as we might think. Our freedom of speech is limited to that which does not offend rather than as one's right to opine.
Posted by RightMinded71 4 years, 9 months ago to Ask the Gulch
Dobrien, Freedomforall. OldUglyCarl and 25n56il4 are just four who comment regularly.
Welcome to the Gulch!
What makes you think you are the only one.
Try reading some posts. I suggest you tap the categories and read some posts that were discussed previous to your joining the gulch today.
What this country needs is more American history taught in schools, civics taught in high school ( junior year), and a much much wider and diversified choice of political parties. Only then can the public make educated choices to preserve that which was set in stone by the Framers.
How do you know what you've lost if you never knew you had it to begin with. This is the basis on which almost all politicians usurp our freedoms and the younger generation doesn't see what you and I do because they were never taught. In fact, schools today teach self-loathing in our nation and beliefs, we're just another.....
Today my son is a semi-professional classical guitarist, holds an AA in the arts and a BS to teach. He's worked as a music teacher for the last 4 years while he went to NAU. Aside from being an unAmerican leaft leaner, I'm quite proud of the shit.
I'll add, telling them at home is well and good (I did all their lives), its nearly impossible to compete with school, friends, TV and music on a daily basis. When they reach the point of forming their independence the jig is up, hopefully not forever.
Why would you want numerous small political parties? Look what is happening in the countries which have many parties.
At this time, in the US, the fundamental question is capitalism and individual freedoms versus socialism and tyranny. Isn't it? It is not just a coincidence that all fascists called themselves socialists.
We are better off forcing the individual compromises a level lower than the voting boot. Then the winning party gets a majority of the vote, not 30% or less as elsewhere.
Since we are a federal republic of states, electoral college prevents a few very populous states impose their will on all the rest.
There are many critics of the Founding Fathers. To me, they demonstrated a very deep understanding of human nature.
Just my opinions.
Stay well an enjoy and defend your freedoms.
Best wishes.
Sincerely,
Maritimus
I think the free market approach to political party offerings would correct the problem we have.
It's not a perfect solution, and it does have its faults, but I think more availability to alternatives to R and D would be more help than harm.
I cannot agree with you. The basic issue is, in my view, how the country would be governed, not the mechanism of how the governing party is being elected.
I believe that the axiom "the politics is an art of compromise". I think that arriving to many compromises within the parties results in smoother and more efficient governance.
Stay well!
Sincerely,
Maritimus
Oregon's banning R1 housing inside city limits, with only farming outside the city and forest lands (which they will not clean). Wash. state will likely follow, and who knows where else. Our daily lives are becoming controlled by need to save the planet from the faux disaster of clamate change, while no one looks to the Sun for the answers.
I seem to be able to post pretty conservative positions on Facebook that others have been punished for. I can only assume that my manner of discussion isn't triggering any of their automated censors.
Is there an effort to stifle any views but far left? Unquestionably, but civil discourse is so foreign to the instigators minds that they don't recognize what a rational person is saying. If your exchanges are kept rational and dispassionate, they're invisible to the radical left.