Relating altruism to lack of decision making

Posted by  $  servo75 3 months, 1 week ago to Ask the Gulch
18 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

I understand that the looters & moochers in AS were driven by a false valuation of altruism, but another theme is inability or unwillingness to think or make decisions. I'm just not sure how they're connected. The looters were decisive enough when it came to enacting 10-289, or developing Project X, and all their other oppressive laws. Why were the moochers seemingly devoid of any ability to make decisions at all, and how does that connect to their warped view of altruism?


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by  $  jbrenner 3 months ago
    Every year at Florida Tech, one of our humanities professors hosts "Free Speech Day". Part of the event includes "free" pizza. In exchange for the pizza, you must give up your right to say anything. I tried to pay for my pizza one year and was told in no uncertain terms that I could not. Thus, I "protested" from outside the border fence around their looter/moocher enclave. I convinced a couple of students to not take the freebie, but was unsuccessful with one student in one of my classes who should have known better.

    Moochers willingly give up their rights in exchange for altruism from their looter oppressors.

    https://www.floridatoday.com/story/ne...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Lucky 3 months ago
      So, get a free pizza and give up free speech for the duration of that event.
      Not such a bad deal..
      But, give up free speech for ever for a free pizza every day?
      I may be a pessimist but many would take that deal.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  3 months ago
        This reminds me of a conversation I had with a cab driver the day after the 2012 Presidential election. I noted how most everyone who voted for Obama were people wanting to get stuff for free, and the driver responded with something very similar to what you said, "As long as they get their burgers, they're happy, no matter what they give up." It should be noted the driver had an Eastern European accent, possibly from the USSR or Soviet Bloc.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  3 months ago
      On first glance at the article, it looks innocent enough, like the whole point was to show the value of free speech and how we take it for granted. But if that were so they should have allowed you to pay for the pizza. Then again, this is a college campus we're talking about, things are rarely what they seem...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  jbrenner 3 months ago
        By not being allowed to pay for the pizza, the looter oppressor was keeping me, and thus dissent, out in the same way that the Iron Curtain kept us out of Communist Eastern Europe before the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Iron Curtain wasn't just meant to keep the Eastern Europeans in; by controlling knowledge, the Soviets were able to oppress others.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by malonejr 3 months ago
    It isn't so much that these individuals do not want to make decisions. They make decisions that benefit themselves in the short term or until their current source is depleted. It is that they only want to be recognized for making good decisions and not having their dirty laundry showing who made the bad decision.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  blarman 3 months ago
    One of my favorite games is the RPG Dungeons and Dragons. In that system, there are actually two characteristics which measure mental acuity: Intelligence and Wisdom. And they aren't tied in any way shape or form. Intelligence is more an understanding of how things work and is the realm of the Wizard and the Thief/Rogue. Wisdom is the understanding of long-term consequences and ethics and is the realm of the Cleric and Druid. I think it is very apt to use this in the modern world, where there is an abundance of smart/intelligent people who can figure out how things work, but very few who actually consider the ethics of their choices.

    Another way to sum it up is using a line from the movie Jurassic Park: "Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 3 months, 1 week ago
    In AS, Rand gives an impression that may be misleading- that the collectivists cannot think and are generally mentally deprived.
    We see discussion in other recent threads here about the bad business behavior of big-tech, often founded and still run by tech geniuses. The fact is that high IQ, a key to solving defined problems such as in IQ tests, is not related to good sense which is needed to solve large messy poorly defined problems.

    In AS the leading looters seldom made bad decisions (at least in the short term) for themselves but were big on moral posturing, virtue signalling, the skill of appearing to be caring and moral but not making any serious sacrifice themselves. There are sufficient of the sheeple, the followers, who are willing to do that, to save the planet, to give everyone a home, etc.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 3 months ago
    There are many who are capable of making decisions but incapable of making the right one for the right reason. They are clever at getting many people to agree with them to make the decision on who to plunder and who to give it to (of course those in power want it coming to themselves) and consequently lie to themselves about what is the moral choice. When confronted with reality the looters are making irrational decisions but the correct decisions for them to benefit from not working. (I wanted to make a bumper sticker quoting Frederick Bastiat: "Work is a pain" then in small print "People will do what they can to avoid it!") If the decisions benefit those in power even though it is irrational and does not comport with reality they will still make it. It is based on being able to plunder others through the use of 'legal' means available to them through the use of monopolized force of the state.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 3 months ago
    It's a purposeful pattern, where political correctness, social justice, microaggression, etc. instills fear in the believers of making decisions, because they might trigger someone, or not be "fair" to everyone. By giving in to what they're told is best for the collective, they avoid making decisions, and can can feel good about it, because their inaction helps others.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  mminnick 3 months, 1 week ago
    The looter and moochers in AS were for the most part, conditioned to do nothing exvept take from the producers. Very similar to the people on the left in todays society. they are indoctrinated from kindergarten to expect things to be given to them when they whine and demand.
    Consider the Occupy Wall Stree crowd and the current crop of Democrat Socialists. Gimme, gimme, gimme.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  3 months, 1 week ago
      Yes, I understand that but a common theme in AS among the moochers was a stubborn unwillingness or inability to make any type of decision. I would hardly define the Occupy movement as indecisive. They're deciding on the wrong things, but they seemed to be acting quite deliberately. What I'm getting at is how do you go from "I expect alms from everyone else" to "Don't ask me to decide anything." I don't see the relationship between those two.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  Solver 3 months, 1 week ago
      Add to that a psychopathic moral superiority complex as well as actively excluding people that don’t think like them during all their activities toward power, such as science.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Olduglycarl 3 months ago
    They had the ability to enact their evil plans but lacked the: "Give a Damn" to deal with the consequences in my opinion....in fact, that was their whole plan in the first place.

    They were only altruist where the people are concerned but not with themselves...not conscious, no conscience, therefore, not human.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo