Our world is run by...........shhhhsh don't talk about it.
In 2 generations in this land of the free we have altered how we raise and care for Kids.
No longer are children allowed to play in their neighborhoods with out Parental eyes on them.
They can't go to the candy store or playground by themselves. it is vastly different from when I grew up and I am certain many on this forum see the same thing.
It is because of child abduction. the perps are not looking for a friend to play checkers with.
Do you find it unusual that anytime a child abuse ring is exposed it is debunked as false.
Franklin cover up , McMartin daycare , Comet Pizzagate among a few. They always are just a crazy conspiracy Theory. It is easy to debunk, not because they are false it is for three main reasons.
No 1. understandably no one wants to talk about it.
No.2 Its just a crazy conspiracy Theory.
No.3 Many of the victims just disappear.
Cathy O'Brien didn't disappear here is her story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMqaw...
This needs to stop no ifs and or buts.
No longer are children allowed to play in their neighborhoods with out Parental eyes on them.
They can't go to the candy store or playground by themselves. it is vastly different from when I grew up and I am certain many on this forum see the same thing.
It is because of child abduction. the perps are not looking for a friend to play checkers with.
Do you find it unusual that anytime a child abuse ring is exposed it is debunked as false.
Franklin cover up , McMartin daycare , Comet Pizzagate among a few. They always are just a crazy conspiracy Theory. It is easy to debunk, not because they are false it is for three main reasons.
No 1. understandably no one wants to talk about it.
No.2 Its just a crazy conspiracy Theory.
No.3 Many of the victims just disappear.
Cathy O'Brien didn't disappear here is her story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMqaw...
This needs to stop no ifs and or buts.
It is important to understand that the. NISMART reports are based on random surveys. The one you reference is known as NISMART-2 and covers, IIRC, 1999. Rhe NISMART-2 placed the estimate at 115 of which 90 qualified as reported missing. This is the 95% threshold since even the crime data based portion was based on a survey of under 100 departments.
The criminal report studies show a similarly tiny number for total stereotypical a suctions. The DoJ comments on the NISMART data thusly:
“Contrary to the common assumption that abduction is a principal reason why children become missing, the NISMART–2 findings indicate that only a small minority of missing children were abducted, and most of these children were abducted by family members
(9 percent of all caretaker missing children). Close to 3 percent of caretaker missing children were abducted by a nonfamily perpetrator; among these, an extremely small number (90) were victims of stereo- typical kidnapping.”
Again, to get to the “stranger danger” numbers you have to filter out things like kids getting on the wrong bus, bus drivers going off route, and in NISMART-3 parents freaking out because their kid didn’t answer their cell phone. These incidents are counted in the larger “non-family addiction” numbers and are not what people talk or think about when taking about kidnapping by strangers. Yet these are examples taken right out of NISMART surveys that get categorized as “non-family abduction”.
Then again a fear industry is hard to sustain when fewer than 100 out of some seventy million kids fall into the stereotypical abduction category each year. So you have to be vague and broaden the criteria while using laden words like “abduction” to describe non-kidnapping scenarios and let the recipient’s imagination do the work for you.
"These are the same children who demand “safe spaces” so they can only be around non-strangers."
They become adults who need emotional support fluffies and classes in "adulting".
In 24 years they have cared for over 16 dogs mostly mutts who just showed up one to three at a time. Some more skittish than others. The dogs are fiercely protective of them. Now they just have Two.
One went missing for a day and my dad was distraught, thinking it went off to pass away.
Thankfully it returned. Two days later Hurricane Michael blew by and devastated the area. Out of power for a month. Millions and million of trees snapped off ten feet from the ground. 100’ Cedars , Scrub oaks just unreal power. Thank your lucky stars today cause you never know what tomorrow will bring.
There were an estimated 58,200 child victims of non- family abduction, defined more broadly to include
all nonfamily perpetrators (friends and acquaintances as well as strangers) and crimes involving lesser amounts of forced movement or detention in addition to the more serious crimes entailed in stereotypical kidnappings.
■ Fifty-seven percent of children abducted by a non- family perpetrator were missing from caretakers for at least 1 hour, and police were contacted to help locate 21 percent of the abducted children.
■ Teenagers were by far the most frequent victims of both stereotypical kidnappings and nonfamily abductions.
■ Nearly half of all child victims of stereotypical kid- nappings and nonfamily abductions were sexually assaulted by the perpetrator.
These numbers have been pretty consistent since at least the 1980s. But you do have to look beyond the headlines and at the actual data. Most will list "missing" or "non-family missing" figures and let you assume those are all the stereotypical stranger kidnapping, when after digging into the details you'll find that out of the tens of thousands of missing less than two hundred were the stereotypical kidnapping. Part of that is because one kid running away 7 times and getting reported as missing (or even reported as having run away) will be included in the annual total 7 times.
The emphasis on the stereotypical kidnapping is crucial because of how the large numbers are gathered. Beyond the above note of recidivist runaways are the questionnaires used to come up with them. Often things that are not regarded as kidnappings/abductions are classified as non-family abductions. Bus driver take a wrong turn and caretaker called the school when the kid wasn't home on time? That's another (for each kid called about in one category, and each kid not called about on the bus in another). Yet if the victim knew or was acquainted with the perpetrator it is not classified as stereotypical.
So with all of that I am quite curious as to where you got that "average" from and how they came up with it.
Inculcating kids in fear of strangers is a devastatingly bad idea. The kid who grows up afraid to talk to strangers is the kid who can’t engage with new people as an adult, who can’t ask for directions in a new city, who cries foul the moment someone says something they are unsure of scream “micro aggression”. Children raised to fear strangers are the ones who get taken advantage of as adults because they don’t know how to navigate social interactions. These are the same children who demand “safe spaces” so they can only be around non-strangers.
And before someone questions this from a “you don’t have kids then” claim, you’re dead wrong. And yes we raised our girls to not fear strangers but instead to keep a critical and wary eye on their surroundings. Sheltering kids from unfamiliar adults is probably a great way to raise a sociopath. Teaching them how to interact reasonably with adults is probably not a good way to raise a sociopath.
This interview has the answer. https://www.google.com/search?q=norma...
And now that the completion of the commie manifesto plank of taking over the education system is firmly in place, MOST of the new additions to the world population are being taught all the wrong things. The dam (USA) can withstand only so much pressure. I fear we don't have a lot of time left. I feel fortunate to have come along during a great time (50's 60's).
A small town on the east coast of Florida where the fishing was great and all the girls looked great on the beach during the endless summer.
The video accessed by taping the Title of this post A Field McConnell lecture actually is much easier to watch because of his delivery and his taunting of the Perps. He really names the names of the true perps.
They are way to hard to say good by to. Done it too many times. Another one could break our heart.
Absolutely. They are 8 and 10. We encourage them to talk to strangers, but never go off to a secluded place or get near their car. If I see them having a dispute about something like what to play or whether someone cheated, as long as it's getting out of hand I let them handle it.
"If so, you must have total confidence in our changed world (changed for the worse)."
I don't know what total confidence exists for this issue. When they're out, my mind often goes to the worst. I think it will be like that all my life. I am happy that the world has gotten so much safer, in terms of lower crime, less war, less poverty, better communication, better medicine, and so on. Despite living in a safe, more prosperous, more just world that in most of human history, I have a normal level of parental paranoia. It think that may just be a human trait.
"But I suspect you are one of those who ignore serious issues in the name of social engineering, where everyone is happy and content, even though there was just a rape case in your neighborhood."
I don't know what social engineering has to do it, but I am one who will be out after a rape or horrible crime. Most people in my neighborhood are law-abiding. Some of us (several on my block) keep guns as accessible as fire extinguishers for the extremely unlikely scenario will need them. We don't have to be scared.
Again, I thought it was a bit extreme, but I let her talk. She talked about being able to read peoples auras, and just INTUIT things as well as remember things very vividly.
When I watched the Video with Cathy O'Brien, it made my skin crawl. I had officially met an unhealed version of Cathy. Someone who by her own words escaped before they were to kill her! (now, why they did not find her and do something, I am not sure, she feels they were keeping tabs on her to see what, if any, of her memories she recovered. She did not recover many.)
I'm not knowledgeable about the other case, but it does not sound like a random weirdo. It sounds like a teenager running away. It shouldn't be lumped in with weirdos randomly snatching kids off the street.
The extremely rare cases of someone snatching a kid at random stand out because they're emotionally unsettling. They're like mass shootings. People want to know what's the lesson, i.e. what freedom or activity can we take away to prevent such a tragedy ever from happening again. That's the wrong question to be asking. I reminded of disclaimer I signed to participate in one of those walks to fight some disease. It said "I understand walking involves risk." It does, and that's okay.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGNhL...
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=...
Load more comments...