Amazon pulls out of plan to build New York City headquarters after backlash

Posted by mminnick 6 years, 4 months ago to News
40 comments | Share | Flag

New York, be careful what you ask for, you just might get it.


All Comments

  • Posted by ewv 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Businesses, unions and politicians signed the open letter. They are promising that Wesley Mouch will take care of it. The opposition wants more sacrifice, the rest are willing to wait a while. All of them are desperate to curb the more general exodus. Bezos is smart, but a "liberal" who has in the past been willing to deal with the Mouches. The other half of his expansion plans is still on track in the Washington DC area.

    Open letter: https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelp...

    NYT article: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/14/bu...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 6 years, 4 months ago
    I just heard the multiple businesses have taken out an ad in the New Yort newspapers asking Amazon to reconsider its pullout of NYC. If Bezos is smart (he has shown no sign of being dumb) he should stand firm with his decision and avoid NYC like he would the plague/
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Slavery was the reason for the war. The entire political controversy leading up to it was over slavery -- slave states versus free states.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They were looking for a special deal more "friendly" to amazon. Their pragmatism didn't "work".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Stormi 6 years, 4 months ago
    The idiot voters chose an airhead radical, who never does her homework. Then Pocahontas jumped in supporting her. Can people ask for worse, if they truly want and need jobs? This one can be laid at the feet of stupid women politicians. NYC had the diversity of talent, that won them the hhq, but now it will go where maybe some of those people will move to get those jobs. Cortez just opens her mouth and and brains fall out. She never discusses thgs with local people or politicians, always just about her being radical. Marx let his children starve, while he ran off at the mouth rther than work, this time Cortez will let other people's children live in poverty. Keep your mitts off the environment unless you want to be exposed there too.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I couldn’t figure out why amazon wanted to go to a sh$&hole place like New York anyway
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheOldMan 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The problem is why should company A get a different tax rate than company B? Why does Amazon rate get tax incentives when Moose Ears hardware store does not?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 6 years, 4 months ago
    When AOC said "We can replace Amazon with small businesses..' that did it for me folks! Like I said, she IS A NUT!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Suzanne43 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Absolutely! It couldn't have happened to a better city...well, maybe San Francisco or Los Angeles. I wonder what AOC is going to do when she finds that the three billion dollars isn't there for her to spend. Maybe she will go back to her expensive apartment and think about running for president. If you can ruin a city, then why not the entire country...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agree 100%. Stealing less of what was earned from the earner isn't subsidizing that earner. Besides, the elephant in the room these "taxers" miss is no corporation actually pays taxes. Any fat check delivered to the treasury by the corporation is an accumulation of higher prices to the consumer and lower wages/benefits to the worker... that is workers who still have the jobs that weren't eliminated due to excess taxation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You have no idea what Rand's opinion would have been if she had "done the research herself." We do know, however, what her actual opinion was. And we do know her general views on what constitutes a justifiable war. Abolishing the institution of slavery certainly qualifies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Cuomo was defeated by his own contradictions. He and his fellow democrats love to condemn "tax breaks for the rich", but he is willing to offer them in order to claim credit for "economic progress." The progressives called him on his hypocrisy, and rightly so.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So Ayn wasn't infallible and she bought the false history written by the Lincoln lovers. Had she done the research herself she would have changed her opinion about the reason for the war. Slavery was an abomination but it wasn't the reason nor rational justification for the war.
    But she had a larger task and she did it well.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LarryHeart 6 years, 4 months ago
    Cuomo was just trying to promote himself when he said he got Amazon by giving them 3 billion in tax breaks over 10 years,. AOC goes nuts that the rich corps are getting tax breaks. Not fair. .

    What Cuomo failed to mention is that Amazon was going to pay 27 billion in taxes from which the 3 would be taken.

    So NY is now losing 24 Billion in tax revenue and the jobs and the tourism.

    Doofus Math coming from the ASS. - Association of Stupid Socialists
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 6 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I doubt that any former slave would have agreed with you. Nor did Ayn Rand. She wrote:

    "Capitalism cannot work with slave labor. It was the agrarian, feudal South that maintained slavery. It was the industrial, capitalistic North that wiped it out—as capitalism wiped out slavery and serfdom in the whole civilized world of the nineteenth century.

    "What greater virtue can one ascribe to a social system than the fact that it leaves no possibility for any man to serve his own interests by enslaving other men? What nobler system could be desired by anyone whose goal is man’s well-being?" --from Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo