I'd pay to go see them try to shut Sturgis down. That would be a real kick.

Yes I am guilty of that pleasure on occasion as well.

Do I sound like I've read her books. Do I sound uttterly ignorant of Objectivism.
I have read most every word she has written. And, apparently unlike some, I even understood them.

With that said, what lapse or logical error would you like to point out?
Put up or shut up.

https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
Just two, although I've referenced Tracinski on multiple occasions

Reporting the post is in effect "Shutting down the conversation" That is their tactic. We do much better by beating them with their own broom. Zero is entitled to his own opinions and I remember a few days back when someone posted that Antifa was planning on going to the MC Rally in Sturgiss and planning to shut it down. Believe me, Antifa does not have the balls to go where the folks actually fight back, kick ass and don't take names.

But, sometimes it's fun.

I'm at a loss here, can you name those most trusted journalists for me?
Are those trusted journalists the one's that reported that Trump didn't believe our intel agencies?
How do you define, "Dude"?

Got a nice 2 pounder Smallmouth Bass off the dock. Unfortunately not big enough for a family of three, so I ate it for lunch. MMMmmmmm, good.

Have you ever read any of Ayn Rand's books? I can't even imagine someone like you being able to get half way through any of them without having some sort of major breakdown.

And the ones who put the purpose of their jobs ahead dont get elected or re-elected at all !!

My first reaction was to report the post, but then I realized this is how the facts are established, but letting them broadcast their feeble and prejudiced minds. So far every accusation and act they have accused the right of has only been a reflection of themselves. More "people" are moving right than left, that's about all we can ask for, but we have to let them continue to show how they think and what's really in their heart (if they have one).

Politicians are rare if they put the purpose of their jobs (The People) ahead of themselves.

Are you being sarcastic?

++++

"never argue with stupid they will bring you down to their level and beat you with expirience."

It seems to me that our "Intelligence Agencies" overstepped their intellectual boundaries and stepped on their own peckers. Strzok was thinking with his other head with Page and it never fails. Those here who remain studly should take a note from this dork and keep it where it belongs.
Trump was not elected for Sainthood or for being the Messiah Obama never was. He was elected to do a job that needs to be done before this nation crashes and burns. Those who have the most to lose are in full blown fear that he alone will expose the ills of many previous administrations and right this ship. He is alone except for US and there has never been a time in my 66 years when our elected leader needed us more. I could never pull a lever for any democrat and hate myself when ever I pull a lever for a RINO but I will do my part to maintain the majorities in both houses as long as Trump is at the helm. All of this blather about meddling and collusion is just that, BLATHER. Trump stepped out of the lap of luxury to do a job that needs to be done and I don't much give a shit about his ulterior motives. He turned his life and that of his entire family to pure shit for US and we ought to damn well appreciate it because I can't think of another politician who has ever done what he is doing. The man is swimming up shit river through thousands of turds and gaining for us all. It is all about the numbers folks and if you can't add then just look at the numbers because we have never in my life seen them better.

Do you call all Objectivists leftists?
I voiced nothing but the mainstream Objectivist position.

I pointed out that Trump supporters on this site have repeatedly ignored Objectivist criticisms from our most trusted journalists.
I pointed out good reason why one should believe our intelligence agencies rather than Putin's assurances.
I pointed out that Trump supporters now dominate this Objectivist site even while eschewing basic Objectivist tenets.
I pointed out that you now claim a mantel to which you have no right.

You called me a Leftist and ignored my points.
Whatever, dude.

Oh, and just to have it said, like all good Leftists I have voted Republican since 1984.
But I'm not particularly proud of that. You see, I'm an Objectivist - not a Republican.

You missed the main thing these Zero's don't have, Tolerance! The minute they see they are losing an argument, believe me they see it, they go into their BS mode of uncontrolled rage with name calling and beat downs they can't actually get done but like the sound of.

Well said

Maybe because I don’t have a position of power to protect

We have proof Obama submitted the one page FISA request specifically to spy on Trump, which was denied, until they came up with the phony Russian dossier and redid it. I have heard no proof offered as to who in russia meddled from Russia, we need WikiLeaks!I do know that Obama used our money to try to oust Bibi, succeeded in Canada getting his man, and actually put Marxism in Central America to the detriment of the residents. He was not out spreading democracy, rather Marxism. Why is that okay, but Russian expected meddling not? If Hillary had not set up her own server hacked by many, it would not be open season on our cyberware. China hacked government computers during Obama, no squawk on that. The government spies on us, China spies on them, why not expect the same of Russia, and acting mouthy on a vist, as did Chris Wallace, is not going to stop it. Who is going to stop Obama, as he is still going rogue and trying to oust leaderships, including the sitting POTUS?

My bad. I'll be good.

Thank you for your passion Zero. Now, please let's get under control the cursing and the threats (e.g. "one of us would be on the ground"). Thanks.

Galt's Gulch Code of Conduct: https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/faq#...

This is what I told my sister when she presented me with an article from an Objectivist who is anti-Trump. She said I did not honor her vision for America: "I honor her opinion very much. You and the others on the left are her antithesis and in my opinion you have no idea what you are saying. You are someone who has read Atlas Shrugged many times and just doesn't get it. Many, and I mean many of us Ayn Randers appreciate our President very much. and in many of our opinions, the best we can do for right now in our history. To have a real constitutional minded president who loves liberty, self-made men, (and women), Capitalism as our form of gov't, one who does not embrace socialism and enslaving half of the country to work for the other half would be just about impossible right now. These are the things Ayn Rand would look for. This man or woman does exist, but would never make it in our political nightmare of a world. It will have to crash and burn first so it can rebuild from the ashes. Just look at what our President has gone through."

I have not heard one fact put forth yet to support this claim. Just indictments and this is not proof. We have meddled in many, many elections and governments. What else do you think our CIA is doing? This is just so bogus!