What they fail to confess is that shouting out questions, good or bad, has Never been allowed at a venue held "In The Oval Office"!!!

Why do they "Shout" in the first place...competition?...thought the left was against, "Competition.
Take a Number and shut up until your called...works at the butcher counter at stop and stab!

They have to hang together or they will almost certainly hang separately.

Never listen to or watch Joe and Shepard Smith is on FOX here at 3 PM. I switch to FOX business for Smith's hour long show because I don't need a dose of liberal speak. I disagree that FOX is a conservative network at all with the few exceptions of some evening shows.FOX does employ a bunch of pure liberals sprinkled among some others who are somewhat conservative. OANN is a station I do totally enjoy and some of the hosts like Graham Ledger and Liz Wheeler between 8-10 PM sure can get rowdy with the liberals they try to discuss topics with. If you don't get OANN, One America News Network, DEMAND IT from your provider.

I might be one of the most cynical people you'll ever meet. And I attribute this to my extraordinarily sensitive bullshit detector. For me it works like Neutron Activation Analysis which is an analytical instrument that can detect one or two atoms or molecules in a trillion.

Some would say that I'm biased, but in actuality I can tell when someone is regurgitation Dumbocrat or Progressive-Socialist nonsense simply by the way they add inflection to their sentences.

It's a gift, and a curse. The problem is that those failed ideas have literally become part of the lingua franca of everyday society. If you've ever driven through hog country down south, you know that the smell is simply inescapable.

MSNBC and CNN have a particularly warped view of what a "Journalist" is. Merriam Webster defines a Journalist as:
1 a person engaged in journalism; especially : a writer or editor for a news medium
2 a writer who aims at a mass audience

Definition 1 can be exempted, they make news not report news. Definition 2 isapplies, they do write for a mass audience (the progressive left wing of the Democrat party.
Note that the second definition does not include the word NEWS. Given their propensity to report things that are not true leaving news out of their vocabulary and definition of what they do is the right thing to do.

Freedom without responsibility is freedom corrupted and soon lost. This certainly applies to the First Amendment as utilized by certain members of the press. It is said a free press is important for a democracy, but I'd qualify that by saying a responsible free press is important for a democracy whereas an irresponsible press is a danger.

I watched the news of what happened in the Oval Office and could clearly see that CNN info-babe was irresponsible with her freedom and corrupted it. Therefore, she lost it. Too bad for her! She deserved to be thrown out and invoking the First Amendment to play a CYA game for bad behavior is equally irresponsible. The Constitution is NOT a suicide pact and should never be allowed to be used as one.

Shepherd Smith is a class A act. He tells it like he sees it, and backs up what he sees with accurate reporting. He is wrong, though, and I would debate him anytime someone gives me the same resources that he has.
He is a worthy opponent, and a person who is not a loudmouthed bumblebrain as most lefties are. Cut him some slack but defeat him with your superior knowledge and intellect.Not everyone will agree with the righties, so don't get into a shouting match with idiots.

If the President holds a press conference with a foreign leader or anyone similar, only questions regarding this guest can be asked. This is only fair to the guest. All other questions should be pointedly ignored.
When it is just the President, he can just pointedly ignore questions he doesn't like.
Ignore the whiney vultures. Just give 'em a screw you smile and move on.

When schooled in how to think by socialist colleges and universities and believing that they are saving the world their views will always be part of their story telling. It is obvious that they are for the socialists and against any who even appear to be against their failed philosophy. Their reporting of the news is; let's make socialists look good, libertarians look bad so that we can help steer the country to utopia.

I don't like Shep anyway. His presentation of the news really irks me, he seems to be a CNN reporter hanging out at Fox.

Here's some evidence refuting Shep Smith's glowing view of the media, based on the conditions under which they learned their craft: https://www.nas.org/articles/homogeno...

"Shep" eh? Isn't that the name for a trusty dog?