Peter Strzoc to testify

Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 9 months ago to History
22 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag


120821AE-5C3A-4089-A6BA-722B127CD56D.jpeg
Public learned today.
Why?
What must be finished?
Why still employed?
Purpose?
LP released after…..
PS will be released after…..
Just because something isn’t public doesn’t mean….
[DOJ texts / emails]
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2...
C_A down [19] this year alone.
When will records be unsealed?
SHOCK AND AWE.
Projection.
Attack POTUS Foundation (acting NY AG (told)).
Why?
CF Foundation [Nightmare Awake] [slush fund / children].
Claim: Politcal attack re: case against POTUS.
Projection.
POTUS & Russia.
Why?
HRC Hussein etc & Russia.
Claim: Political attack re: case against POTUS.
Pattern.
Q


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 9 months ago
    Anybody watched Trey Gowdy's boiling of Horowitz?

    He spent a considerable time on the Strzok affair: it turns out there is much more to it than what we know from the papers, in addition to the one liner that "No, no we'll prevent it".

    Those tow, Strozk and Page were carrying on for a long time, in vitriolic resistance to Trump being elected president.

    Gowdy's intention was to show Horowitz how negligent he was by NOT FINDING bias.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 9 months ago
      What if they discussed the assassination of the President?
      What if the optics in DC need to be focused?
      More to come. the left will Riot and it will be quelled before summer ends.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 5 years, 9 months ago
    It is a shame that what once was considered the nation's premier law enforcement organization has become little more than a partisan cesspool thanks to its "politically tainted leadership". Back in the early to mid eighties, the FBI had just dug itself out of the political mess of the 1970's and was lead by a "real" leader who cared about its reputation and mission. Judge Bill Webster salvaged the bureau with leadership that exuded nothing but integrity, fairness and innovation. This was the antithesis of what Comey, Strozk and the rest of the politically corrupt leadership that struck its deal with the devil under the Bushes, Clinton and Obama. The deep state exists, make no mistake about it! It is definitely time for a leader such as Bill Webster to emerge and salvage what is left of this once great organization! They must once again enforce the law faithfully and purge the disastrous political garbage its leaders apparently have been playing! For what its worth!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 5 years, 9 months ago
    As I understand it Romeo has the lovey-dovey gene and cannot help himself, but Trump failed to recognize that as a legitimate genetic fault, hence both Romeo and Juliet's hatred of him. You got a better explanation for this utter stupidity then let me know. Plus they put the stupidity in on traceable emails. Morons? Yes.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 9 months ago
      The little that has been revealed is damning.
      What if this little group was a bit bigger and they discussed 187'ing the 45 th POTUS.

      In addition, a couple of dozen FBI folks are salivating to testify before Congress of abuses to
      The rule of law during the Past decade.

      People missed the fact that the IG report indicates a bias regarding the FBI and the Russian probe.
      That investigation is still ongoing and the the IG's report part 2 "Russia" will not be released until RR and RM is finis.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Herb7734 5 years, 9 months ago
        Even the suspicion of bias disqualifies anyone on the investigation. And there is solid evidence in B&W not just suspicion . The entire investigation is tainted and should be disregarded.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 8 months ago
    Strzok decided to pull a Lerner in his "testimony"

    He did not claim the 5th but he refused to answer any questions on the advice of counsel.

    Wonder why did he appear - he claims he did it voluntarily. To make sure everyone knows he won't answer questions?

    Lisa Page is still refusing to appear. On what ground can she do that?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 5 years, 8 months ago
      She has been dodging the suppena as fed agents had to visit her home 3 times before being served.
      The congressional committee can site her for contempt . To not show up is a clear indication of an attempt to conceal the truth . It is an interesting show that's for sure. I trust the plan. #WWG1WGA
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo