A leftist explains why he uses the race card

Posted by Solver 8 years ago to Politics
18 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

“The reason I talked about race in that particular characterization because there's a particular way in which I have come to a city I don't know if there are a lot of black people out here. Not sure. But I constantly come to places and spaces that are not my natural habitat other than intellectual engagement and the love and the fury of rhetorical engagement yes. But I often go into hostile spaces where people will not vote in favor from my particular viewpoint because I'm interested as an individual of breaking down barriers so that people can understand just how complicated it is. So what I'm saying to you is that I would invite you in terms of the surrender of your privilege to give you a specific a specific response come with me to a black Baptist Church. Come with me to a historically black college. Come to me to an to an indigenous or First Nations community where we're able to engage in some of the lovely conversation, but also to listen and hear. And when I added race to that I was talking about the historically events’ inability to acknowledge others’ pains equally to the one that they are presently enduring. As a human being I love you my brother, but I stand by my comment.”
- Michael Dyson

https://youtu.be/vJBIy58PJQI


All Comments

  • Posted by Leonid 8 years ago
    Racism is a crude form of tribalism and collectivism. No wonder than for the leftist who is a collectivist by definition , racism is a last asylum
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bassboat 8 years ago
    Rambling jibberish. I would go with him to church, etc., but would he sit down for a conversation on real solutions to address the problem?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years ago in reply to this comment.
    +1
    Absolutely. Thesedays, the (radical) left is the primary enabler of racism. To them this ploy is a rent seeker’s paradise.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by JuliBMe 8 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Being judged based on immutable traits is the definition of a racist. The people who talk about racism the most (LEFTISTS) OBVIOUSLY are VERY concerned with something that can't be changed. But, that's how they want it because they make A LOT of money off this issue. If they would just shut up about skin color, 90% of racism would disappear.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years ago in reply to this comment.
    So true. A racist is one who pre-judges people based on their race, or color of their skin, instead of on the content of their character. No one is magically exempt, regardless of what some professors profess.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by JuliBMe 8 years ago
    Leftist word salad meant to confuse and shut down a conversation. It's easy to identify the racists in any society. It's the people who incessantly bring up skin color in every conversation. Just like this guy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years ago in reply to this comment.
    He just wants what’s owed to him by “the government.” It’s called, privilege seeking, Or some know it better as, rent seeking.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years ago
    Here we see someone trying to defend their position using some fragmented story (narrative) instead of a logical reasoned out on point argument.

    To most this makes little sense. To others this is award-winning stuff.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 8 years ago
    What a complete load of bullshit! OMG. My favorite was...."I often go into hostile spaces where people will not vote in favor from my particular viewpoint ". You particular viewpoint is that whitey owes you a living and none of those "people" you refer to ever owned a slave or ever did anything to you you pampered spoiled race baiting Douche! Also....no consideration that the reason these "People" wont vote for his particular viewpoint, might have some actual validity. No, his way is the only way that is correct and worthy of any discussion. Screw anybody that doesn't agree with him. Sounds just like those Antifa people who wont answer questions at their demonstrations.

    Should be more properly titled....The inner workings of a race pimp!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 8 years ago
    To study this from the other side and in more detail, take a look at:
    http://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2018/...

    Quotes-
    . . . breast-beating, so long as it does not lead in practice to any tangible
    self-sacrifice, such as financial penalty or that requiring personal effort, has
    its own pleasures and rewards . .. it allows the breast-beater to believe that
    he is good, indeed exceptionally so: for how can anyone who assumes so much
    guilt be other than a very good person?
    . . . the enunciation of unctuous pieties will at best do nothing positive and
    at worst be inflammatory.

    But, as a one-liner, the comment by exceller puts it best.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Fully agree. Words have meaning. But deriving any rational meaning out of this word salad seems impossible.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 8 years ago
    When environment becomes more important than the dialogue itself, you know things are backwards.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 8 years ago
    During the Obamanation's 8-year reign of terror, me dino heard a lady on my car radio call Hannity to say she would not criticize King Barry's policies out of fear of being called a racist.
    That lefty "shut up and sit down" cheap dirty trick does manipulate some people.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 8 years ago
    What a load of garbage!

    This guy never learned how to express himself clearly with clarity.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo