Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 3 months, 2 weeks ago
    He used a car. If he had used a gun the NYT and CNN would have been all over it.
    Gosh, you mean killing doesn't require a gun? You mean it can be done with common everyday tools like a car?
    Banning guns doesn't help?
    That's amazing !
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 3 months, 1 week ago
    Did he use an assault car? What kind of cars do we need to ban to make everyone safe?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by jdg 3 months, 1 week ago
      They've already done that. The safest car you can drive is "a tank." But NHTSA regulations since the Nixon era have gone out of their way to ban sturdy cars, so that today cars are literally required to suffer expensive damage from any collision at 5 mph or above. The leftists' idiots idea of safety is that no driver be allowed to have confidence that his vehicle can keep running after somebody hits it.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  allosaur 3 months, 2 weeks ago
    Well, gee. This terrorist did not use a gun, especially not a semiautomatic AR15 with a pistol grip that's supposed to be EEK! an ASSAULT WEAPON! like a fully automatic AK-47.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  3 months, 2 weeks ago
    A terrorist drove into the crowd in Muenster Germany killing at least 3 people. The NYT did not think it was newsworthy and did not report it.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo