- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 5.
The law is entirely on the side of the authorities in this surveillance, with many court decisions that establish that we have no assurance of privacy when we are in public. The problem today is that these laws were mostly written to protect the press and us if we take a photo that innocently includes some unrelated person in the image. That's a far cry from what we see today, the intentional recording of all people who CAN be recorded, "just it case" the data is needed latter.
I think there's a great difference between casual recording and intentional surveillance. I don't think that a good case to defend these actions have been put to the SCOTUS, but I believe it will be soon.
A key component will be the use of drones that can record us in our own back yards and even the drones that can bounce a laser off our window and record conversations within. I certainly think these are blatantly unconstitutional, but we will see how they judge.
It is much, much deeper and tougher than Wikileaks, Snowden, twitter etc.
I would like to suggest that you read Chapter 22 in the book "Bell Curve" by Herrnstein and Murray (The Free Press 1994). If that chapter motivates you, you can read the previous 21, which I found enormously edifying and thought provoking.
Let us know what you think.
"I love my Obamacare". Wish I could have seen the bone head that soiled his car with that.
In the book "Nineteen Eighty-Four", the official calendar date is set as deemed necessary by the Ministry of Truth.
That means the actual year is forgotten, and meaningless. It could be this year. It could even be the next.
The pinnacle of this analogy struck me most profoundly to be the case when (what I oft mockingly call) "our elite betters" of a virtual oligarchy crammed the unaffordable Affordable Health Care Act down our throats. Princess Pelosi provided the crowning touch of this Obamanation "audacity of change" when she proclaimed, "Let us pass this bill to read what is in it (etc.)"
In our small town almost every intersection that is equipped with a signal light is also equipped with a camera that's connected to the city services office, police dept. and county sheriff's office. In the business district the number of cameras are double that with many mounted on every civic office building, and those within each of those buildings and offices. Add in the recent advances in facial recognition software and there's little privacy in public anymore.
There's no question that if you are using any electronic service, you have zero privacy. And for us in the Gulch - the only thing we have is camaraderie.
Load more comments...