Kill Anything That Moves: Dereliction of Duty, Part One
But what about the military’s upper echelon? How did it acquiesce to a war that was destroying the country it was ostensibly meant to save, killing the people it was ostensibly meant to protect, clearly and understandably turning allies into enemies, and taking the lives and souls of the soldiers in their charge who had to fight it? Where were they, and where have they been since then as the US government has repeated the same mistaken policies over and over again? Have they supported and defended “the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” bearing “true faith and allegiance” to the same?
This is an excerpt. For the complete article, please click the above link.
This is an excerpt. For the complete article, please click the above link.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Dang I was feeling really good!
"I'm free! I'm free!"
Before graduation he was assigned MOS 0311 for rifleman.
Another recruit who talked all the time about killing people (and even slugged another private) did not like the MOS he was a signed. "A cook?!" he cried.
Me dino had to bite my lip to keep from laughing.
Three were promised "aviation guaranteed" by a recruiter. It was a lie. I did not feel like laughing at them.
Since I ended up a supply clerk for a satellite communications squadron at a Marine air base, I got closer to "aviation" than those guys did.
and, as such, is a violation of the rights of man.
I keep hearing that we are "still" "technically" at
war with North Korea. We were never technically
at war with them in the first place.Because that was not a declared war. It was called a "police
action". Of course, people were still killing and
being killed, I just mean it is silly to say that we
are "technically" at war with North Korea. If
Kim Jong Un keeps behaving the way he has
been doing, we may have the declared one soon.
You had it way harder than I did.
Having enlisted I experienced a lot of things about life I probably would never have otherwise. (Not all good by the way.) Because of the unpopularity of the Vietnam War, the Air Force was having a hard time recruiting officers and so opened opportunities for enlisted men to get a college education and a commission. As someone who had barely graduated from high school, and who had no particular great skill (I was a draftsman as an enlisted man) I thought the college/commission thing sounded pretty good and I did it. But this was me, and I was very lucky all through my time in service.
What the draft did to me and lots of other young men was steal our youth. Without it I could have gotten the kind of job I wanted and lived a very different life. I was happy to see it end so that it did not take some of my younger brothers.
But the other thing missing in a non-draft world is the sense of the military being temporary. During the years of the draft, whenever men met one of the first things was “Where you from?” because we were from all over the country and had experiences and stories to share from a lot of different view points. Example: one of my roommates grew up in North Dakota where he didn’t have running water or electricity until his teens – I’d never lived in a place without those.
The all volunteer military has a different feel to it. Where you are from means less then ‘what was your last assignment?’ I sense a loss of the thinking that it’s all temporary and everyone will go ‘home’ when it’s over. And what I really think is that we should not be at war all the time.
I was born in 1943. During my entire lifetime, the US has been at some sort of conflict. You might puts some dates on various conflicts, but really we’ve been doing some sort of war somewhere. Even though Congress has not ‘declared war’ there are armed conflicts that we are involved with pretty much all the time. It is my belief that the munitions makers keep promoting these conflicts and their congressional servants keep pouring our money into them.
When we got on the bus, some very worried draftee asked the draft board lady, "Mrs. Kennedy, will any of us have to go into the Marines?"
To that, Mrs. Kennedy said, "Don't worry, they have not taken any Marines for a whole month."
When we got to the army base, a lieutenant advised us all that "This is the end of the month when we take Marines."
The worry wart (who was lied to?) was not diverted into the Marines.
When my name was called, I actually imagined myself screaming "Gung ho!" while suicidally charging a Viet Cong machine gun nest.
What I had yet to learn was that Marines were being pulled out of Vietnam at the time.
I was trained at Parris Island, received more training at Camp Lejeune and became a supply clerk for a satellite communications squadron at the Cherry Point air base, never leaving the Carolinas save for going home on leave.
I never wanted in in the first place.
Made a lemon into lemonade corporal under meritorious conditions.
Looked good on job resumes.
It was how I described it among more draftees after hearing the enlistees take their oath.
This happened way back in 1969. If I'm wrong, so be it.
I was trained to be a supply clerk after Parris Island and some advanced weapons training in case I did go to Vietnam, which I didn't.
I never got out of the Carolinas. One time I mentioned to a sergeant that I wouldn't mind getting a transfer to see California.
Told I would have to first "ship over" for four years, I was all like~ naw!~I like it here at Cherry Point, NC, just fine.
I reduced my two years of involuntary servitude by two months by taking what was called a "school cut" and went to college, letting Uncle Sam pay for it with the GI Bill.
Making corporal "under meritorious conditions" looked good on job resumes, and I had the paperwork to prove it.
Handed a lemon, make lemonade. Glad I didn't have to die for nothing like too many others did.
I think that is true. It seems like they had a flawed strategy. In They Marched Into Sunlight and American Soldier, I read that the US has a known policy of not attacking the enemy or even pursing the enemy in a battle in certain areas. So the VC could stay in those areas until it was in their interest to fight. If it became not in their interest and they were able to retreat, they could stop the fighting whenever it suited them. So the US ended up responding to what the VC did, being brought into and out of battle by the enemy, rather than taking the initiative. This is exactly the opposite of The Art of War.
Nobody paid attention to Vietnam's history and the thousand year occupation by China. The fear of repeating the Korea scenario prevented operations across the border, with an administration paranoid about Chinese intervention. Mining Haiphong harbor, which could have hampered Russian efforts to resupply North Vietnam was likewise avoided, out of fear of Russian casualties. There was no coherent strategy or set of goals, except to rain down death and destruction.
We even fumbled the final diplomatic solution. After the Paris peace accords and the acceptance of a two state Vietnam, Congress sabotaged South Vietnam by refusing to honor the agreement to continue to supply them with needed arms and ammunition. The South Vietnamese held off the invasion by the North until they ran out of ammunition and supplies. No wonder any U.S. allies today harbor a degree of mistrust in us.
Load more comments...