Bookmark This: Over 400 Links Google Doesn’t Want You To Visit
Hmmm, makes me WANT to visit these sites.
8 or 10 of my best resource sites are on this list. The first 3 under News and Politics have actually turned left or 'alt' left but:
Reason Mag? come on!
http://Judicialwatch.org?
RT ???
US News?
Financial sites, preparedness sites, health sites???
Suspicious 0bservers?
What do these sites have in common?...Truth? Reasonable discussion, fact searching??
Not all are political...hell, they'd even help lefties if they'd listen.
How the heck are We not on this list? You know they Hate AR.
How did Mike Rowe not end up here too?
Ya think google has been co-opted? Are the conspiracy theories about google true?
Google has gone far alt left, definitely anti human as far as I am concerned.
Your Thoughts...pssst...keep it quiet though, you may end up on this list.
What's next?...books, historical sites, colleges that don't revise history?
8 or 10 of my best resource sites are on this list. The first 3 under News and Politics have actually turned left or 'alt' left but:
Reason Mag? come on!
http://Judicialwatch.org?
RT ???
US News?
Financial sites, preparedness sites, health sites???
Suspicious 0bservers?
What do these sites have in common?...Truth? Reasonable discussion, fact searching??
Not all are political...hell, they'd even help lefties if they'd listen.
How the heck are We not on this list? You know they Hate AR.
How did Mike Rowe not end up here too?
Ya think google has been co-opted? Are the conspiracy theories about google true?
Google has gone far alt left, definitely anti human as far as I am concerned.
Your Thoughts...pssst...keep it quiet though, you may end up on this list.
What's next?...books, historical sites, colleges that don't revise history?
These sites webmasters need to rethink their strategies. Sorry to piss on the conspiracy theorist's barbeque charcoal, but there's nothing deeply sinister happening here.
I used to regularly visit a number of the sites on the list -- but I stopped because they became so damn annoying, I had to stop.
Although, I wouldn't throw out the intent so quickly...these sites are not stupid...except for the first 3 anyway.
Jan, uses DuckDuckGo
(I use this because it does not recall my preferences. I want to read views that do not just reinforce my own opinions.)
We not only have gaseous fat heads in Google but also at MSNBC, CNN, PBS, the old time big three networks of TV, The New York Times, my local The Birmingham News, et als the other propaganda pushing lib fake news pompous primates, who'd screech like enraged apes over Mrs. Trump's hurricane high heels when there's nothing else to defame that day.
I kinda liked the Hurricane Heels...might have started a new trend...would eliminate the need for water catchers, (pant cuffs at the bottom).
https://www.amazon.com/Ivanka-Trump/b...
Causes me dino to think of the Brits once singing "Yankee Doodle" to snub American revolutionaries, who thought that song just dandy.
In other words~NYAH!
So...I'm going to post the Klingon Hiltery poster in honor of the new ST series.
Let you know if the image gets blurred.
PS...haven't been on FB since I came here to the Gulch.
The list of links isn't claimed to be blackballed by Google, it's presented as a suggested bookmark list as an alternative to google searches. "Below you will find a comprehensive list of great sites broken down by category that do an excellent job in their respective field. I urge everyone to bookmark this page and make it their go to when searching for news on politics, health and prepping."
That is the opposite of the article's misleading headline, repeated on this forum, "Bookmark This: Over 400 Links Google Doesn’t Want You To Visit".
The quotes from google are guidelines used in searches for factual information, they don't support the claim that it "doesn't want you to visit" them:
"Pages that directly contradict well established scientific or medical consensus for queries seeking scientific or medical information, unless the query indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.
"Pages that directly contradict well-established historical facts (e.g., unsubstantiated conspiracy theories), unless
the query clearly indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint."
Yet this is called a "Gestapo like ... plan to suppress any information they deem unfit for readers" in an alleged "war on truth [that] has reached a fever pitch as Google has made it their mission to annihilate the independent media".
One can question google's standards for what it regards as "well established" science, medical practice and history, but that isn't what the article is about.
SO, adapt2030, the Blaze have already reported these acts and have appealed.
Do some google searches and find out. I refuse to intentionally use google for tracking and misdirecting my searches.
https://static.googleusercontent.com/...
Time will tell, I would be suspiciously observant...(pun intended).
If Google really "doesn't want you to visit" the links the article mentions, it should be no problem to find a reference or two for this assertion.
As for the lamestream minority media...they are rarely if ever credible.
https://www.rt.com/news/173308-hidden...
There was this duplicate article on USNews as well.
http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News...
http://www.eutimes.net/2014/07/websit...
100's of examples can be found and 100's or articles on this problem, many of which are from the websites being blocked or having their writers blocked.
There is so much about this...I had to consider it was probable.
-Pages that directly contradict well-established historical facts (e.g., unsubstantiated conspiracy theories), unless the query clearly indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.
These two guidelines provided by Google should set off alarm bells to anyone who has a thirst for knowledge or anyone that has the audacity to examine both sides of a topic." [bolded by me]
There is nothing sinister about this. If I'm searching for medical information, I don't want to read about homeopathy. If I'm searching for history, I don't want to read about holocaust denial. The text says unless the query indicates that. So if they're honest in their implementation, if I search for info on these topics, I can still get it. They're just keeping it from showing up in ordinary searches. I don't want "both sides of a topic." If I search for the orbit of the planets, I don't want to read about the other "side" that says the earth is flat.
It's good for a laugh anyway...otherwise you wouldn't know there are creatures that believe that...therefore, you wouldn't recognize the language and get sucked in.
I know already you are going to tell me you won't get sucked in and because you are a gulcher, I also know your not a progressive.
The other point you are missing is that progressives and liberals do not follow their own stated rules. That's my observation anyway.