A lot of lefty sites are just as agravating. I agree they aught to rethink the practice. Can't stand it when your reading a page and something is playing and you have no idea where it's coming from.

Although, I wouldn't throw out the intent so quickly...these sites are not stupid...except for the first 3 anyway.

Also, statistically, there are more liberals and more liberal activity online than conservative. If you rank sites by clicks, then you end up with liberal sites preferred. No need for conspiracy.

Jan, uses DuckDuckGo
(I use this because it does not recall my preferences. I want to read views that do not just reinforce my own opinions.)

Like puffed rice or cheese puffs...Opps! I suppose that's racist or cheeseaphobic these days.

I kinda liked the Hurricane Heels...might have started a new trend...would eliminate the need for water catchers, (pant cuffs at the bottom).

I going to try a test, now FB only let's my stuff go to friends, anything I used to publish Public would vanish into history.
So...I'm going to post the Klingon Hiltery poster in honor of the new ST series.
Let you know if the image gets blurred.

PS...haven't been on FB since I came here to the Gulch.

Thanks ycandrea and temlakos...hadn't heard of that site. I sometimes use goodgopher.com though.

This isn't the first time an article with an inflammatory headline from an hysterical site with no credibility has been promoted on this forum. This forum is supposed to be in support of Ayn Rand's philosophy of reason and objectivity, not kook fads and conspiracy theories.

The list of links isn't claimed to be blackballed by Google, it's presented as a suggested bookmark list as an alternative to google searches. "Below you will find a comprehensive list of great sites broken down by category that do an excellent job in their respective field. I urge everyone to bookmark this page and make it their go to when searching for news on politics, health and prepping."

That is the opposite of the article's misleading headline, repeated on this forum, "Bookmark This: Over 400 Links Google Doesn’t Want You To Visit".

The quotes from google are guidelines used in searches for factual information, they don't support the claim that it "doesn't want you to visit" them:

"Pages that directly contradict well established scientific or medical consensus for queries seeking scientific or medical information, unless the query indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.

"Pages that directly contradict well-established historical facts (e.g., unsubstantiated conspiracy theories), unless
the query clearly indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint."

Yet this is called a "Gestapo like ... plan to suppress any information they deem unfit for readers" in an alleged "war on truth [that] has reached a fever pitch as Google has made it their mission to annihilate the independent media".

One can question google's standards for what it regards as "well established" science, medical practice and history, but that isn't what the article is about.

Here is their handbook index. We do have complaints of ads being demonetize, no sharing or commenting or just outright being blocked.
SO, adapt2030, the Blaze have already reported these acts and have appealed.

Do some google searches and find out. I refuse to intentionally use google for tracking and misdirecting my searches.

https://static.googleusercontent.com/...

"I don't want to read about the other "side" that says the earth is flat."

It's good for a laugh anyway...otherwise you wouldn't know there are creatures that believe that...therefore, you wouldn't recognize the language and get sucked in.

I know already you are going to tell me you won't get sucked in and because you are a gulcher, I also know your not a progressive.

The other point you are missing is that progressives and liberals do not follow their own stated rules. That's my observation anyway.