"People Who Believe They Are Genetically Different"/ The Axis of Evil - A New Definition Needed
Here is something to chomp on over this weekend.
What is your view of this...do you think there is a smidgen of truth here?
These creatures are what I call...descendants of the Nephilim, the great unwashed, the delete ruleless class and of course, the parasitical humanoids that I have observed to possess no conscience, not conscious, no mind and brain in a body only creatures that are not human in the same ways we are. "We" of course are: the value producing, creating, true, elite on the streets.
You know whom they are, our rulers, those that AR talked and wrote about, the central bankers, the kings and queens, those that hide behind others and in deep dark corners like the Hapsburg's, the Rothschild's, fake Jews and fake people. They really do think they are not human and in fact, they very well may not be...many follow their lineage back to Nimrod of Babylon, a self professed Nephilim.
But ask your self, could you think the way they think, do what they do, steal what they steal, act the way they act...even in your wildest dreams?
If your answer is NO!, then welcome to the conscious human race.
My point before you read this section of a Global watch report...there seems to be something to all this...they are really not like us, many have said it, we have observed it. Do they really represent mankind?, Human kind? Are the clintonians, bubuskies, obobo's, the uoons, the neverdidajobs, the sorasses and the rest of their ilk anything like us?
I think not.
"However it is critical to realize that the Global Domination Agenda is not dependent upon the creation of private bankers. It is in essence the belief of a families that sit hidden by the private bankers who have had their worldview institutionalized in man-made laws and kept in place by bribes and threats and presented by private banking oligarchs. It has become in some ways a “legal mafia” because violations of contract integrity, persons and property are supported by legislation. Just a few examples are: fraud and embezzlement (fiat money, swaps, short sales, derivatives, subsidies, bailouts, corporate personhood, etc.) theft (involuntary taxation, eminent domain land seizures), kidnapping (military draft, extraordinary rendition, Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act...), assault (mandatory vaccines, mandatory pesticide sprays, covert Chemtrails spraying, sobriety checkpoints...) torture (“enhanced interrogation techniques”)."
"This is the real true root of the axis of evil..................The global domination agenda."
"Over 400 years ago, the Florentine statesman Niccolo Machiavelli engaged in a profound
study of methods used by various rulers to attain power ... The findings of Machiavelli and
other students of power decree that to obtain power it is essential to ignore the moral laws
of man and of God; that promises must be made only with the intention to deceive and to
mislead others to sacrifice their own interests; that the most brutal atrocity must be
committed as a matter of mere convenience; that friends or allies must be betrayed as
matter of course as soon as they have served their purpose. But, it is also decreed that
these atrocities must be kept hidden from the common people except only where they are
of use to strike terror to the hearts of opponents; that there must be kept up a spurious
aspect of benevolence and benefit for the greater number of the people, and even an
aspect of humility to gain as much help as possible."
"People Who Believe They Are Genetically Different"
"When you hear terms, families of power, global elite, bloodlines of the illuminati, black nobility etc, it is likely that you are thinking of royalty, wealth, affluence and shadow government. However what many people do not realize is that the theological belief of the global elite, is one in which they believe they are genetically and spiritually different to the human race."
"If you study the history behind the evolution of these families and their networks of power, it becomes very apparent that they have a very deep disgust and contempt for the human race. This is borne out of the fact that they affiliate themselves with a belief that they are not fully human, and genetically different to the human race."
"It sounds bizarre to say the least, but once you understand this crucial point then everything starts to make sense in regards to why the architects of the new world order simply have no disregard for life. The human race is seen merely as cattle and the loss of life whether through major wars, genocide or manipulated acts of terror, are simply seen as the un-avoidable casualties of a war to drive through their bizarre agenda."
No need to buy the report, but if you should want to: http://www.globalwatchweekly.com/thed...
What is your view of this...do you think there is a smidgen of truth here?
These creatures are what I call...descendants of the Nephilim, the great unwashed, the delete ruleless class and of course, the parasitical humanoids that I have observed to possess no conscience, not conscious, no mind and brain in a body only creatures that are not human in the same ways we are. "We" of course are: the value producing, creating, true, elite on the streets.
You know whom they are, our rulers, those that AR talked and wrote about, the central bankers, the kings and queens, those that hide behind others and in deep dark corners like the Hapsburg's, the Rothschild's, fake Jews and fake people. They really do think they are not human and in fact, they very well may not be...many follow their lineage back to Nimrod of Babylon, a self professed Nephilim.
But ask your self, could you think the way they think, do what they do, steal what they steal, act the way they act...even in your wildest dreams?
If your answer is NO!, then welcome to the conscious human race.
My point before you read this section of a Global watch report...there seems to be something to all this...they are really not like us, many have said it, we have observed it. Do they really represent mankind?, Human kind? Are the clintonians, bubuskies, obobo's, the uoons, the neverdidajobs, the sorasses and the rest of their ilk anything like us?
I think not.
"However it is critical to realize that the Global Domination Agenda is not dependent upon the creation of private bankers. It is in essence the belief of a families that sit hidden by the private bankers who have had their worldview institutionalized in man-made laws and kept in place by bribes and threats and presented by private banking oligarchs. It has become in some ways a “legal mafia” because violations of contract integrity, persons and property are supported by legislation. Just a few examples are: fraud and embezzlement (fiat money, swaps, short sales, derivatives, subsidies, bailouts, corporate personhood, etc.) theft (involuntary taxation, eminent domain land seizures), kidnapping (military draft, extraordinary rendition, Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act...), assault (mandatory vaccines, mandatory pesticide sprays, covert Chemtrails spraying, sobriety checkpoints...) torture (“enhanced interrogation techniques”)."
"This is the real true root of the axis of evil..................The global domination agenda."
"Over 400 years ago, the Florentine statesman Niccolo Machiavelli engaged in a profound
study of methods used by various rulers to attain power ... The findings of Machiavelli and
other students of power decree that to obtain power it is essential to ignore the moral laws
of man and of God; that promises must be made only with the intention to deceive and to
mislead others to sacrifice their own interests; that the most brutal atrocity must be
committed as a matter of mere convenience; that friends or allies must be betrayed as
matter of course as soon as they have served their purpose. But, it is also decreed that
these atrocities must be kept hidden from the common people except only where they are
of use to strike terror to the hearts of opponents; that there must be kept up a spurious
aspect of benevolence and benefit for the greater number of the people, and even an
aspect of humility to gain as much help as possible."
"People Who Believe They Are Genetically Different"
"When you hear terms, families of power, global elite, bloodlines of the illuminati, black nobility etc, it is likely that you are thinking of royalty, wealth, affluence and shadow government. However what many people do not realize is that the theological belief of the global elite, is one in which they believe they are genetically and spiritually different to the human race."
"If you study the history behind the evolution of these families and their networks of power, it becomes very apparent that they have a very deep disgust and contempt for the human race. This is borne out of the fact that they affiliate themselves with a belief that they are not fully human, and genetically different to the human race."
"It sounds bizarre to say the least, but once you understand this crucial point then everything starts to make sense in regards to why the architects of the new world order simply have no disregard for life. The human race is seen merely as cattle and the loss of life whether through major wars, genocide or manipulated acts of terror, are simply seen as the un-avoidable casualties of a war to drive through their bizarre agenda."
No need to buy the report, but if you should want to: http://www.globalwatchweekly.com/thed...
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
I too observe that IQ is not the end to end all...no matter how much compartmentalized information you have in your brain, what really matters that makes one really smart is the degree of integration of that information...integration is a sign that one has achieved and uses his mind.
It also may very well be that "genetics" has nothing to do with intelligence. What does, I don't know but I see no gene, chemical substance or the way one's body reads those genes that would determine how smart a person might be.
The more I study it, the more I see that there seems to be something else going on here.
In short: Once mankind had language, the next step in our evolution was the voice, but understood as the voice of the gods, rulers or their ancestors.
Mankind relied on that voice for a looooooong time, perhaps 190thousand years to have it go away...can you imagine that?...(just a teaser, see the other post). Things in the city states got really confusing and somehow the voice was abandon, if I remember, was Jaynes's take.
I don't go into a lot of detail in my Book, The Fight for Conscious Human Life, but I do detail how these evolutionary occurrences have effected our society and civilization....Warning, I did Rant a bit; something I won't be doing in my next book in progress.
There is a Julian Jaynes blog site but everyone there, just like here, has read the works of the author.
See: The breakdown of the bicameral mind, by Julian Jaynes.
A second book written by the founder of that blog in co-operation with many other psychologist finds Jaynes was right on and advance that understanding:, written by Marcel Knijsten Gods, Voices and the Bicameral Mind
1) What is the origination of these "voices"? This seems to me to be key to the entire theory. (Note that one can not accept an answer of internal fabrication here without the entire theory undermining itself.)
1b) What determines how (and when) these "voices" speak and to whom?
1c) Are the communications of these "voices" one-way or two-way?
2) What is the justification for the author to determine that these "voices" not only spoke, but drove actuation, i.e. what power of sustenance was provided by these "voices"? To put it another way, what value did these "voices" bring that would cause man to listen in the first place?
3) What is the author's proposed rationale for the cessation of the "voices", thus forcing man to rely on himself for survival? Please include time frame as "a long time" is vague and such a process must either be a genetically traceable process or an individual process - it can not be both.
4) Is this communication a genetically-inherited trait, i.e. if the parents stop listening, do the children inherit the same state of communication (or lack thereof) of their parents?
That is not to say that one in this position could not change...those without conscience have acted to confound those of us that do since the fall of Babylon right up to this moment.
Note: it took a long time and that process has not been initiated by all across the world. Perhaps, maybe 50% of the west but only 40% of the entire world as a whole to date. That's just an observational guess but it's pretty clear that we are not all on the same conscious page.
The brain alone, is an amazing thing and can, as witnessed through history, accomplish many things...except view itself and willfully modify it's behavior...for that takes a conscious mind.
Mere awareness is not consciousness without the ability to be aware of one's own awareness, inspect one's behavior and willingly modify that behavior beyond one's own survival needs.
It takes three things to make a Conscious Human Being: a health functioning brain, connected to, a mind and a body inwhich to reside. That mind, the ancients thought, was that "all seeing eye." (note here again...that all seeing eye was something outside of themselves).
Observations would be, muslim terrorist, or any other terrorist that would kill the innocent, the ancient Assyrians along with those you mention in #3, (to include governments as an entity also.)
2, Correct, she never mentioned them directly but spoke of the brain sets of these creatures.
3, Yes, missed it in my editing, (always after posting).
My labeling is scientifically and psychologically based,
The dreams of a NWO have never died and are the dreams of parasitical, non-conscious entities that have no mutuality with Humankind...hence, they think they are different and better than us...they certainly are different but certainly not better, Observably, they Are the Great Unwashed.
PS. I use the works of Julian Jaynes, The breakdown of the bicameral [brain], (he uses "mind" meaning the brain), history, biology and quantum physics in my work.
I also disagree with the notion that man was "pre-conscious" 3,000-5,000 years ago. As per my description above, they were self-aware and self-actualizing, they just adhered to a different moral code. I would also caution in referring too generally here, as anthropologists will no doubt point out that each society was very different than others (to the degree that such study is possible). There is also no direct observation of such, so any "studies" and theory must be taken with a large degree of supposition. Thus any kind of definitive conclusions are going to have a significant factor of error.
Regarding your point that many people in times past adhered to an external view of life (things are done to them rather than being in control), I look around and still see a lot of that - despite society's so-called advances! Given the systemic nature of this moral outlook on life, I muse that this attitude of blame is an endemic and natural state of man that requires focus and moral commitment to change. The morality of natural law (somewhat paradoxically) requires Man to abandon this "natural" inclination to seek only to be acted upon and thus find blame rather than taking action himself and finding opportunity. For all of man's technological advances, I remain skeptical that we have made similar advances (as a race of beings) in morality.
Morality of bicameral man, (behaving, being good) was the results of survival in a complex society but when bad things happened it was blamed on something outside one's self...ie, the "Gods" are angry...today, the bicamerals in government and those they have made in their own image have that same tendency to blame everything and everyone else on what they themselves have done; and yes, there are those that do it on purpose but that in itself shows a lack of conscience, morality and mankind's natural mutuality with others outside family units.
I think that you need to rethink what you are trying to describe. I will point only three instances that you should contemplate some more. The list could be much longer but I do not have the time for that.
I start with two premises, which I believe to be, by now, self-evident truth, i.e. like axioms.
Humans are the most advanced form of life, species, evolved on the planet Earth. They posses rational faculties, which gave them an advantage in competition for survival, reproduction and adaptation to the surroundings, compared to all other living organisms. The Reason.
Genetics showed that each human being is an unprecedented and an unrepeatable, unique individual within the human species.
Now the three instances to which I take exception.
1. "...humanoids that I have observed to possess no conscience, not conscious, no mind and brain in a body ..."
Please document scientifically at least one of your observations.
2. "... those that AR talked and wrote about, the central bankers, the kings and queens ..."
I have studied quite a bit of Ayn Rand's writings. I cannot recall any occasion where she wrote about kings and queens. Maybe I am too old (82) and my memory fails me. Can you give me a couple of quotes from her writings of kings and queens?
3. "... architects of the new world order simply have no disregard for life ..."
(I think you meant regard, not disregard. Right?)
From all the way back to Roman emperors, Chinese and Mongol emperors down to Stalin and Hitler, people who acquired extraordinary powers talked about "new man" and "new world order" and ended up unsuccessful in the so called "dust bin of history". It never happened and never will.
On the other hand there is an evolution of our knowledge and understanding of reality and existence. 400 years old Machiavellian understandings of power and governance seem to me a bit outdated in the 21st century.
One last comment. The quotes you provide are brimming with what I would call inflammatory labeling and ill defined concepts. Of course, it is not the first time I hear about nefarious plans prepared and hidden by the powerful to dominate the human race. Reality is more complicated, sophisticated and ultimately more stable, I think.
Stay well and happy.
Sincerely,
Maritimus
Whether morality can really be "unwilling" to me is an interesting position. Perhaps you can expound.
(PS - I've never seen bicameral used in this way. Please elaborate as to your intent.)
The biggest difference in moral behavior between bicameral man and conscious man was the adoption of morality willingly instead of by fear of consequences inflicted by unseen forces.
However I have noticed after 50 years of trying to teach the moral superiority of liberty there are very few who can grasp it. Most want the promise of something free stolen from someone else and will submit to almost anything, including wars and murdering enemies of the state, to produce as little as possible and demand the right to consume as much as they desire.
What really is at issue is the moral fundamentals adopted by these individuals, whether by choice or by instruction. Their moral compasses simply are not set to align north with individual rights. Can they discard these compasses and adopt others? Certainly. The question is will they do so willingly.
Load more comments...