Cuomo: 12-Year-Old Girl Should Be Exposed To Penis
Trump handed the decision to have PC unisex bathrooms for transgenders back to the states, but even that ain't good enough for spineless libtard governors and some mainstream media commentators.
Take CNN host Chris Cuomo--please!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Hqjj...
No, CNN thinks the pinhead is just fine where he is. Heard Rush Limbaugh talking about the daffy dude on the radio today.
Cuomo thinks that a 12-year-old girl should not be offended and surely not frightened by an exposed penis in a restroom. If she were, that means her intolerant daddy taught her to be a bigot.
Rush went on to say that, these, days, people are allowed to be news anchors who are insane.
Me dino wants to take such PC insanity a step further, Let us consider, by extension, the almost cliche scenario of a dirty old man in an overcoat exposing himself to a woman on the street. Does not this classic pervert have a classic pervert problem like a transgender has a transgender problem? .
I suppose the day will come when such a victimized woman on the street will be PC expected to clasp her hands together and proudly proclaim her tolerance of being so exposed.
Now let's go a step further. Maybe fathers need to learn to be tolerant of their 12-year-old girls running around naked in public.
Yeah, let's all prove our tolerance by having city sidewalks look like nudist colonies that whole weirdo families actually go to.
Take CNN host Chris Cuomo--please!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Hqjj...
No, CNN thinks the pinhead is just fine where he is. Heard Rush Limbaugh talking about the daffy dude on the radio today.
Cuomo thinks that a 12-year-old girl should not be offended and surely not frightened by an exposed penis in a restroom. If she were, that means her intolerant daddy taught her to be a bigot.
Rush went on to say that, these, days, people are allowed to be news anchors who are insane.
Me dino wants to take such PC insanity a step further, Let us consider, by extension, the almost cliche scenario of a dirty old man in an overcoat exposing himself to a woman on the street. Does not this classic pervert have a classic pervert problem like a transgender has a transgender problem? .
I suppose the day will come when such a victimized woman on the street will be PC expected to clasp her hands together and proudly proclaim her tolerance of being so exposed.
Now let's go a step further. Maybe fathers need to learn to be tolerant of their 12-year-old girls running around naked in public.
Yeah, let's all prove our tolerance by having city sidewalks look like nudist colonies that whole weirdo families actually go to.
Bingo! She resigned.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2...
It's far more PC to care so much more about .3%~that's point-three percent~of the population, who have a mental problem, that you give rapists a far better opportunity to get at your kids in a rest room.
And who says a make-believe transgender won't attack teen-aged and adult women either?
Providing revolving door sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants, who are repeatedly arrested for crimes and deported only to return, is pretty much the same kind of PC reckless with citizen lives lunacy.
Dems who condone such garbage are sick as hell in the head.
BTW, make believe transgenders can translate into fraternity boys having a field day in women's restrooms.
I was in a Best Buy with my son several months ago.
I told him I needed a rest room, placed a finger to my chin and said, "And do I identify with a woman today? Hm, hm, hm. Naw!"
Wonder why I never do feel that way.
For a POTUS to make such a big issue for saying I could, you'd think I'd want to..
The main reason why there are restrooms for women only is to protect them from perverts. You'd think that the feminists would want it to stay that way since most of them hate men.
They are lib ironic for being the fulla feelings stereotype irrational women they scorn.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAIMj...
The United States Justice and Education departments said Wednesday that public schools no longer need to follow Obama administration orders requiring that transgender students be allowed to use bathrooms and locker rooms of their chosen gender.
The Obama rules provoked a legal backlash in parts of the country, including a Virginia, Minn., lawsuit, with some arguing that children could be forced into an intimate setting with someone of the opposite sex.
Trump administration officials on Wednesday said those decisions should rest with state and local governments.
Dayton, however, criticized that move and urged Minnesota schools to adhere to the Obama-era regulations and protect transgender students. He noted that the most recent Minnesota student survey showed transgender students feel less safe in schools than other students.
I've Never seen one. If they are transgender, it's either a kick they are on and will get over it, they were egged on by others or their parents or have already been prayed upon by a perv!
Correction, at hospice last year, we had an ole hippy type, beard and all in a sun dress...no one here could hold in their laughter...the next day he came to visit his parent dressed normally.
This guy I have seen him maybe 4 times in the summer at the grocery store
6'2" heavy black 4 o'clock shadow dressed with a wig and heels and dress. His head was on a swivel looking for the involuntary reactions he would evoke.
Fricken weird.
A sheriff's deputy from another county dropped off an inmate and used the sally port officer's quarters to give another a rest room break before transporting that said inmate on elsewhere.
That said inmate was big, hairy, thickly bearded and wore a woman's yellow dress. It was a pretty light dress like the kind worn in the summertime.
Meanwhile, the sally port officer was struggling hard not to laugh.
The time in and out indicated that the bearded transvestite only needed to do a #1.
Wonder if he stood or sat. Hm. .
Other sites will give you a zero point slightly different something else but the percentage is so low I can't see how it warrants blowing tax money and putting little girls at risk. .
I selected this one due to a question anyone can reply to. The answer of should a president make transgender people a high priority is NO by 94%.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/24/exa...
I hope Dayton is voted out of office. The concept of impeachment now floats up into my dino mind.
Today I heard Rush Limbaugh praise Trump for following Federalist principles on the transgenders in school issue.
I think constitutional conservative Ted Cruz, who is all into states rights and who I voted for in the primary, would have done the same thing Trump did..
We have had big influxes of Somali and Muslim immigrants preasuring our social services all encouraged by Dayton. He was a terrible Senator and now a worse governor.
However, this is the tiniest, stupid, irrelevant lightning rod I've ever seen. Can we possibly be arguing about the rights of a smaller portion of society to potentially offend a larger portion of society than this? The issue should be left to the owners of the bathrooms. For public ones, states seem like the right place to leave it.
Otherwise, it's all his parents fault.
But of course the Left thinks this is normal behavior...probably cause they are ped's too!
---dinosaur plagiarism strikes!
The argument boils down to:
"a select group of people should be allowed to choose the genitalia of people in the bathroom they want to use". If a woman wants to use the men's room, she is wanting to choose pee around people with penises. If a man wants to use the women's room he is wanting to choose to pee around people with vaginas. What one "identifies" as is entirely irrelevant.
What is missing is that by forcing a "mensroom" to be open to non-men, you are removing the "choice" of men who don't want to be whipping it out in front of women, and for women to not pee around men. Thus, the argument is essentially "this tiny, tiny portion of the populace's feelings and desires should entirely overwhelm the feelings and desires of the rest of the population". The argument being made is that a woman who "identifies as a man" is somehow uncomfortable or "less" for having to pee around other people with vaginas, but also that men who don't want to pee around people with vaginas' discomfort is irrelevant - thus actually making them legally "less than".
That argument is clearly stupid. It isn't even really a "progressive argument" because that would really require the needs of the many to outweigh the needs of the few, which this argument inverts. To truly make the argument the left is making here, you must argue for a single large restroom with no stalls, no barriers, and no other limitations. But they aren't. They do not make this argument because it exposes, if you will, the stupidity and illogical nature of the argument.
Let's put it a vote! Tee-hee.
Obozo and Cuomo think kowtowing to the tender sensibilities of the .3% who amount to the transgender population is more important than common sense public safety.
Such a common sense public safety issue also extends to putting a halt to repeatedly deported illegal aliens who commit crimes and terrorists who sneak in with such people.
When the once O the great and powerful spoke of "That's not who we are," he must have been speaking of bleeding heart chumps who want to feel good about being bleeding heart chumps.
The Liar-In-Chief was not "we" including himself with chumps he wished to mislead. He was only interested in jacking up the Jackass Party voter count with an incoming deluge of foreigners.
Have you ever been in a women's restroom? We don't have urinals. We have individual stalls, with doors. Nobody's genitals are exposed to anybody. If a 12-year-old girl is seeing genitals in a women's restroom, it's because she's peeking in a door. If anyone is exposing their genitals in a women's restroom, that's a different issue and that would be a problem, but it's not transgender specific.
Then again, IMO, a wise person doesn't tie one's identity to which room they pee in.
This transgender nonsense renders a woman's restroom into a softer target for a pervert watching a door.
I know lots of people who were raped in all sorts of situations. Why don't we address that, instead of further stigmatizing a group of people that is largely unrelated to this issue?
However, according to sources for Wikipedia:
" It is estimated that about 0.005% to 0.014% of people assigned male at birth and 0.002% to 0.003% of people assigned female at birth would be diagnosed with gender dysphoria, based on 2013 diagnostic criteria"
This tells us some key bits of information. First it is less than the percentages touted. Second, there is a clear skew toward male to female dysphoria by roughly 2-3x.
A key aspect bot talked about in this flap is that there is a difference between actual legal transgendered (having GID and/or the surgery and hormone treatment to make you look like the other sex) and "identify as the opposite gender".
However, to actually enforce such a restriction would require some form of registration and identification. But really, that is only for those who have not been "re-assigned" as only those who are visibly not of the gender the restroom was intended for would be questioned or complained about. This would of course naturally be skewed toward men identifying as female and thus going into the ladies room.
But the federal order wasn't just about barrooms but locker rooms, showers, and "related areas". The media and pundits just like to focus on the waste elimination side and conveniently forget that it also applied to the rest of the "facilities".
And to the claim that someone will argue for urinals going into ladies rooms making no sense I'll also add this: http://nationalreport.net/arizona-bil...
Oh and here is a trans-women who objects to having to "hide" in the stall so wants to use urinals: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theg...
So yeah, the notion that no transwoman will want to use a urinal was proven false last year in a rather public fashion. Not to mention retractable urinals in ladies rooms in Europe is already a reality.
Never a peep from the media, either.
Regarding this Obama law on transgender school restrooms...Am I the only one noticing that they always start with the children?
At an event a couple months ago a kid threw a snowball and my 8-y/o's face. I don't think they knew I was watching. My kid told him that's not how we play. The other kids said, "but I got you. I got you!" My kid deadpanned back, "doesn't count when it's in the face." The kid tried to persist. My kid picked up a snowball and threw it at the other kid's thick coat and said, "now that counts." The other kid followed his lead and started playing nice. I was so proud.
I know when they get older they will surely not be offended or frightened by any part of the human anatomy, will never take perverse pleasure in making someone different feel uncomfortable, and will keep leading by example.