Cuomo: 12-Year-Old Girl Should Be Exposed To Penis

Posted by  $  allosaur 4 months ago to News
63 comments | Share | Flag

Trump handed the decision to have PC unisex bathrooms for transgenders back to the states, but even that ain't good enough for spineless libtard governors and some mainstream media commentators.
Take CNN host Chris Cuomo--please!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Hqjj...
No, CNN thinks the pinhead is just fine where he is. Heard Rush Limbaugh talking about the daffy dude on the radio today.
Cuomo thinks that a 12-year-old girl should not be offended and surely not frightened by an exposed penis in a restroom. If she were, that means her intolerant daddy taught her to be a bigot.
Rush went on to say that, these, days, people are allowed to be news anchors who are insane.
Me dino wants to take such PC insanity a step further, Let us consider, by extension, the almost cliche scenario of a dirty old man in an overcoat exposing himself to a woman on the street. Does not this classic pervert have a classic pervert problem like a transgender has a transgender problem? .
I suppose the day will come when such a victimized woman on the street will be PC expected to clasp her hands together and proudly proclaim her tolerance of being so exposed.
Now let's go a step further. Maybe fathers need to learn to be tolerant of their 12-year-old girls running around naked in public.
Yeah, let's all prove our tolerance by having city sidewalks look like nudist colonies that whole weirdo families actually go to.
SOURCE URL: http://www.libertyheadlines.com/cnn-12-yr-old-girl-exposed-penis/?AID=7236


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by  $  Dobrien 4 months ago
    Minnesota Gov Dayton on Thursday attacked a federal decision to pull back on rules intended to accommodate the needs of transgender children in schools.

    The United States Justice and Education departments said Wednesday that public schools no longer need to follow Obama administration orders requiring that transgender students be allowed to use bathrooms and locker rooms of their chosen gender.

    The Obama rules provoked a legal backlash in parts of the country, including a Virginia, Minn., lawsuit, with some arguing that children could be forced into an intimate setting with someone of the opposite sex.

    Trump administration officials on Wednesday said those decisions should rest with state and local governments.

    Dayton, however, criticized that move and urged Minnesota schools to adhere to the Obama-era regulations and protect transgender students. He noted that the most recent Minnesota student survey showed transgender students feel less safe in schools than other students.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  Olduglycarl 4 months ago
      How many of these kids could there possible be?..is there something in the water these days?, something I missed...thankfully!!!

      I've Never seen one. If they are transgender, it's either a kick they are on and will get over it, they were egged on by others or their parents or have already been prayed upon by a perv!

      Correction, at hospice last year, we had an ole hippy type, beard and all in a sun dress...no one here could hold in their laughter...the next day he came to visit his parent dressed normally.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  Dobrien 4 months ago
        They seem to like to shock the folks.
        This guy I have seen him maybe 4 times in the summer at the grocery store
        6'2" heavy black 4 o'clock shadow dressed with a wig and heels and dress. His head was on a swivel looking for the involuntary reactions he would evoke.
        Fricken weird.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by  $  4 months ago
          During the 90s I was working the back gate tower at the prison I retired from.
          A sheriff's deputy from another county dropped off an inmate and used the sally port officer's quarters to give another a rest room break before transporting that said inmate on elsewhere.
          That said inmate was big, hairy, thickly bearded and wore a woman's yellow dress. It was a pretty light dress like the kind worn in the summertime.
          Meanwhile, the sally port officer was struggling hard not to laugh.
          The time in and out indicated that the bearded transvestite only needed to do a #1.
          Wonder if he stood or sat. Hm. .
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  4 months ago
      Around .3% of the American population are transgender, which I personally view as a psychological problem.
      Other sites will give you a zero point slightly different something else but the percentage is so low I can't see how it warrants blowing tax money and putting little girls at risk. .
      I selected this one due to a question anyone can reply to. The answer of should a president make transgender people a high priority is NO by 94%.
      http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/24/exa...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by  $  Dobrien 4 months ago
        I so agree. It is just not an issue that a president should devote his time , unless bullying is involved and bullying is a serious problem. Social media and such enables anonymous bullying.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by  $  4 months ago
          Off and on, I've been thinking about what you wrote about Gov. Dayton and him evidently only worrying about how transgender students feel~despite the very few they must be in Minnesota or anywhere. That troubles me for the child endangerment inflicted on the vast majority of normal little girls in that state.
          I hope Dayton is voted out of office. The concept of impeachment now floats up into my dino mind.
          Today I heard Rush Limbaugh praise Trump for following Federalist principles on the transgenders in school issue.
          I think constitutional conservative Ted Cruz, who is all into states rights and who I voted for in the primary, would have done the same thing Trump did..
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by  $  Dobrien 4 months ago
            The heir to the target fortune with his family trust held in So. Dakota no state tax but funny that he promotes higher taxes on the evil wealthy In Minn.
            We have had big influxes of Somali and Muslim immigrants preasuring our social services all encouraged by Dayton. He was a terrible Senator and now a worse governor.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Thoritsu 4 months ago
    For the record, I don't care how many women-by-birth or guys wearing dresses come into the men's room. Have to hear what women say.

    However, this is the tiniest, stupid, irrelevant lightning rod I've ever seen. Can we possibly be arguing about the rights of a smaller portion of society to potentially offend a larger portion of society than this? The issue should be left to the owners of the bathrooms. For public ones, states seem like the right place to leave it.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 3 months, 4 weeks ago
    No comment. I actually wrote one but ended up deleting it. Who actually votes for these people like Cuomo, Pelosi, Reed, Waters, etc.? That's the real problem. We elect freaks and then they want to change things that have worked for centuries to some freaky way they think should conform to their individual strange beliefs. Hell, that's even how we got Trump, at least that's why I voted for him due to his desire to knock off the bull and get back to the Constitution and Law, and clean the swamp. Hopefully more states will soon follow suite. Whoops I guess I actually made a comment.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Eyecu2 3 months, 4 weeks ago
    I live in Texas. If they ever pass laws that allow men into the women's restroom. I will go into the restroom with my wife and daughter. Then lean against the stall door while they do their business. If they say anything to me, I will state that I identify as a protective man.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Riftsrunner 3 months, 4 weeks ago
    What I find telling is the progressives are acting like Obama's executive order had the force of law. And Trump cannot recinding it because it doesn't line up with their views (there were reports about lawsuits preventing Trump from recinding the order, but may have been talking points by some LGBTQXYZ group's plans). It was just a suggestion at best (though it did have an ultimatum that schools would lose funding if they didn't comply). And all Trump did was return the decision back to the States, saying it was not the Federal government's perogative, but the State's.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheRealBill 3 months, 4 weeks ago
    Let us examine the argument being made, and expose its stupidity.

    The argument boils down to:
    "a select group of people should be allowed to choose the genitalia of people in the bathroom they want to use". If a woman wants to use the men's room, she is wanting to choose pee around people with penises. If a man wants to use the women's room he is wanting to choose to pee around people with vaginas. What one "identifies" as is entirely irrelevant.

    What is missing is that by forcing a "mensroom" to be open to non-men, you are removing the "choice" of men who don't want to be whipping it out in front of women, and for women to not pee around men. Thus, the argument is essentially "this tiny, tiny portion of the populace's feelings and desires should entirely overwhelm the feelings and desires of the rest of the population". The argument being made is that a woman who "identifies as a man" is somehow uncomfortable or "less" for having to pee around other people with vaginas, but also that men who don't want to pee around people with vaginas' discomfort is irrelevant - thus actually making them legally "less than".

    That argument is clearly stupid. It isn't even really a "progressive argument" because that would really require the needs of the many to outweigh the needs of the few, which this argument inverts. To truly make the argument the left is making here, you must argue for a single large restroom with no stalls, no barriers, and no other limitations. But they aren't. They do not make this argument because it exposes, if you will, the stupidity and illogical nature of the argument.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wmiranda 4 months ago
    Allosaur, you are a much bigger gentleman than I am for calling Cuomo a pinhead. That or you're holding back some. I can't write in this forum my initial thoughts of Cuomo when I first saw his tweet about this issue.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  3 months, 4 weeks ago
      The only thing I am holding back is that I know a lady who as a child was raped in a women's restroom.
      Obozo and Cuomo think kowtowing to the tender sensibilities of the .3% who amount to the transgender population is more important than common sense public safety.
      Such a common sense public safety issue also extends to putting a halt to repeatedly deported illegal aliens who commit crimes and terrorists who sneak in with such people.
      When the once O the great and powerful spoke of "That's not who we are," he must have been speaking of bleeding heart chumps who want to feel good about being bleeding heart chumps.
      The Liar-In-Chief was not "we" including himself with chumps he wished to mislead. He was only interested in jacking up the Jackass Party voter count with an incoming deluge of foreigners.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by slfisher 4 months ago
    Oh, for goodness' sake. That's not what it means at all.

    Have you ever been in a women's restroom? We don't have urinals. We have individual stalls, with doors. Nobody's genitals are exposed to anybody. If a 12-year-old girl is seeing genitals in a women's restroom, it's because she's peeking in a door. If anyone is exposing their genitals in a women's restroom, that's a different issue and that would be a problem, but it's not transgender specific.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by TheRealBill 3 months, 4 weeks ago
      Right, currently y'all don't have urinals. Currently. It is not a stretch to project that if people-with-penises who "identify" as a women are "less" unless they are able to force others to let them pee in the ladies room, that you'll see urinals mandated because a man-as-woman would feel disempowered if "prevented" from standing to pee. After all, we already have women who stand to pee at a urinal.

      Then again, IMO, a wise person doesn't tie one's identity to which room they pee in.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by slfisher 3 months, 4 weeks ago
        I'm sorry, that doesn't make any sense at all. A transgender woman isn't going to want to stand to pee . Do you know any transgender women at all?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by TheRealBill 3 months, 4 weeks ago
          Actually yes. I have two that I know, one of which does prefer to stand due to convenience (it is quite convenient, so yes that makes sense as well). I also know men who prefer to sit to pee. Every demographic is not monolithic. This is the last place I'd expect to read someone act as if they are.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by  $  4 months ago
      I know a lady who as a child was raped in a woman's restroom.
      This transgender nonsense renders a woman's restroom into a softer target for a pervert watching a door.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Riftsrunner 3 months, 4 weeks ago
        And with the SJW'S claiming we live in a 'rape culture' it seems disingenuous to be for both of these issues. Especially since being trans is totally in the person's head and has no physical evidence to support it. So while I will accept that some people may believe they were born in the wrong sex, there is no way they can prove that this is not a phase they are just going through (being a trans-trender). And as such, people trying to commit criminal acts can just claim to be trans and get access to victims because there is not difference between an actual trans person and the pervert.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by slfisher 4 months ago
        Was she raped by someone pretending to be transgender?

        I know lots of people who were raped in all sorts of situations. Why don't we address that, instead of further stigmatizing a group of people that is largely unrelated to this issue?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by  $  3 months, 4 weeks ago
          I'm not stigmatizing anyone save for a dimwitted anchorman and a pinhead for a past president who rendered women's restrooms into a unisex visitation zone.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by mgarbizo1 3 months, 4 weeks ago
      slfisher, you're right using the bathroom is not transgender specific and therefore, there shouldn't be any laws to put it (transgender rights) above the rights of others. As I understand, liberals are advocating for transgender males to be able to use public female bathrooms at the expense of all females for whom the lady's bathroom was designed for (can we agree on this?). They want to protect the transgender's rights by allowing them the use of a public female bathroom (which is not a right in my opinion) at the expense of infringing on the female population for whom that public bathroom was made and designed for. The liberals are cleverly using children to sway public opinion, but they won't talk about grown men having this same right that they want for the transgender "children." Any logical mind would see that applying this rule into legislature and seeing it through to its ends would result in adult males claiming they are transgender (how do you legally define who is and who isn't transgender? answer: you can't, so its a freeforall) now using a public bathroom labeled for women and filled with young girls all while that male having different intentions because it was their right to enter said bathroom as provided by the liberals. Clearly the liberal left are not thinking about the lawsuits that would unfold from this course of action, not surprised though. Common sense to me means that a transgender boy goes to the bathroom the same way that a regular boy does (public or private), so he should use the facilities that were designed for him.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by TheRealBill 3 months, 4 weeks ago
        Yes and no. Historically in order to be "qualified" for the cosmetic transgender surgery you had to be diagnosed with gender identity disorder. This is a psycho-physiological syndrome called Gender Dysphoria and was clinically quantified.

        However, according to sources for Wikipedia:
        " It is estimated that about 0.005% to 0.014% of people assigned male at birth and 0.002% to 0.003% of people assigned female at birth would be diagnosed with gender dysphoria, based on 2013 diagnostic criteria"

        This tells us some key bits of information. First it is less than the percentages touted. Second, there is a clear skew toward male to female dysphoria by roughly 2-3x.

        A key aspect bot talked about in this flap is that there is a difference between actual legal transgendered (having GID and/or the surgery and hormone treatment to make you look like the other sex) and "identify as the opposite gender".

        However, to actually enforce such a restriction would require some form of registration and identification. But really, that is only for those who have not been "re-assigned" as only those who are visibly not of the gender the restroom was intended for would be questioned or complained about. This would of course naturally be skewed toward men identifying as female and thus going into the ladies room.

        But the federal order wasn't just about barrooms but locker rooms, showers, and "related areas". The media and pundits just like to focus on the waste elimination side and conveniently forget that it also applied to the rest of the "facilities".

        And to the claim that someone will argue for urinals going into ladies rooms making no sense I'll also add this: http://nationalreport.net/arizona-bil...

        Oh and here is a trans-women who objects to having to "hide" in the stall so wants to use urinals: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theg...

        So yeah, the notion that no transwoman will want to use a urinal was proven false last year in a rather public fashion. Not to mention retractable urinals in ladies rooms in Europe is already a reality.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by fosterj717 4 months ago
    This proves that liberalism is a sickness and in the case of the Cuomos, it is also genetic! It also seems to get worse for each successive generation. Chris Cuomo now owns the dubious distinction of being totally out of his mind! I wonder how he would "allow" his 10 year old daughter to be exposed to this sick and deranged action!!! Chris, wake up and smell the coffee.....
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 4 months ago
    This makes me so grateful that my son and daughter don't have to grow up around this type of fear, bigotry, and name-calling.

    At an event a couple months ago a kid threw a snowball and my 8-y/o's face. I don't think they knew I was watching. My kid told him that's not how we play. The other kids said, "but I got you. I got you!" My kid deadpanned back, "doesn't count when it's in the face." The kid tried to persist. My kid picked up a snowball and threw it at the other kid's thick coat and said, "now that counts." The other kid followed his lead and started playing nice. I was so proud.

    I know when they get older they will surely not be offended or frightened by any part of the human anatomy, will never take perverse pleasure in making someone different feel uncomfortable, and will keep leading by example.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Abaco 4 months ago
    The elite left are rife with pedophiles. These are some really sick puppies. They've been passing and proposing laws in California to allow greater access to children for pedos for some time now.
    Never a peep from the media, either.

    Regarding this Obama law on transgender school restrooms...Am I the only one noticing that they always start with the children?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo