From the losers including libretards and RINO Dem Statists , first FBI is good see: Comey says no prosecutor would prosecute The gorgon hag. Next FBI bad : investigation reopened
Due to (well basically Wieners pedophilic actions the Husband to Huma ,a staged marriage) emails found on Huma Wieners laptop. Now FBI good : FBI agree's Russians interfered with election.
I will repeat from a former CIA Director Wm. Casey
"We will know our disinformation program is working when everything the American people think is false"
Is The CIA is on our side? They are on their own side . Some very bad folks to be sure. Clinton losing and the leaked emails exposing to citizens that are conscious, the nefarious behavior of the controlling Statists needs disinformation to fool us.

Those who dislike a trump presidency have nothing else to rant about so get used to hearing for probably the next 6 months.

In a few more weeks, the fake news will be that Russian hackers hacked weather patterns to send cold weather from the Arctic. For crying out loud, it will be January folks!

The funny thing about all this issue is that they're going crazy about the leak but no discussion about the substance of the charges. I guess if negative information is uncovered by an underhanded method the negative information has no value then huh?! Personally I don't really care where the information came from, the fact that the Democrats haven't denied it means it was all true.
All this discussion about the Russian hacking sounds very much like ..."just ignore the man behind the curtain"

Does anyone think the election was effected by these hacks? Fans of the Democrats want to say so, but i followed the election and Trump was taking the worst hits in the run-up. The news before the election was NOT "Hillary loses ground due to leaks.

It is, of course, possible that both explanations are simultaneously true. That the Russians were attempting to hack into targets of opportunity and were detected breaching the DNC servers and at least making an attempt at the RNC servers.

It's also possible that WikiLeaks got it's data from an insider in the DNC who was unhappy about how Bernie Sanders was treated and not a hack. Just because the Russians may have been detected trying to breach the servers does not mean that they provided the data to WikiLeaks.

I think the "progressives" are correct that a foreign power caused them to lose the election. Remember, they consider Middle America to be a foreign power. :-)

This is the fourth article I've read that reminds us that it was a leak and not a hack. (link at the bottom)

Whether it was or not, I remind everyone, that NO ONE has disputed the information revealed!
Seems obvious the demo's are just pissed they got caught at the hands of one of their own.

90+% of the country, (land mass, not population) voted for trumpet...there is no way any "Hack" could do that directly. In fact, just in, Chicago recount shows more votes for hiltery than voting tolls say possible...and to be fair and honest...a few recounts are under what vote counters reported. All the other recounts or vote investigations report No Hacking.

And another thing...The demo's Have tried to influence the voting in other countries, most recently in Israel...in my mind...they have no right to bitch or complain.

http://www.libertyheadlines.com/nsa-w...

Wikileaks said it wasn't the Russians.
With that in mind, me dino now adds that Rush Limbaugh had an interesting theory about who the hackers are as I drove to a deli to buy my catfish lunch as I usually do on Fridays.
Rush said it may take years to prove out but it could be some Bolshevik Bernie supporters, who are very ticked off over the $hillary fix that was unfairly arranged by the Jackass Party.

The Dems need to coverup the act that their candidate (Hillaary R. Clinton) was the worst candidate in recent history. They want to hide the fact that the (the establishment Dems) had tostack the deck against Bernie to prevent him from winning the nomination and only kept him out by the use of the Super Delagate ploy.
On top of that they need to hide the fact that Clinton lost 31 states including 3 that had not gone Republican in over 30 years.
They way to obscure all of that is to claim that a Foreign power interfered with the election by having a third party disclose damaging information about there candidate at the last moment. For get the fact that Dir. Comey laid out a perfect case for indictment and trail of Hillary in his statement that the FBI would not request a Grand Jury or indictment of her.
It is all the Russians fault. It not the fault of a candidate who lost a bigger percentage of the Dem "base" and any Dems since Humphry ran against Nixon.