Wikileaks said it wasn't the Russians.
With that in mind, me dino now adds that Rush Limbaugh had an interesting theory about who the hackers are as I drove to a deli to buy my catfish lunch as I usually do on Fridays.
Rush said it may take years to prove out but it could be some Bolshevik Bernie supporters, who are very ticked off over the $hillary fix that was unfairly arranged by the Jackass Party.

The media did FAR worse in leaning the election towards Hillary than any "hacking" done by other countries.

I have no issue with believing Russia and China got into emails from our government people. The democrats didnt have very secure systems and they were more vulnerable.

I can also believe that the real reason for russia getting the information is the same reason anyone spies on other people- they want to know what the other person or country is up to.

Hillary and Obama shouldnt complain that someone leaked information that they wanted to keep hidden. I think ALL information that people are trying to hide because they are afraid others wont like them SHOULD be made public.

Snowden and Assange are heroes, not criminals and should be freed of prosecution. Hillary did FAR more damage with her cronyism than either of those people did.

Just saw a poster that made me laugh:

Picture of Putin, saying "Did we hack your server? You mean, like with an axe?"

The Dems need to coverup the act that their candidate (Hillaary R. Clinton) was the worst candidate in recent history. They want to hide the fact that the (the establishment Dems) had tostack the deck against Bernie to prevent him from winning the nomination and only kept him out by the use of the Super Delagate ploy.
On top of that they need to hide the fact that Clinton lost 31 states including 3 that had not gone Republican in over 30 years.
They way to obscure all of that is to claim that a Foreign power interfered with the election by having a third party disclose damaging information about there candidate at the last moment. For get the fact that Dir. Comey laid out a perfect case for indictment and trail of Hillary in his statement that the FBI would not request a Grand Jury or indictment of her.
It is all the Russians fault. It not the fault of a candidate who lost a bigger percentage of the Dem "base" and any Dems since Humphry ran against Nixon.

Let's look at the facts Mam, just the facts. Only leaks by Wikileaks related to Democrat campaign and their candidate, none on Trump's campaign. Wikileaks says leaks didn't originate from Russia but from a leak here. A few weeks ago 27 year old DNC data analyst Seth Rich shot multiple times, including once in the back, on the streets of D,C, in what D.C. police called a botched robbery even though the "robber" took nothing from Rich except his life. Immediately after, Wikileaks offers an unprecedented reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of Rich's murderer. Think it's all a coincidence that a young Democrat staffer with access to the DNC's data files is assassinated about the time all the DNC's dirty laundry is leaked?

The best way to end a story is just to agree with it. Yes, Putin probably has everything in the US hacked, so what? Our government does the same, so what? If you don't want it hacked don't put it on the internet, and especially don't put it on Hillary's personal server. Anyone that would do that is just too ignorant. Trump and the honest media should only state the fact, "Who allowed it to be hacked?" Would you want them to have access to everything?

This seems to be some sort of ritual or rite of passage. Every new administration going back more than 20 years has started out with some sort of kerfuffle over Russia. Russia is like a movie set. All façade with nothing behind it. Getting verbally tough with them, unlike the last administration, will quiet them down, then backing it up with some sort of display if they don't behave will keep them in line. Show weakness, however, and like a hole in a boat, they'll gush right in.

Ok...here is another I just read moments ago...but still one word against another...unless someone confesses to the leak...there is no way we can prove one way or the other.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...

I would not advise the leaker to come out...stay in the closet, in the shadows or hiltery will get you.

There are absolutely no facts to even suggest that the Russians had anything to do with the leaks. At this point, Assange has proven that he is much more trustworthy than the CIA, and he is very clear that the Russians were not the source. All logic points that it would make no sense for the Russians to help elect Trump. I wouldn't even entertain this totally fabricated claim. But I would ask the libtards what exactly is their objection to publicizing criminal activity associated with the most transparent administration ever?

Those who dislike a trump presidency have nothing else to rant about so get used to hearing for probably the next 6 months.

In a few more weeks, the fake news will be that Russian hackers hacked weather patterns to send cold weather from the Arctic. For crying out loud, it will be January folks!

The funny thing about all this issue is that they're going crazy about the leak but no discussion about the substance of the charges. I guess if negative information is uncovered by an underhanded method the negative information has no value then huh?! Personally I don't really care where the information came from, the fact that the Democrats haven't denied it means it was all true.
All this discussion about the Russian hacking sounds very much like ..."just ignore the man behind the curtain"

Does anyone think the election was effected by these hacks? Fans of the Democrats want to say so, but i followed the election and Trump was taking the worst hits in the run-up. The news before the election was NOT "Hillary loses ground due to leaks.

It is, of course, possible that both explanations are simultaneously true. That the Russians were attempting to hack into targets of opportunity and were detected breaching the DNC servers and at least making an attempt at the RNC servers.

It's also possible that WikiLeaks got it's data from an insider in the DNC who was unhappy about how Bernie Sanders was treated and not a hack. Just because the Russians may have been detected trying to breach the servers does not mean that they provided the data to WikiLeaks.

This is the fourth article I've read that reminds us that it was a leak and not a hack. (link at the bottom)

Whether it was or not, I remind everyone, that NO ONE has disputed the information revealed!
Seems obvious the demo's are just pissed they got caught at the hands of one of their own.

90+% of the country, (land mass, not population) voted for trumpet...there is no way any "Hack" could do that directly. In fact, just in, Chicago recount shows more votes for hiltery than voting tolls say possible...and to be fair and honest...a few recounts are under what vote counters reported. All the other recounts or vote investigations report No Hacking.

And another thing...The demo's Have tried to influence the voting in other countries, most recently in Israel...in my mind...they have no right to bitch or complain.

http://www.libertyheadlines.com/nsa-w...

Hello Abaco.
The hacking is a potential problem. An investigation into it should be done as well as hardening of our cyber defenses. That said: I too am tired of the politicization of this story and the conflating of the hacking with the election results. The progressives and the MSM want to conflate the two for political advantage and use it as a smokescreen and diversion. The real story is the democrats' inability to address or refute the substance of the leaks. In truth, the public should be grateful the information was released before the election so an informed vote could be cast. Yes we should be grateful; if it had an effect on the election it may be that we dodged a bullet.
Respectfully,
O.A.

It's the Dem equivalent of "the dog ate my homework."

I'm sick of same, Abaco. I see lots of passionate finger pointing and even read a joint statement of spooks saying they are "confident" the Russians did it. Well, IMHO, passion and confidence aren't evidence. I say it's time to put up or shut up.

And I'm tired of hearing about Hillary's damn emails :-)

I'm sure the Dems were tired of hearing about Benghazi but the truth was theirs to own.

When did America's intelligence agencies become incompetent fools again? Or was that political lap dogs, I forget.

The real story was buried a long time ago. The real story being that the hack showed the DNC colluded with the Clinton campaign against Sanders. Also some of the damning Podesta emails were ignored.