11

Pets in Rand's Novels

Posted by $ SarahMontalbano 7 years, 5 months ago to Philosophy
38 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

This has been an idle thought that has been resurfacing in my mind for the last few days, and please excuse my errors. I'll learn.

Why are Rand's novels conspicuously devoid of animals/pets? The only instance I remember is Gail Wynard's kitten in Atlas Shrugged, which was mentioned only once, and fleetingly at that.
Was Rand making a philosophical point about animals? She may not have viewed them as worthwhile because they aren't intellectually stimulating for the heroes. Was it a personal preference? I haven't done any research, but maybe she just didn't like animals.
I've been writing an essay for the Fountainhead essay contest, and I wrote: "[Authors] must be selective in picking events that are ideologically significant to their theme." I personally believe that if one of the heroes had a pet, it would be insignificant to the idea of independence and rationality Rand was trying to create.
Or, to think of it differently, what was significant about Wynard's kitten that made it worth mentioning?

So, what say you?


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • 10
    Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago
    Ayn Rand had pet cats. Pets are inessential for the plots in the novels.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 7 years, 5 months ago
      Thanks for the clarification. That was my guess too.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago
        There is a lot to read about her principles of what to include in a novel in her The Romantic Manifesto and The Art of Fiction.

        But there are metaphorical references to cats in The Fountainhead:

        "Roark was there, on a davenport in the corner, half lying, sprawled limply like a kitten. It had often astonished Keating; he had seen Roark moving with the soundless tension, the control, the precision of a cat; he had seen him relaxed, like a cat, in shapeless ease, as if his body held no single solid bone."

        And:

        "At the dinner table Keating did most of the talking. He seemed possessed by a talking jag. He turned over words with the sensuous abandon of a cat rolling in catnip."

        And:

        "And then I [Wynand] looked at that kitten. And I thought that it didn't know the things I loathed, it could never know. It was clean—clean in the absolute sense, because it had no capacity to conceive of the world's ugliness. I can't tell you what relief there was in trying to imagine the state of consciousness inside that little brain, trying to share it, a living consciousness, but clean and free. I would lie down on the floor and put my face on that cat's belly, and hear the beast purring. And then I would feel better.... There, Howard. I've called your office a rotting wharf and yourself an alley cat."

        And:

        "She [Dominique] thought: This is the tribute to Gail, the confidence of surrender—he relaxes like a cat—and cats don't relax except with people they like."

        And:

        "They were walking past a vacant lot. The wind blew an old sheet of newspaper against her [Dominique's] legs. It clung to her with a tight insistence that seemed conscious, like the peremptory caress of a cat. She thought, anything of this town had that intimate right to her. She bent, picked up the paper and began folding it, to keep it."

        And this one, if you really want to stretch it:

        "Next morning, he walked into the office of the editor of the Gazette, a fourth-rate newspaper in a run-down building, and asked for a job in the city room. The editor looked at his clothes and inquired, 'Can you spell cat?'

        "'Can you spell anthropomorphology?' asked Wynand.

        "'We have no jobs here,' said the editor."


        There are many references to 'cats' in the index of Scott McConnell's, An Oral History of Ayn Rand on interviews with people who knew her. There is a photo of Ayn Rand with one of her cats in the Sures' Facets of Ayn Rand: Memoirs by Mary Ann Sures and Charles Sures, p. 126.

        There are also some references to cats in Michael Berliner's The Letters of Ayn Rand, including this endorsement of cats in 1966 to the editor of Cat Fancy magazine:

        "You ask whether I own cats or simply enjoy them, or both. The answer is: both. I love cats in general and own two in particular.

        "You ask: 'We are assuming that you have an interest in cats, or was your subscription strictly objective?' My subscription was strictly objective, because I have an interest in cats. I can demonstrate objectively that cats are a great value, and the charter issue of Cat Fanc magazine can serve as part of the evidence. ('Objective' does not mean 'disinterested' or indifferent; it means corresponding to the facts of reality and applies both to knowledge and to values.)

        "I subscribed to Cat Fancy primarily for the sake of the pictures, and found the charter issue very interesting and enjoyable."
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 7 years, 5 months ago
          Fantastic research. I was referring to concrete examples in my question but the metaphorical references to cats slipped my mind, or perhaps didn't seem important at the time. A lesson to always look at the details in the context of the larger picture. Thank you!
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ jbrenner 7 years, 5 months ago
          Thanks for the history, ewv. I am not surprised that Rand lived with (as opposed to owned or possessed) a cat. Dogs, being natural herders (i.e. enforcers) would have been inconsistent with her philosophy.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by ewv 7 years, 5 months ago
            Having a dog is not inconsistent with Ayn Rand's philosophy.

            Dogs' predecessors were pack animals. So were humans'. Many humans still are. There are no dog democratic socialists following Bernie Sanders. How a dog turns out depends on the characteristics of the breed, the immediate parentage, and how you work with it from the beginning of its development.

            Only a few breeds of dogs excel at herding, which is one kind of productive work, not enforcing. Intelligent dogs, including those originally bred for herding, have a natural inclination to be active in thinking and goal seeking, though they don't think in concepts.

            Common advice for owners of border collies is to make sure the dog has something to do or it will find something which you probably won't like. Some people don't want to have a border collie as a pet because they don't want a pet smarter than they are. Border collies are not only actively intelligent, taking in everything around them with amazing focus, they can be loving pets and individual companions who interact with their owners better than a lot of people do.

            An interesting account of the accomplishments of one border collie and her psychologist owner who worked with her is Chaser: Unlocking the Genius of the Dog Who Knows a Thousand Words https://www.amazon.com/Chaser-Unlocki...

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi8HF...

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTTui...

            http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-smart...

            https://www.youtube.com/user/pilleyjw
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by roneida 7 years, 5 months ago
            unless she needed some being to protect her or save her life. dogs are natural guardians of the people the y "love", that's why their name spelled backwards is quite powerful...believe it or not. Fido Fan.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 7 years, 5 months ago
    As ewv demonstrated, pets were not essential to the plots, but did, in fact, exist as elements of the narrative.

    The weather could be another example. The stories would have been essentially the same with no references to the weather. In fact, Rand used weather as an element in narrative. Bright clear days set the mood for good events. Probably the best example of bad weather was the day in Wyoming when Dagny was dismantling the John Galt Line and it was not cloudy enough to rain, but not clear enough to be sunny. "Board of directors weather" she called it.

    On the subject of pets, Nathaniel Branden wrote about the need for self-reflection. It is why we have (human) friends. Pets - even plants - allow us to perceive ourselves.

    We have had some recent movies about human explorers on Mars. Imagine being on a totally barren world where you had food, water, etc., but no other living things in your environment. In the movie Castaway Chuck Noland (played by Tom Hanks) anthropomorphizes a volley ball, giving it a face, and calling it "Wilson." We need reflection to perceive ourselves. It is as essential as air, water, and food. Pets serve that purpose.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 5 months ago
    I never thought about it. In most novels I have read, pets play no part at all. There are a few that I've come across over the years but these old brain cells are misconnecting in the memory department. One notable pet could be found in the "Thin Man" series that featured their pet dog "Asta."

    Ms. Rand struggled with writing Atlas in order to put forth her philosophy and still come up with a captivating story. It was written in the style of early 20th century Russian novels with a huge cast and many interwoven plots. She made revision after revision, often laboring for days at a time to put forth a concept so that it made its point and still fit into the plot. Not much room for pets.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 7 years, 5 months ago
    Elswhere, Ayn Rand made the remark that she did
    love cats. Also, there is a cat mentioned in We, the Living. But I am thinking that in cases of peop-
    le's struggling a lot (as some of her heroes did), per-
    haps they just didn't think they could afford pets. I think perhaps she regarded it as a marginal is-
    sue. She did mention somewhere, I think it was
    in an off-the-cuff answer, that animals, being
    living creatures, did have a "certain value", in-
    cluding as "surrogate friends".
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 7 years, 5 months ago
    Interesting. I've only read AS. I understand that it is like most/all of her work in that there's little mention of children. She didn't have any so I'm not too surprised. Ironically...the values I clung to in my challenges raising children have only cemented my position in Objectivism.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo