Gregg Jarrett: Why is the legal standard for Hillary different than the one for you and me?

Posted by mminnick 7 years, 6 months ago to News
35 comments | Share | Flag

The take away from this article: Deny, deny, deny and then deny more. and when you get through denying, say "I didn't know it was classified" until you've convinced yourself it is really true.
SOURCE URL: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/10/21/gregg-jarrett-why-is-legal-standard-for-hillary-different-than-one-for-and-me.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by ProfChuck 7 years, 6 months ago
    It's all about "Pull". "When you've got it you've got it." The "intellectual" aristocracy personified by the Clinton's is the hallmark of the liberal-progressive movement. Honesty in government is a quaint notion because corruption works better and appeals to scoundrels. That is why there are so many scoundrels in government, they find a friendly home there.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 7 years, 6 months ago
    The legal standard isn't different for Hillary. What's different is that we allow them to treat her differently. We no longer have a respect in this country for our laws. It used to be "obey the law or cause the law to be changed". Change is coming, but it's not the laws that are changing, it's the acceptance of criminal behavior by the elite and other minorities. The big problem is that half the population accepts this and the other half is unwilling to do much about it. Personally I see it as treason against the country. This is not supposed to be happening in this nation. Perhaps it's part of our transition to some other form of government leadership, like Iran's or North Korea's. It will come out to whatever we vote for, or rather whatever the outcome of the election dictates.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 6 months ago
    The standards are always different for the people "in power". They live better, get goodies from people they shower with governmental favors. Its an old boys club. Time for a change. Thats why I voted for Trump yesterday.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 7 years, 6 months ago
    she is an insider who helps the rest of the looters to loot even more. get the picture.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 7 years, 6 months ago
      Funny that only the supporters who give large amounts of money actually get anything in return. The so called 'little people" get promises and no action- even though they think that "stronger together" means THEY will get goodies.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 7 years, 6 months ago
    We have a new aristocracy in this country, and they're heady and drunk with power. The level of arrogance and condescension is such that they feel no shame nor need to hide their corruption. If past history is any gauge, they will either have to take a deep breath and try to become more responsible, or the pitchforks and torches will be the first indication that the natives have had enough.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 6 months ago
    Why is the legal standard different for Hilary? Simple. She has both the Justice Department and The FBI in her pocket. Why? We can only imagine. But one more thing to contemplate is that the heads of those divisions are complicit in her crime(s). If Trump does nothing more than "drain the swamp" of these criminals in Washington, then he's worth voting for.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 6 months ago
    Because those in power have decided that money is more important than integrity. It is a cartel - plain and simple. They are in it for money and don't care what they do to get it.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimslag 7 years, 6 months ago
    I am not a Federal Prosecutor, but if I was, Hillary and the Clinton Foundation would have a big, red bulls eye on them. I saw first hand how things worked as I had the sad misfortune of being stationed in Dirty City during the reign of Bill, Hillary and their minions. Having to deal with them on a at least weekly, if not daily routine, I had to give security training and scope of operations to habitants of the White House, personnel at the Pentagon and many other facilities that had access to secure communications. I have nothing but distain for the Clinton mafia and still think they had a hand in more than a few murders in Mordor (Vince Foster) and backwater Arkansas after the White Water scandal.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by MinorLiberator 7 years, 6 months ago
    While Hillary (and Bill) are by far the prime example, power does have a lot to do with it for many others getting away with things we "little people" can't. And now combine power with politics, which it of course always was, but increasingly with a certain persuasion of politics.

    I'd say beginning will the rise of Progressive Liberalism, power was supplemented by whether you followed the "right" worldview. The more you are in good standing with the Left, the more will be overlooked. which in turn has been further supplemented by the shift of the modern press and "journalism", with few exceptions, to following the the Left's agenda and "advancing The Narrative", rather than that old-fashion objective search for the Truth. Hence, again with thankfully ever-growing exceptions, people in the category of the Clintons are simply not going to be seriously investigated by the MSM. And given the fact that, unfortunately, the majority of Americans still get their news from the MSM, and therefore it's effectively that no investigation is done. (Fortunately, that is changing in the right direction, too.)

    I think a great example (although some may disagree) is Nixon. Hard to say he was not "powerful" by any definition. He was POTUS for God's sake. And he had a lot of very powerful friends. But I felt at the time, in my early 20's, having read Rand and "seen the light", that if the exact same actions, including the cover-up, committed during Watergate, had the been committed by a POTUS with a "D" after his name, there would have been no Woodward/Bernstein, no Pulitzer, no "All the Presidents Men". If it made the MSM at all, it would have been a "ho-hum, everybody does it" story, even in 1972.

    Finally, as a final thought on power, I also believe that ideology may be more of a factor than power now in terms of who gets away with what. Being from Detroit, and also an Economist, I paid a lot of attention to it's years of immense prosperity that I am old enough to remember, to watching to tortuous 40 year decline to bankruptcy. Yes, the Democrats destroyed it, and of course they had some power, but nothing in comparison to the Clinton's and their like in DC. But what the crooks did have was the right ideology, party backing, and I'll say: race, to get by with graft and corruption that "you and me" would never have gotten a pass on.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 7 years, 6 months ago
    It's different for the same reason the standard of sexual behavior is different for Mr. Trump. She's got enough money and power to corrupt anyone she wants to buy, and there are very few in Washington who aren't for sale.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 6 months ago
    "Why Charge Martin, But Not Clinton?
    In a phrase, it’s a mystery."
    No, there is no mystery.
    Comey is a Galt Damned Traitor.
    Clinton is a Galt Damned Traitor.
    Give them both the needle.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 6 months ago
      Not sure I would give them the needle. I think they should made to actually serve the people they have screwed over all these years.
      They should be paid minimum wage and made to work in the "Dirty Jobs" type positions so they can really understand what it is like to have to work with their hands and not with other peoples brains and money. Once they understand and realize the error of their ways (if ever), then ala "1984" give them the needle.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by term2 7 years, 6 months ago
        I have decided that all the people who vote Hillary this time are to be eliminated from my "circle of trust" and will no longer be considered friends. Voting for Hillary pretty much says it all when it comes to their characters
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 6 months ago
          Me dino once respected Glenn Beck, especially when he exposed all the activities of George Soros even though it cost him his afternoon TV show on Fox.
          Was noticing him unravel since then.
          But to endorse Shillary?
          Believe that ties in with what Michael Savage saying about liberalism being a mental disorder.
          I have no use Glenn Beck has to say about anything ever again. Same goes for anyone who votes for the evil hag.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by term2 7 years, 6 months ago
            I have unfriended anyone who votes for Hillary !! Life is too short to waste on people who dont respect me. Having voted for Hillary is a GREAT indication of that.
            I have noticed that FOX has switched to giving Hillary preferential treatment since the last debate. Someone high up was bought off I think and they are trying to be "balanced", whatever that means.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ pixelate 7 years, 6 months ago
              Thus far, I have tried to keep away from politics in terms of Facebook (friends, etc)... in particular, as it applies to my immediate neighbors. I am capitalist-libertarian-conservative ... whereas they are hard-left libs... John is on SDI and Mary teaches underprivileged kids at a govt. school. He tends to keep quiet on politics - knowing that we're on opposite ends of the "freedom spectrum" (plus the fact that he enjoys walking his dogs up on my acreage). She buys the entire Lib platform as religious orthodoxy. It is frustrating. By and large, we have so much in common ... but one of us votes for individual liberty and the others vote for the power of the state. Whenever there is a proposed tax increase, Mary will say "The state really needs that money." There is apparently no thought that the individual who earned the money need it (um, that's why they got jobs and / or started businesses!)

              A good number of my running friends are serious libs and progressives -- and they are quite vocal (in social media) about it. So far, I have had no rebuttal or comments on their posts ... go along to get along. But my patience is getting thin. I suppose that I'm just venting a bit on this here in The Gulch . . .
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by term2 7 years, 6 months ago
                I think it's time to accept that it's a war and not waste time with people who don't respect you. It's easy now- if they vote for Hillary they are not your friend
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by BeenThere 7 years, 6 months ago
              "I have noticed that FOX has switched to giving Hillary preferential treatment since the last debate. Someone high up was bought off I think and they are trying to be "balanced", whatever that means."

              Have also noticed that............am running it through the gristmill of my mind. BT
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo