Gregg Jarrett: Why is the legal standard for Hillary different than the one for you and me?
The take away from this article: Deny, deny, deny and then deny more. and when you get through denying, say "I didn't know it was classified" until you've convinced yourself it is really true.
I'd say beginning will the rise of Progressive Liberalism, power was supplemented by whether you followed the "right" worldview. The more you are in good standing with the Left, the more will be overlooked. which in turn has been further supplemented by the shift of the modern press and "journalism", with few exceptions, to following the the Left's agenda and "advancing The Narrative", rather than that old-fashion objective search for the Truth. Hence, again with thankfully ever-growing exceptions, people in the category of the Clintons are simply not going to be seriously investigated by the MSM. And given the fact that, unfortunately, the majority of Americans still get their news from the MSM, and therefore it's effectively that no investigation is done. (Fortunately, that is changing in the right direction, too.)
I think a great example (although some may disagree) is Nixon. Hard to say he was not "powerful" by any definition. He was POTUS for God's sake. And he had a lot of very powerful friends. But I felt at the time, in my early 20's, having read Rand and "seen the light", that if the exact same actions, including the cover-up, committed during Watergate, had the been committed by a POTUS with a "D" after his name, there would have been no Woodward/Bernstein, no Pulitzer, no "All the Presidents Men". If it made the MSM at all, it would have been a "ho-hum, everybody does it" story, even in 1972.
Finally, as a final thought on power, I also believe that ideology may be more of a factor than power now in terms of who gets away with what. Being from Detroit, and also an Economist, I paid a lot of attention to it's years of immense prosperity that I am old enough to remember, to watching to tortuous 40 year decline to bankruptcy. Yes, the Democrats destroyed it, and of course they had some power, but nothing in comparison to the Clinton's and their like in DC. But what the crooks did have was the right ideology, party backing, and I'll say: race, to get by with graft and corruption that "you and me" would never have gotten a pass on.
Have also noticed that............am running it through the gristmill of my mind. BT
That is the key phrase! BT
A good number of my running friends are serious libs and progressives -- and they are quite vocal (in social media) about it. So far, I have had no rebuttal or comments on their posts ... go along to get along. But my patience is getting thin. I suppose that I'm just venting a bit on this here in The Gulch . . .
I just took a quick look at The Five. Saw Miley Cyrus and a brunette celebrity I did not recognize shown trying to encourage students to vote Shillary.
I like to catch the opening of the O'Reilly Factor but I often wander off after that. That's usually when I eat with a TV table.
Sometimes I catch some Hannity on the car radio like today.
I have noticed that FOX has switched to giving Hillary preferential treatment since the last debate. Someone high up was bought off I think and they are trying to be "balanced", whatever that means.
Was noticing him unravel since then.
But to endorse Shillary?
Believe that ties in with what Michael Savage saying about liberalism being a mental disorder.
I have no use Glenn Beck has to say about anything ever again. Same goes for anyone who votes for the evil hag.
Load more comments...