Good to see you Rich!

Unfortunately, regardless of whether Hillary or Trump wins, I foresee skyrocketing taxes and health insurance premiums for all.

Hi richrobinson,
"Wonder what will happen next"
My guess is we will lose more liberty and justice for all.
Regards,
DOB

So, in other words: 'a typical dumbocrat' aka 'low-information voter'

If the statements, accusations, charges, and Etc against Hillaliar are all false?
How come I do not see any slander or defamation of character lawsuits being filed?

I heard trump say he was going to repeal and replace obamacare with something great, really great (not his job by the way, it's congresses). When asked who was going to pay for it he said the government. They are both (the candidates) statist and both will use force and steal from the producers to give to those who produce nothing.

The least emphasized element of Hillary's policies, her positions on taxes, may be the most effective argument against her when dealing with the uninformed. In simple terms, she is not proposing to reduce income taxes on even the poorest among us. While she may screech about "soaking the rich," she's in favor of increased payroll tax, which everyone pays, and is the most regressive tax. She's in favor of a carbon tax, which will affect every element of the economy, making everything more expensive for everyone. She wants to double the tax on capital gains, which she claims is aimed at the wealthy, but anyone with a 401K or IRA will also feel the bite. She wants to increase the estate tax to 65%, which won't harm the truly wealthy, who know how to hide their money, but will destroy farm and ranch families. She wants to increase the corporate tax rate, which will help continue the destruction of small businesses, but leave the big globalist firms relatively untouched.

The immediate impact of Clinton's plans, without even beginning to assess what happens with the "green friendly" regulations she wants to impose, are that they will provide 54,000 new government jobs while destroying over 550,000 private jobs. I have no doubt the effects if implemented will be far worse than these estimates.

I have found that support for Hillary is a good gauge of the people I dont want in my "circle of trust". Its like a litmus test for the real inner workings of a person.

So I am removing from my "circle of trust" all people who say they are voting for Hillary. I will still deal with them, but only at arms length. I wont trust them to support my rights at all.

I have two friends who are equally ignorant of Benghazi and the impact of Obamacare on their doctors, but are going to vote for Hillary. Their primary news source is NPR.

That's because Hillary is relying heavily on the "useful idiot" population to propel her into office. These are the people who want something from government regardless the cost to either the wallet or personal freedom and the people who are ignoramuses and don't get informed about the issues. These people can be frustrating to deal with, but not nearly so the ideologues who actually buy into the rhetoric despite the ramifications. My brother is one of these: he just can't believe that Obamacare is collapsing even when I show him the proof.

The problem with liberals is that they do not pay attention to facts. They cannot wrap their head around truth, they only believe their talking points and never do any research into the basis for those points. If you confront them with facts, they simply go back to their talking points and never listen.

I guess I might have asked what policies of HRC was he voting FOR. What about the current state of affairs is positive for the customer?? Maybe, just maybe, getting such drones to think, even briefly, can get them to not vote for HRC -- maybe not for DJT.

Some people spend more time researching a new phone than they do a presidential candidate. They sure know more about reality TV than the person that is supposed to be running the country for the next 4 years.

Funny, those devoted to hiltery, who's policies depends upon whom she is speaking to, do not realize what her policies really are; yet, they know not that they'd be in favor of trumpet's policies, policies and concerns that have not changed with the audience, had they just listened.
Whether one likes trumpet of not...there is nothing to like about hiltery, she is not worthy of any consideration at all...not even for bathroom monitor in kindergarten.

I am still voting for myself...care to be my VP?

I blame the media for the result that emotional, feeling responses suffice for a justification of a position. A valid form of argument with true premises and eveidence supporting the truth of premises asked by me, and you apparently, gets blank stares. Compulsory education and reality shows have done miracles for this media driven oligarchy. The reasons, IMO for the country's increasing divisiveness is in the loss of respect for reasoning in any form. Please help me out of these depths of despair up to the level of cynicism. Anybody.

Typical low information voter.
Next time you see him, ask him if China should pay reparations for attacking Omaha Beach during--
Aw, pick a war. Any war.

"Why climb Mount Everest?"
"Because it's there."
Why vote for Hillary?
Because she's there and she's a Democrat.
Counter: But she's a liar -- a treasonous liar at that.
She has become rich from the very people she claims are against the people she defends.
"I don't know anything about that."
What is worse than stupidity? Adamant stupidity.

From my observations it seems that those planning to vote for Hillary are doing so for feelings. Whereas those planning on voting for Trump are doing so because of the issues.

Not saying anything about the validity of these feelings or issues either way. Just an observation.

Me personally I will go with issues and mainly it is my issues with the Clinton's as a whole and Hillary in particular. While I see Trump as a Red Neck's wet dream and a blowhard. I see Hillary as PURE EVIL!

Absolutely common today. People vote like religion in the direction they they they'll look the most cool.

There shouldn't be govt oversight of trade deals. that is not capitalism. free people trading freely.