Sold Out: How High-Tech Billionaires and Bipartisan Beltway Crapweasels Are Screwing America's Best and Brightest Workers

Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 7 years, 9 months ago to Books
36 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Sold Out: How High-Tech Billionaires and Bipartisan Beltway Crapweasels Are Screwing America's Best and Brightest Workers
Book Review
Authors, Michelle Malkin and John Miano ISBN 978-1-5011-1594-3 336 pages including appendixes, excluding approximately 100 pages of notes/citations and the approximately 20 page index.

Our visa system is broken. It is a tool for big businesses and political cronies to get rich from the power of pull, not production. Despite the constant propaganda there is no shortage of American workers with STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) degrees. Despite the rhetoric that they are all trying to look out for American workers and create more American jobs, the truth is the complete opposite. They are interested in American jobs all right; they are interested in stealing them, outsourcing them and undercutting the wages.

The H1B visas are being used to bring in foreign workers as indentured servants, to force American workers to train their own replacements before being given pink slips or face being fired and risk their severance pay and unemployment benefits. Most are being forced to sign non-disclosure agreements also in order to receive their severance and layoff notices. Many of these foreign workers are not highly skilled, are actually holding worthless pieces of paper from overseas diploma mills, and are paid far less than the workers they are replacing. Once trained, the foreign nationals are often sent overseas along with the jobs to nations with lower wages and regulations. The politicians are pressured and rewarded with big contributions by the Industry giants; they have a vested interest in increasing the number of visas and ensuring that there is lax enforcement and data collection regarding overstaying of the visas. The result is depressed wages and fewer jobs for American workers.

Even the F1 visas (student visas) are sources of vast amounts of corruption. Fake colleges and universities have cropped up all over America in order to attract foreign "students" for a fee, going so far as to promise green cards and immediate job opportunities contrary to law. The corruption is rampant and massive. Many come here with full knowledge that they will not have to attend one single class and be free to take whatever jobs they can find, so long as they pay the "school" its annual fee in order to avoid being blackmailed and turned in to the INS for deportation. Many take even low wage and entry level jobs, so it is not just the highly educated Americans that lose opportunity, it is also the poor and less educated that are adversely affected.

In all cases the Sword of Damocles is held over the heads of the foreign visa holders. If they complain about their wages or indenture to their employers, since they are required in many cases to work for them for a number of years, they face deportation. Many if not most are lured here under the false pretense that they will eventually be granted a green card, if not citizenship. Even though the government record of tracking and deporting overstaying of visas is a joke, the threat of deportation when initiated by the sponsor is real. It seems this is the only time the INS will actually act, because they do virtually no investigation and tracking on their own, which is the way the cronies want it.

The astounding and horrifying list of players range from big businesses like Microsoft, Intel, Disney, Apple, etc., etc., the politicians from the Gang of Eight, and a legion of others.

Dear reader, this book is not an enjoyable read. It reads like a dry report of cases and statistics so voluminous that it is difficult to get through. Were it not for the wonderful word-smithing of the authors and the occasional personal stories of some of those directly affected it would be unbearable as well as depressing. Nonetheless, I would recommend those that can handle such dry reading to give it a try, but be prepared to be outraged, yet empowered with the facts.

Respectfully,
O.A.

Addendum: It is a generally excepted principle among the best economists that outsourcing is mutually beneficial to the economies involved. It is so, as long as it is done along laissez-faire principles. It is not necessarily so when it is the result of crony capitalism and political entrepreneurship as apposed to economic entrepreneurship. That is the main premise of this book and my concern.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 9 months ago
    Thank you O.A. the above is more of the same to:
    Create a mass of people dependent on the govt for their basic needs. No job , no work. Vote for food is akin to slavery. I recently posted discussing the danger of a rapid, govt mandated , large increase in the minimum wage and the resulting servitude. Another job killer.
    Wage control like price controls are always a long term disaster. Free market pricing is the only mechanism that promotes growth and provides for higher pay for greater skill and value.
    I visited with a friend who recently quit his job of electronic testing and repair of an aerospace deicing product. FAA and Fortune 500 Corp. type of bureaucracy at work.

    When entering the main room to start his day of labor there was a large sign that just said OBEY.

    First of all he worked with many Asian immigrants and he said they were very reluctant to stand up for themselves from management abuses. He quit because mgmt kept asking him to do training and higher level repair work at his lower pay scale He said that he would be happy to do at the pay scale for said work. They continually requested and he would not buckle. Then mgmt sent him to H.R. Dept for a talking to and according to my friend when he refused their order to train a higher paid technition at his lower wage,
    he stunned them by saying "I quit". They didn't know what to do.

    O.A. I never thought when I was much younger that our elected leaders would blatantly destroy the economic engine of our country . Now it is rarely out of my mind.

    With much respect to you,
    Dobrien
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by blackswan 7 years, 9 months ago
    When talking about the labor market, we run into a host of issues. First, the worker has NO "right" to a job. He or she works at the convenience of the owner/manager. Second, the visa programs should not have quotas. If someone has skills, he or she should be able to enter the country freely, no matter how many there are. In fact, if it was open, the indenture issue would disappear. Further, if labor cost was the only issue, the companies are free to move to the low cost countries already, and they don't have to issue visas at all. This reminds me of the spectacle of workers smashing Japanese care in decades past, because the Japanese were taking market share away from Detroit. What was ignored was the fact that Detroit wasn't keeping up, and their lack of competitiveness was causing the losses. If the Asians were as incompetent as inferred in the article, we wouldn't be concerned about Chinese, Russian and other hacking of our most sophisticated systems. The plain truth is that the entire world is becoming more and more competitive, and crying about it won't change that. What we need to do is to BE as competitive as we think we are. THAT's where the rubber meets the road. Getting the government to change the rules won't change things. Getting the government out of the way will. Why should you have to get permission from the government to hire someone you want?!? THAT's the problem. The companies are asking for a larger quota. Why is there a quota at all?!? This entire immigration issue needs to be eliminated completely; one way to resolve it is to have immigration deals with China, Mexico, India, etc., where, if their people can come here freely, ours can go their countries just as freely, and can set up businesses and do whatever is allowed here in the US. Rather than having a one-way deal, let it be two-way. Then we'll see who cries the loudest.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 9 months ago
      Hello Blackswan,
      If only it was being handled that way. The most qualified workers are not the ones always replacing the existing workers. In many of the documented cases the qualified workers are being forced to train inferior workers to do their jobs and once trained the companies are setting up shop in other countries and moving the businesses there. In some cases it does not work out and the companies realize too late. This is no help to the displaced workers though, since by then they have moved on or the company is no longer in a position to hire them back. Instead our government has interfered in the labor market and made rules that do indenture the foreign workers.
      Yes, the government is the most responsible player in this crony game. They set the stage and the rules.
      Respectfully,
      O.A.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by Hot_Black_Desiato 7 years, 9 months ago
    Te philosophy of our government over the past couple decades follows the belief that population, creates wealth, that sheer population creates consumers, that feeds and grows the economy.

    Nothing could be further from the truth. Population and available workers does not create demand nor does that create jobs or wealth. Simple volume of consumers does not create sales or wealth or jobs.


    Production and productivity of the individual does. Government, Pelosi and Democrats have said over and over, Unemployment programs, and welfare are the biggest and best way to grow your GDP and grow the economy. Really?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 9 months ago
    My son has a very good hi-tech job. He recently changed jobs in order to get his new, very excellent position. But, he has a 30 year outstanding employment record and is known for his expertise in a special field. However, he has seen the job market deteriorate to the point where not just new graduates, but people with experience have lost their jobs because of their company's exodus out of the country. He started working at a high-tech firm while still in college and from there to NASA. He was fortunate in that he went on to greener pastures before NASA downsized. Once again I quote the dear departed Walt Kelly, writer, artist, philosopher, who in his comic strip Pogo, made this great comment, "We have met the enemy and he is us."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by KevinSchwinkendorf 7 years, 9 months ago
    This scandal is not just limited to the private sector either. Our federal government (e.g., Department of Energy, or DOE) operates a network of national labs and other sites that comprise the "nuclear weapons complex", or, "the DOE complex" (including Los Alamos, Hanford, Oak Ridge, Lawrence Livermore, Nevada Test Site, etc.). Since the "Cold War ended," professional employment of "experts" has been phased out in favor of the "compliance-based system," where, in order for staff to be "qualified," all you need is a complex set of forms called a "Qualification Card," or "Qual Card," with lots of nifty little check boxes that even DOE auditors can understand (that is, even a bureaucrat can understand whether they are checked off or not). It used to be that everything from weapons design to criticality safety, to reactor physics, was staffed with actual experts who knew their field and how to perform their tasks correctly. "Qualification" was a matter left to your manager, who knew your professional accomplishments (including publication in professional journals, quality of your work as tracked by annual appraisals, etc.), or in the case of "new hires," they looked at your school records, transcripts, etc., and they wanted to hire "A" students and not "C" students. Well, with the new "compliance-based" approach, they don't need "experts," they just need people to sign a form that says they read some "required reading" material, and check off all the boxes (e.g., "I swear that I have read (and understood) the fission process" - really? like what a freshman nuclear engineer was supposed to have learned in NE-101, assuming he didn't learn it in an elementary high school physics class?!). You see, any college graduate who majored in general science could be hired (with a BS degree) and be paid HALF of what an actual expert is worth (say, with a PhD in Nuclear Engineering and a 30-year resume including a publication record). So, lay off your experts (like myself), hire a bunch of neophytes who will sign off on anything upper management wants to do (yes, including safety engineering analysis - been there, done that!), pay the new people half of what you were paying the old people, and cover your asses when it comes time for your next DOE audit (when they ask, "Is your staff 'Qualified'?") with a bunch of Qual Cards, and you pass the audit by definition. I've been out of steady employment for 3 years now because of this crap, and I'm not yet old enough to retire and collect SS (I'm only 57). The idiocy is never-ending...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 9 months ago
      Hello KevinSchwinkendorf,
      This book documents many cases like yours. According to this book and the examples contained within, the laws and rules have been set up to be unintelligible and full of loopholes and legalese. I encourage all that feel strongly about this issue, either way, to read this book and decide how to proceed for themselves.
      Respectfully,
      O.A.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 7 years, 9 months ago
    Thanks OA
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 9 months ago
      Hello DB,
      You are welcome.
      The sad thing is, many of the leaders of these businesses started out as true economic entrepreneurs, but somewhere along the way they became political entrepreneurs.
      Regards,
      O.A.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 9 months ago
        In my book I reference the "Professional" CEO's (chief executive officer - for Michael Aarethun) and their pentient for only perpetuating business, not creating new business and the only way they know how to do that is to use their "Influence" and lobbying. Even if the originator of that business manages to stay at the helm...you still have the problem of being accountable to the board and the majority stock holders. I've said it before...if you make the customer your main focus the the stock holders will make out fine and if you concentrate on innovation, you'll have no need for anti-competitive regulations in your favor.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 9 months ago
    This is a direct result of government, politicians and liberal cronies sticking their noses into business...taken to this extreme it seems the only way to do business is to do business with government, politicians and their campaigns. I suggest one might find government and politicians as majority stock holders if not members of the board of directors in one way or another. It's clear that these creatures have not only created this problem but spread this mindless set throughout American businesses like a viral plague.

    The liberal progressive brain is the most dangerous thing in the universe!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 8 months ago
    "They are interested in American jobs all right; they are interested in stealing them,"
    I have seen the corruption you talk about first-hand, but I reject this notion of stealing jobs. Jobs are not something 1 oz gold coins, of which there are only so many on earth to go around. Jobs are people helping one another for money. The gov't visa system views jobs as coins. You have see if any American wants it before giving this coin to a foreigner. But that's wrong. The buyer is giving money, and the seller is giving work. There're only so many hours of work in humans' lifetimes, but there's no limit to what we might create. I see the corruption in the visa system the same way I see people evading drug and prostitution laws. For better or worse, people want the goods/services and there are people interesting in providing what they want.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ sjatkins 7 years, 9 months ago
    THis is not correct. I have worked as a software engineer and software architect in Silicon Valley since 1980. I have experienced first hand how difficult it is to find and hire well qualified people. I have also experienced working with extremely good folks on such visas that were often lost due to falling on the wrong side of the quota before they could get a green card. Which meant they were sent home from 9 months or more in some cases. For a really talented person you unlikely to see them both come back to the US and come back to your company.

    I have never worked at a single company that paid H1B people less than US citizens with the same skill level and experience. There is simply too much competition for skilled workers, H1B or not for this to work.

    Now there are lower in contractor job shops that bring in people with generally not as good skills and pay them as little as possible and exploit them. But this is not done by the major tech companies and certainly not by "tech billionaires".

    There is no evidence that tech wages are more stagnant than wages in general have been for the last decade or two. Nor do I see any shortage of tech jobs out there.

    I don't know where you get your opinion but it is completely at odds with what I have seen on the ground in Silicon Valley.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 7 years, 9 months ago
      Hello sjatkins,
      This is not my opinion; it is a book review. Your experience is anecdotal. The evidence in the book is well documented and collected nation wide. There are very few opinions in the book. It is filled with data. If you read the book, check the citations and can prove its data is false or biased with evidence as credible as the research and documentation of the book, then you should write a book that does so and I will gladly read it with an objective, open mind and review it. You could make a lot of money. This book was written by credible authors with bestsellers to their credit.
      Even if you do not write a book with a contrary position, but just read this book and can prove it is filled with falsehoods, Please post your findings here. I would appreciate the information and if it can be corroborated, I will state as much here publicly.

      I do not dispute your experience. Clearly there are some cases that are as you say, but that is not necessarily representative of the entire industry or conclusive proof that the documented abuses are nonexistent.

      Respectfully,
      O.A.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 9 months ago
        Was the reference to the "Beltway" the same beltway we associate with the area's around DC?
        I've no doubt this is happening...just try and solve a problem these days by calling one of the companies. If your lucky, they'll speak a few words you might be able to make out otherwise it'll be a frustrating experience and not be able to solve your problem for all your trouble. And that's assuming your speaking to someone in This country.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 7 years, 9 months ago
          Hello Olduglycarl,
          Indeed it is. I considered naming names, but the list was too voluminous. Of course the Gang of Eight are easily identified, but the truth is that the list included the majority of congress and so many lobbyists with familiar names... The list of businesses was also extensive and included Facebook, Google, etc... it would be near impossible to avoid them and still do business in this information age.
          Respectfully,
          O.A.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 9 months ago
          A warning if you go there physically yourself in person. Make double sure your passport is in order or you might not get back into the USA.

          And that's my opinion of WDC
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 9 months ago
        O.A., I am surprised at the authors' opinion (yes, every book promotes a story, even if filled with facts, which all have their biases), but I am even more surprised at your opinion in the review (again, opinions are everywhere). I have not read the book, only your review, so I am basing my opinion on your review. First, there are a number of glaring presumptions - such as the qualifications of American workers in the STEM field. Again, I have not done "official" research, but being a engineer for almost 30 years and having gone through several advanced degrees, let me share this anecdotal information - in the higher level engineering classes (MS and PhD), there are almost no Americans. Mostly Chinese, then Indians. I know of classes (in Boston) that were taught entirely in Chinese, as the only American student was meeting with the instructor separately so as not to "disturb" the class. The quality of many students graduating from engineering and science programs is pathetic. The quality of those entering the "studies" is also pathetic. A kid that used to work for me has now studied for a year in Ohio State, mechanical engineering; next year he is going to be taking trigonometry!!! (should have been 11th grade in HS). Would you rather hire him or a foreign graduate who has learned calculus in HS and solves Laplace equations, which this student will never learn? More anecdotal stories - I had a former adjunct professor from China work for me on an H1B visa - I paid him more than any of my American employees (not much more, to be honest; still), paid for his visa and other expenses and he produced more than 5 people. I wasn't looking for a foreign worker; I just wanted someone that can produce.

        Moving on, isn't it obvious that hiring foreign workers (in high tech) is a result of failing American market of producing a sufficiently qualified and motivated workforce? The problem is not the "greedy" capitalists, but the socialist government. If it wasn't for the foreign workers, America would likely have collapsed already, or gotten much closer to that point.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 7 years, 9 months ago
          Hello Strugatsky,

          I do not work in this field so the comments I made in the review are an expression of the information presented. They are a summary. I have not expressed an opinion as such, only a synopsis of the material.

          I was surprised by the number of documented American applicants that were turned away from some of the larger corporations that were actually advertising for H-1B applicants and discriminatory against Americans (contrary to law) with equal or greater qualifications. There were many qualified Americans working outside their desired fields due to this bias. It appeared as if the HR departments of the firms in question were offering lower wages than would attract Americans as well as brooming older workers that earned pay commensurate with their time at the companies with foreign workers willing to work for less knowing the opportunities and incentives were greater than they could expect in their native countries.

          I do not relish the conclusions, but some of the most egregious events are unknown to the public, yet they are public information because there were so many court cases and large settlements. The reason they are not known is explained in the book and also documented. The cronies on both sides do all they can to keep it quiet and the mass unlimited immigration advocates work in concert with them.
          I do believe it is a matter of socialist government to a great degree. Capitalists are naturally looking for the lowest cost workforce they can find, but government is subsidizing this workforce by virtue of its policies. It may very well be that if they were not doing so, the overall wages of these people would have to be raised to employ Americans by virtue of market forces. If you can believe the stats in this book they are depressed by numbers of foreign workers that accept these jobs for less because they see residence and opportunity in the US as incentive. The thing is, America may not have suffered collapse and maintained its technological edge and advantage if it were not for the outsourcing of the knowledge and jobs. The market would have to bear the costs, but standards of living would be higher. naturally consumers would pay a bit more for our gadgets, but that would be born worldwide. Other nations would be also less likely to steal IP and undercut our manufacturers if the offshoring was not aided by forcing existing employees here to train their replacements.

          I would very much like to get counter evidence and find the conclusions one must draw from the preponderance of evidence presented in this book to be unjustified, but I found the research and extensive documentation compelling. If you read this book and find it is biased and contains falsehoods. I would very much like to revisit this.

          I am an open market proponent as you know. However, I am as strongly against political entrepreneurship.

          If you have time and inclination to read this book, I would love to hear your thoughts and expert opinion/refutation if you can debunk and discredit the information contained within. I do appreciate your input and experience and also wish sjatkins had time to review this book and provide substantive refutation. I am not locked in or rigid on my position. I am persuadable providing I am given irrefutable evidence that the data in this book is inadequate or false.

          Thank you for your input.
          Respectfully,
          O.A.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 9 months ago
            I will try reading it.
            I can attest that H1B visas are not cheap. Not just the lawyer fees, but the time invested and the wait for the person. I can can see only one reason for doing it - if the person is much better than what is available otherwise. That said, being that it is a government program, it is open to abuses, mostly, from what I can tell, of having the foreign worker locked in the employ of one company, who can abuse them, if they wish. Again, the problem is the government - with a free exchange and mobility of people, this abuse would never happen. I can also see the motivation of the authors to skew the statistics (very easy to do with any statistics on any subject) - admitting to the inferior quality of an American worker is not something that they would want to do. After all, how many people will buy a book that says that they suck? A point on qualifications - when a person applies for a job, with a degree from a US university, do you consider that person qualified? The reality is, unfortunately, no. What is a degree in? Gender studies? If the person is black or other "minority," you may as well divide their grades by at least 2, because you know that they were most likely unqualified getting into the school and did not really earn the grades that they received. I've read portions of Michelle Obama's master's thesis - juvenile complains about racism, white people, life in general (while on full scholarship in one of the most expensive schools) and every paragraph had several grammatical errors. Would you hire her? And if you do make the mistake of hiring her, how do you get rid of her? Perhaps the research that they've done is credible, but without mentioning what I have brought up above, it makes it unbalanced and dubious.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by 7 years, 9 months ago
              Indeed. I look forward to your analysis.
              Thank's
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 9 months ago
                O.A., I read portions of the book (available free on Amazon); of course, this is not the same as the entire book, but I think that I got the flavor and the tone all right. The issues about replacing American workers with foreign workers, or outright outsourcing, are quite right. It is certainly happening. But like with any statistic, taking data that fits the narrative is what propagandists do. They mention the 74% unemployment (or semi-unemployment - not working in their field) rate of STEM graduates, but do not talk about the worthless degrees that many of those graduates have, as I've touched on in my earlier comment. The corporations are doing what any living entity, human or animal, would do - they twist and turn to survive. American workers carry a baggage that is often greater than their salary - benefits, taxes, legal fees, dead beats that can't be gotten rid of for years. Should the corporation, or really the owners, just ignore that baggage because these people have families to feed, needs and wants? Should they hire simply based on the workers' needs? Are we to accept the Atlas Shrugged scenario without even putting up a fight?
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by 7 years, 8 months ago
                  Thank you, strugatsky,
                  I appreciate your taking the time. I don't blame the employers as much as the government that has created the paradigm. That said: it is clear from the preponderance of the evidence in the entirety of the book that some are more interested in increasing their wealth through political entrepreneurship (crony capitalism) at the expense of the best employees and customer service. As a business man myself of over three decades, I feel this is short sighted and I am more loyal to the people that helped me make a success of my business and keep it going. Also I feel the politicos are feathering their nests through cronyism. This is unacceptable to me. There is a perverse incentive for them to keep it more expensive to do business here and force employers to choose as they do.
                  I appreciate your perspective and adding balance to this thread. If you read more and have anything else to add, please do so at your convenience.
                  Respectfully,
                  O.A.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 8 months ago
                    O.A., we're in agreement here. I see the issue as this - America used to be "exceptional" because it had a constitution that respected individual rights, including private property, and a forcibly limited government. It is this combination that allowed capitalism, with all its unintended benefits, to flourish. For the past 100 years, this formula has been chipped away at, until the last sets of socialist/progressive presidents, administrations and congresses, have totally destroyed the Constitution and the rule of law. Now, America has become just like the rest of the world - cronies, theft, nepotism, elitism - basically, dog eats dog, but all the time while proclaiming that they "care." Interestingly, AR described that same situation in her first book, We the Living; you either join the parasites, or you die.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by 7 years, 8 months ago
                      Exactly right, strugatsky.
                      I'm afraid we are withering on the vine. Many of these larger corporations are not without skilled workers. The notion that they cannot find workers is not accurate since they already have workers to whom they are giving pink slips, after they are coerced into training their own replacements. The fact is they are simply looking to reduce their labor costs and increase their profit, or are forced to do so to stay solvent. We have a shrinking middle class with stagnant or declining wages, 94 million Americans unemployed or underemployed, the lowest labor participation rate in decades, a 1.2% GDP growth rate and thirty plus years of trade deficits. We have a self defeating practice of outsourcing jobs and destroying our own market. If these jobs were not lost the government would not have to tax the remaining work force so heavily and the spin-off support jobs from these high tech jobs would also add to the economy. If we had a healthy economy with greater employment and rising wages isn't it possible that these Moguls of industry could raise the cost of their products slightly and still make the necessary profit? I believe that if it were so, they would sell more of their products to a larger market, even if, for example, you had to add another ten or twenty dollars to the price of a smart- phone. Something is wrong with this paradigm and the government is encouraging and facilitating this spiral. The one world economy, new world order, globalists are clearly benefiting at the expense of our domestic job market. Something is seriously wrong with this trend and picture.
                      Hang on tight; it is going to be a bumpy ride.
                      Respectfully,
                      O.A.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by strugatsky 7 years, 8 months ago
                        The name of the problem is socialism and cronyism. The bastards on top know damn well that capitalism is the only value-producing system. However, there is no place for parasites in capitalism. So the parasites hold on to their power by feeding the idiots below on the virtues of socialism while allowing just enough capitalism to put some food on the table, chocking it off the moment is springs its head and desires freedom.
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ sjatkins 7 years, 9 months ago
        I trust what I have seen on the ground over 35 years MUCH more than some book. I have no need to read a book contrary to my experience and contrary to what seems sensible. My time is limited. But thanks for the reply.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo