Banned from Breitbart
I've been a contributor at Breitbart for at least 12 years. I used to correspond with Andrew Brietbart indirectly in the late night hours. Today I was banned from all sites because i wrote about the CONSTITUTION and its actual meaning. AB must be rolling over in his grave.
The comments on articles there are managed by the http://disqus.com comment system, with options for logging in through disqus, facebook, etc. The disqus comments are embedded in the breitbart page to look like it's at breitbart. The blocking of users and removal of comments, however, are managed by the website using disqus, in this case breitbart. That is typically done by some 'moderator' associated with the site, who may or may not know what he is doing, in response to someone else's complaint flagging some previous post. They don't tell you that they have blocked your posts or why; you find out later when you try to post. It doesn't mean that editors at breitbart have banned you.
You can easily open a new account either at Breitbart or through disqus, but if the message you posted here is all there is to it, you should not assume that the blocking was a breitbart editorial decision. Contact someone there with a reasonable request for correction. But first look back through your comment history to see if there was some post that could have triggered a complaint.
Is it true that trumpet owns or funds breitbart now?
Why do you make fun of Trump? Would you rather have Hillary as President?
(Sorry to appear casual on this issue; I agree with you that many laws are unconstitutional and should be struck down.)
Shillary's face is transitionally replacing (still for sale) Obozo's face on rolls of novelty toilet paper now.
Same company also offers TP for Trumpet haters. Never let a candidate go to wa$te.
I can only hope that Pence will school him and keep him on the straight and narrow.
"This may come as a shock to some BUT Twitter is a privately owned company, they can allow or disallow whatever they wish on their service. If you can't get this concept I ask you visit an on-line law library and lookup who freedom of speech protects against (hint, Government). If this reality sickens you don't use twitter (or any-other social networking site because they can all do the same)."
I was raised hearing "sticks and stones..."
Much of what is wrong with the world today... people can't handle the truth, or opposing views and want to censor... poor babies.
Regards,
O.A.
Always remember that we, the marketplace, collectively decide which outlets are "mainstream" and we can change that determination.
And Breitbart is not mainstream. They could become so, but only if they behave better than this.
Slippery slope.
Asking government to do something would be a slippery slope. But boycott activity, or equivalently promoting a competitor, is simply other people exercising the same right that the original banner did. They don't have to trade with me; I don't have to trade with them either.
Somewhat related: I just found out about a new competitor with Twitter. http://sealion.club/ -- But DO NOT MENTION this URL on either Twitter or Breitbart or you will get "shadowbanned" there (that is, it'll look to you like your account still works, but your posts will be made invisible to everyone but you).
Today we see 👀 their Evil plan unfold and the deletes stealing more power
https://images.app.goo.gl/nHguURZ9wu3...
https://images.app.goo.gl/gYjSYoKyXfi...
I have posted on this forum about Rockefeller’s UN Green Agenda Lackey from Canada .Maurice Strong on climate 'conspiracy', Bilberberg and population control
Read the full transcript of former UNEP boss and environmentalist Maurice Strong's interview with Leo Hickman
Maurice Strong the mentor to Al Gore. Strongs, Aunt was an immigrant to China from Canada and a vocal CCP supporter. Weird. Strong made his fortune in Canadian oil with Rockefeller’s guidance. Rockefeller had a different future planned for him as Maurice Strong was given a powerful position in the UN. His push for sustainable ( insert fear du jour) development and starting the global climate
Scam . Enslaving US all for a one world Technocracy. The Evil 13 bloodline families really have it in for us. They couldn’t have just lived in their Mansions with a lack of morality and sick actions wallowing in their own depravity . They had to take total control over our freedom and lives . Trump slowed down the swampers for a few years but COVID attacked and Buy-dem and his handler are trying to catch up with the last 4 years ,he signing EO after EO. Plus he is catching up on all the money laundering they were cut off from.$ 2 trillion 8% for Covid relief. $2trillion for infrastructure 5% for roads and bridges. Come on man!
I still have faith that patriots will thwart the enemy. In the revolutionary war Washington lost virtually all his battles till he won. He took a Durham boat across the Delaware River.
I still think that the color revolution with no statute of limitations and with the evident election theft will be a continuing problem and a prosecuted crime . I see things related to the military and Trump that cause me to hold the line.
I expect the duly elected President to return to the office. The best is yet to come! To me that means accountability and prosecution . It has to happen organically. Optics are very important. I can’t be Trump orchestrating this drainage project.
It is a do or die operation and the truth will shine in the light.
It would be a great place to relocate DC and then cut communications forever.
https://www.theguardian.com/environme...
However, breitbart seems to have really gone downhill since then, seem like a lot of people have been banned with zero explanation
1 - Whoopi Goldberg: If We Had Leadership, We Would Not Be Stuck in Our Houses
Comment: Does her (stupid) comments also apply to socialist countries like France, Italy, Spain,, (to name just a few) that are currently under lockdown?
2 - Calls Increase for MSM to Stop Airing Trump Live: ‘You Will Get People Killed’
Comment 1: Is all what is happening worldwide done to put Hillary in power?
Comment 2: So far, they have managed to put half the world population in jail in their own homes...
Comments are just expressing a view, Breitbart banned me for them... Seriously??
I've also seen good comments on Breitabart that didn't violate any policy get removed, just as on ABC News. Readers can flag comments of course but it's moderators who do the actual removing, and don't even get me started on the list of words that can't be used now on Breitbart. For some bizarre reason, you can't use the name "Val" in a comment. You can use the word "killed", but not "kill", so you couldn't easily comment on the book, "To Kill a Mocking Bird". You can say "Jewish people" but not "Jews", which means that you have to get creative when commenting in support of Trump's support for Israel, or expressing disdain for attacks on places of worship. There are many more Orwellian examples of this as well.
Not sure what's driving this but I suspect that "money issues", advertisers leaving, and pressure from entities like Disqus has something to do with it. Meanwhile, Breitbart is now flooded with liberal trolls. A very few try to interact in thoughtful ways but most come to mock, ridicule, stereotype, agitate, condemn, preach and annoy. Breitbart doesn't seem to have a problem with them, despite their presence undermining the conservative sense of community that many once found on this site.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if someone with an agenda bought the site or someone was hired that is far less conservative.
Quora censors me by allowing downvotes to cause what I write to disappear.
Medium recommends nothing but fuzzy, feel good, nobody loses, left wing stuff. My Medium email feed is full of 23 year olds telling me all about the world in glowing, idealistic and totally unrealistic and irrational terms, all the while Medium's editors refuse to let me contribute to any of it's publications.
The Gulch has no penetration, no readership.
Most popular sites I visit are shallow, with posts that concern themselves with the pop news of the day. Even sites that consider themselves serious do so.
So, what's next? Where do you go?
I rest my case.
AJ was speaking to millions whom frequent Breitbart. Even if they are unqualified, if he put his cases well, some might have responded.
I find nothing elite about this group. The proportion of brilliant people to fools here seems to me approximately the same as in the general population.
Load more comments...