14

Dem Party Platform Calls For Prosecuting Global Warming Skeptics

Posted by $ allosaur 7 years, 10 months ago to Politics
52 comments | Share | Flag

PC "thought police" who are at the core of the Progressive Movement now hike their socialist agenda up to one very nasty notch.
The Dems by their shameless party platform for this critical election clearly desire to to become First Amendment trampling fascists.
To jail and/or monetarily destroy all who do not toe their party line must be near and dear to their dark control freak hearts.
To shut down free speech about our wild as a buck sun's evolution, oops, I mean man-made climate change, is but a first deliberate step toward shutting down free speech altogether.


All Comments

  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ah! Thought you were the same person.
    For the longest time I thought khalling was a guy and the long gone Robbie a girl due to knowing a female Robbie.
    Just another day of old dino crashing along through the jungle, making a general mess of things.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    allosaur,
    Ummm... thank's? I haven't written any articles in a while, or posted any book reviews lately. I have commented a bit lately. I often comment on straightlinelogic's articles though; Robert Gore is the author of those articles, and I might add, a fine author.
    Credit where do. :)

    I will have a book review ready and post it soon though. I look forward to your comments.
    Regards,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Me a mean ole' allosaur me would provide "messin' with ya head" clues even though I wouldn't fire anyone.
    A surveillance camera would be prominently for very noticeable aimed at that rest room's door.
    A sigh that states "Big Brother" would hang from that said camera.
    Another touch could be a pair of painted eyeballs that look straight down from above the door.
    Opening the door would be accompanied be a very loud Three Stooges recording of "Woo! Woo! Woo! Woo!"
    Inside the first thing anyone would see would be a sign that says "BWAHAHA!" hung on the wall.
    Should there be a urinal a sign just above it would ask "Don't you need a porcelain pony ride to do that?"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Don't worry my employer has proudly announced conversion of several site restrooms to "gender neutral". No one has a clue if they will be fired if they use it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sir, you sure do talk classy nice to a moody old North American dinosaur.
    Don't know what you may be aspiring to straight line next, so now I will ask.
    Mind if I use any of this information in a post.
    That Oregon Petition has me salivating through my serrated teeth.
    And should you know it's already been posted and about when, please give me a heads up on that.
    Double Respectfully,
    Me
    aka short form of "different lizard"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Being part of the dimtard party platform just made what had been previously discussed all the more through the roof outrageous from my point of view.
    Crazi(er) and crazi(er).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It crazier and crazier crap, but the article seems to have dredged up items we have already discussed here.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by rbroberg 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Klein represents what I understand to be Peikoff's definition of Disintegration in his book The Dim Hypothesis. Her confusion is deep and striking. Anti-productive and possibly anarcho-primitivist or just cultish, she appeals to socialist principles - like many supporters of socialism - by a rationalized emotional rejection of "all hitherto existing society" [Marx] due to an inner rage and megalomaniac appeal to what I would call "cult-messianic politics". Ironically, I am sure that most liberals seeing that phrase would steal it and use it against OUR movement. Such is the psychologizing of control.

    When victimhood is granted ultimate sanctity, we lose all power to defend ourselves against special interests and political control. That's how we lose First Amendment rights. So there are two questions: What victimhood do you subscribe to? (Liberal) OR Do you reject the victimhood cult-mentality completely? The second one is more difficult, well, because, America is a Christian nation after all.

    Are you a climate victim? Sure! We all are! All of us except the CEO, engineers, and scientists in the chemical industry. Oops. I take the 5th.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ProfChuck 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The politicians have already politicized AGW. It is far to juicy a cause for them to ignore. The problem is that politicians think only in terms of regulations and draconian punishment for those that disobey their rules. Part of the problem is politicians pretending to be scientists, perhaps one in a hundred have any understanding of the technical issues involved. However, that doesn't matter. The AGW argument that unregulated behavior could precipitate a global Armageddon is sufficient to establish and retain the real goal, political power. I worked in Washington for 8 years and had a front row seat to the sausage making process. To the extent that AGW is a real threat, and I am not saying it isn't, these people are the very last that one would want in charge of solving the problem and they would destroy those that can actually do something about it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 10 months ago
    This is contrary to the very essence of the United States. The fact that a political party can even THINK to make it a part of their platform is a disgrace. Every Democrat reading the platform and espousing such a thing should be embarrassed to even consider putting it on paper, let alone espousing it. But then, the Dems have sunk so far to the left that no engine no matter how powerful can pull them out of the cesspool that they have constructed for themselves.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 7 years, 10 months ago
    As someone who proudly and accurately portrays the environmentalist argument for what it is in late October in my freshman class every year, I expect to be among the first to be silenced.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Think big fat me will limp-wrist dangle my hands while I open carry today.
    Psst! I've been known to kid around here in the Gulch. .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    For the Obamanation I used to write O=0 quite a bit until I got tired of it.
    Done El Presidente, his majesty, l'emperor and a bunch of other titles for the Oval Office Narcissist.
    Used to write Chairman-In-Chief and Blamer-In-Chief at times.
    Commander-Of -Grief is my latest creation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Perhaps I'm old fashioned. To me if you have a dingle that dangles then your a male, regardless of what you believe or wish other to believe.

    While I don't expect trouble I'm sure its coming my way eventually if these types of things start happening. I've always been curious what happens next anyway...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Why would you write that?
    Oh, well, I'll be going to Walmart a little later.
    Say, I wonder if I'll be feeling like a woman today should I have to go to the restroom.
    Never happened before; but by golly, now I know I have options.
    Thank you Mr. President for your pen and your phone and your lit up Rainbow House at night. .
    Anyone care to see the Washington Monument turned into a pagan phallic symbol?
    It would only require a few alterations with or without a couple of dome-shaped buildings.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo