Yeah, the more you say, the less I believe you. You're just digging yourself in deeper at this point.

Science won't recognize homosexuality as an illness because it isn't...

Where did you read anyone assert that the assault was justified?

CTYankee is inaccurate, however. Men dressed as women shouldn't be an issue since women commonly dress like men nowadays. These were men *pretending* to be women. Another thing entirely. (an example; Eddie Izzard commonly dresses as a woman, but he doesn't try to pretend to be a woman).

Still doesn't justify assault. But it does explain it.
A woman walking alone down a dark alley in a Florida town during spring break, in a bikini, doesn't justify her subsequent assault and rape... but it does explain it.

Yes; they don't want to admit there's something wrong with them, they've been culturally conditioned to believe that there's nothing wrong with them, and therefore they need validation from "normal" people that they are, in fact, "normal".

Pot. Kettle. Black.

By a "science" that won't recognize homosexuality as an illness. More politics than science, methinks.

Diabetes has its origins in biology and genetics, too. That doesn't keep it from being a disease in need of proper treatment. Indulging a diabetic in the delusion that they're normal, and therefore can eat an entire German chocolate cake without consequences is the equivalent of mutilating and perverting a person's body rather than treating that disorder.

And you're being disingenuous... not *all* sexual deviancy is a result of biology and genetics; probably not even most, I suspect. But, you want to hide the majority behind the skirts of the minority.

"you can't yell "Fire" in a theater or public venue unless there is a fire. "

And once again that bastard Holmes claims another rhetorical victim.

Yes... you *can*, per the Constitution. Only if there is property damage or someone is injured as a result should there be any repercussions for shouting "fire!" in a crowded theater that is not on fire.

I'm not a liberal, but you can say anything you wish... in the public arena. The 1st Amendment specifically prohibits the government from preventing you.

grab a dictionary. "typically" doesn't mean "always".

"passing judgement on others because of their looks"... prejudice is a survival instinct. I pass judgment based on looks all the time. But, you go ahead and pet a rattlesnake if you want to. I'm not going to waste time trying to determine if what looks like a rattlesnake is a harmless bull snake; I'm killing the darn snake.

If you don't want to be judged negatively for your looks... then *choose* a look that reflects positive qualities. Choose not to pierce your body. Choose not to use it as a graffiti wall. Choose to groom yourself in a respectable way.

There's a difference between judging somebody because he wears clothes that don't fit, and judging somebody because he doesn't pull his darned oversized, overpriced pants back up over his ass. The former indicates poverty; the latter indicates a lack of good judgment and weak character.

When you say "it is against nature," what are you referring to, exactly? Pornography or transsexualism? The way you worded your sentence was unclear.

For some reason, I have a sneaking suspicion that you're not giving me an accurate picture...

Transexualism is a scientifically recognized medical condition with verified origins in biology and genetics. It is not a "denial of reality." Do some research on a topic before you speak out about it. :P

So the way people dress justifies assault?

Muggings typically occur in back alleys, not on crowded trains.

That depends on how well a transgender individual blends in with the rest of the population. Most do typically try to present in a way that is as gender normative as possible, though some can't pass even if they wanted to.