Thank You, Mr. Trump, by Robert Gore

Posted by straightlinelogic 9 years ago to Politics
76 comments | Share | Flag

There has been no shortage of commentators pointing out these facts—for years, even decades—but by definition, even if their audiences were in the millions they were “fringe.” Back in late 2014, immigration reform—a “path to citizenship,” de facto amnesty, and meaningless promises of tighter border security—was the prevailing mantra, chanted by both parties’ candidates, endorsed by all right-thinking pundits as necessary to secure the increasingly important Latino vote (support from Republicans was paradoxical—most immigrants vote for Democrats). There would be no immigration issue because dissenting views were marginalized or suppressed, and the “solution” to the problem was a done deal regardless of who was elected.

Then Donald Trump called Mexican immigrants rapists and proposed building a wall at the border, funded by Mexico. The epithet and proposal were outrageous, but the concerns of millions of Americans had been ignored or dismissed as racist and xenophobic. It took something outrageous to get those concerns on the table and force the Cloud People to pay attention. They did so not out of any solicitude for the unwashed, the Dirt People, but because Trump jumped to the top of the polls. Immigration will be a front burner issue through the general election, and attacks on Trump supporters by Mexican-flag-waving thugs will only help his cause. He doesn’t even have to say: “What did I tell you?” It’s implied.

This is an excerpt. Please click the above link for the full article.


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    the old desks had an inkwell receptacle. The girl ahead of me had thick long hair in single long braid. I found she would notice if it put it in my ink well. Then reaching underneath slid a pencil cross wise. I imitated searching for something int he desk while paying attention to teacher and the victim when she moved forward it jerked her head back and I slid the pencil out.
    "Wow your hair got caught in my desk! slamming it closed. Except for the time the teacher was standing behind me. We would get paddlings back then. ......Some years later she said she knew what was up but waited for the best moment when the teacher was in the back of the classroom. OUCH! Second Grade then I got one from the Principal and one from the pater at home. Cured me until fourth grade.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    and then there was the fun of dipping the blonde hair
    in India ink. . such fun! . one of my personal favorites
    was a little gizmo which made a siren sound. . first, a
    long-distance whirr, then a whoosh! -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    ahhh! . clear at last! . we called it "shooting squirrels"
    and got caught, every now and then. . silliness! -- j

    p.s. the charged capacitor in the back of the neck
    was a favorite.
    .
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by coaldigger 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Consumers pay for everything. Businesses do not pay taxes, they collect taxes in the price of their goods and services and pass them on to the consumer. Consumers pay all costs concerned with production and service plus overhead and profit. If the consumer thinks the price is too high, he votes with his pocketbook to close the business. When the government "gives" money to those that did not produce a marketable good or service it has trades something of zero value (money as a means of exchange based on nothing produced) for someone's good or service that had value based on production. Sooner or later this becomes evident as inflation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Which brings u an unanswered question on the same subject. Tariffs. Shirt costs $20 from a South Carolina grown, milled, woven, cut and sewn producing system. Same shirt same quality from India is $10.

    SC seeks a tariff of $10.

    Assuming it's granted the consumer now must pay $20.

    If they buy the import $10 goes to the government
    If the buy local $10 goes to the SC system.

    The question is who loses?

    This is from Hazlitts Economics in One Lesson which all of you should have on your desk.

    the anwer which no one posted is. All the othere businesses who didn't get the benefit of that extra $10. That's the question that's never asked when any form of taxation is proposed . Who loses?

    You want $15 minimum wage TANSTAAFL no free lunch whose money pays for that increase? And whose business does not get that money as a result?

    Works on any and every form of taxation.

    Ask your Congressional that when he or she comes looking for votes? Maybe? Or his her campaigners are out passing leaflets?

    Duuuuhhhhh is the answer you will get. The true way to put that is inflation results.Devaluation follows. WoW! it's another housing bubble and ethanol scam crisis!!!

    Ready to see yiour buying power take another 30% uncovered by COLA nose dive?

    Support $15 minimum it's a direct route to exactly that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    no worries I thumbed you up. Now there is one helluva of a good reason to support Johnson open up those doofus debates and get him a debate coach. Free the voices of America!
    Showing suipport now does not couont as an election vote. My next ugov poll and the one's on town hall etc. now get a libertarian boost

    Great point and thanks for that
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    With the 50 yard slips they couldn't fit under the desk. Corky was the nickname of one of them but it involved a pneumatic adjustable girdle. remember them. and they somehow got deflated when she sat down from doing a board problem in some class or another. her BF was the culprit. The weapon of choice was a few tacks bulletin board type, and he eventually paid the penalty some decades later. That girl could carry a big time grudge.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    you were looking under skirts of girls seated at the
    desks? . you got fifty slips to go to the yard and seek
    forgiveness in solitude? . Corky was the name of one
    of the girls and she caught you and beat you up? -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    That would have been rough. Two other Americans and I bought a caraca (small room) for $115 (for life), hire a heroin addict for five "papers" of smack to build bunk beds. He found the wood, built a three level bed, scrounged some mattresses (they were not as bad as could be imagined), put in a shelf for cooking on the hotplate for total compensation costing us about $6 for labor and material. Did great work, too.

    Compared to what it could have been, it was, as I said, a great adventure.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    In the old Canal Zone days the carcel in Colon local jail hosted some undergoing your experience. The detainees and prisoners alike had to be on their feet all day. No sitting or lying down. At night for fifty cents they could rent a sheet of what we call butcher paper. about six feet long for a bed. Anything else had to be delivered minus the officials cut or mordida by a family member.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    so we keep all of you until investigation is over.

    Which is what they did. Nevertheless, it was a hell of an adventure. Got to watch a few people die, two by stabbing, a few by overdose. Heroin and grass were plentiful because stoned people don't cause much trouble. Alcohol, cocaine, and "uppers" were harder to get because users might do something that would cause problems. And I might mention, it was as capitalist a society as you could find. Everything was available for a price, the suppliers were plentiful and negotiation was a way of life.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    The difference in codes is

    Innocent until proven guilty unless it's an arrest by an excepted bureaucrat set of rules with their own police and courts or under 'suspicion of' laws.

    Napoleonic is Possibly Guilty until proven Guilty and also possibly innocent so we keep all of you until investigation is over.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    That episode in my life was during Nixon's "Operation Cooperation," where the US and Mexico were going to stop drugs by making sure anyone caught with dope (in my case, four joints) would be processed through the Napoleonic Code. I was charged with "trafficking," had to swear I was an "addict" and the process took seven months."Que dice el Juez?" "Delito absuelto" and I was released on January 12, 1970. Very interesting time in Pententeria Del Estado de Baja California
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    hoew can you get more anti establishment than calling for a Republic form of government with two or more parties and free/open/honest elections under the Constitution?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Now we're getting to the nitty gritty nub of things. Let's see the military opted out of their responsibility so I guess that just leaves....hmmmm....well I'm already there. We're you gonna duck and cover?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    No comenta! Something I try to impress on visiting gringos you left whatever you thought were your rights behind when crossing the border and not much of those left before crossing. Guaranteed though the accomodations are nowhere near as nice as the one's back home. The rest is how much mordida you can afford to pay.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hot_Black_Desiato 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Yup. McCain was a MORON and as soon as the conversation came up about public vs. private funding, I knew Obama was going to screw him over. I mean really. Anyone with half a brain knew that was going to happen. I have NEVER checked the $2.00 donation on my taxes....and will NEVER since I have zero idea what that will really be uased for.

    If you review the government finances, Clinton, "balanced the budget" by raiding Social Security and issuing government IOU's there was never a balanced budget, it was the single biggest theft in world history.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo