Judge gives the prize issue to Congressionals. One of two things next. Two Articles Discuss the almost 200 million dollar misappropriation ...theft to you common people.

Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 7 years, 11 months ago to Politics
2 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

https://jonathanturley.org/2016/05/12...

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WINS HISTORIC RULING IN CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE UNDER THE ACA
by jonathanturley

800px-Capitol_Building_Full_ViewThis afternoon, Judge Rosemary Collyer issued a final ruling in United States House of Representatives v. Burwell, the challenge to unilateral actions taken by the Administration under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Judge Collyer ruled in favor of the House of Representatives and found that the Administration violated the Constitution in committing billions of dollars from the United States Treasury without the approval of Congress. The historic ruling reaffirms the foundational “power of the purse” that was given to the legislative branch by the Framers.
Read more of this post

Obamacare Suffers Major Blow With Subsidy Payment Strikedown

Katie Pavlich

headlinestorypic

U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer has ruled the federal government has been unconstitutionally paying out certain Obamacare subsidies/reimbursements, which House Republicans sued to stop.
[Keep Reading]

AND THIS ADDED


BREAKING: Obamacare Suffers Major Blow With Subsidy Payment Strikedown
Katie Pavlich
Posted: May 12, 2016 1:10 PM
BREAKING: Obamacare Suffers Major Blow With Subsidy Payment Strikedown

U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer has ruled the federal government has been unconstitutionally paying out certain Obamacare subsidies/reimbursements, which House Republicans sued to stop. The lawsuit, filed in July 2014, argues the Obama administration is illegally spending money that was never allocated by Congress.

At issue was a $175 million program authorizing payments to insurers that Republicans claimed were not appropriated by Congress. On the question of whether the money could be distributed anyway under another program, Collyer wrote in her opinion: “It cannot.”

“None of the Secretaries’ extra-textual arguments – whether based on economics, 'unintended' results, or legislative history – is persuasive,” she wrote. “The Court will enter judgment in favor of the House of Representatives and enjoin the use of unappropriated monies to fund reimbursements due to insurers” under that section.

Collyer said the law is "clear," and money was not allocated for that program.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepav...


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
    This could mean Biden taking over and running for President. It could mean a lot of a things. Or the rug cleaners and under side sweepers could arrive.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 11 months ago
    Obama will be indicted (impeached for theft of public funds. )

    Obama will claim an out using the 'to the best of my ability clause of his oath of office and shoot his legacy in the foot twice.

    Judges ruling will be overturned.

    If the go by the Constitution he may not use pard on in an impeachment trial for for himself.

    Way to go dim wad!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo