Trump Campaign Falters in Georgia Delegate Elections

Posted by $ nickursis 9 years ago to Politics
92 comments | Share | Flag

Here is a good example of our broken system, between the Wyoming escapade and this one. I know a lot of people don't like Trump, a lot do not like Cruz, but this system is not "democratic" by any means. It should be straight up votes of people, not "here's our pick, lets vote".Republicrats are just as dysfunctional as Democraps.


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    But then it means the notion of corrective punishment or retraining is impossible by definition which means jail forever or capital punishment. Recidivism Rules otherwise. Guess that knocks the social workers and liberal non thinkers ideas out of the ball park.

    I can live with that!

    I'm a supporter of the fly swatting punishment. if society decides the fly is bothering their picnic too much swatSWAT. After all does it matter? They will never learn and it won't change other flies but THAT fly will never bother another picnic.

    Think not reader? What was the name of the last fly you Black Flagged?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Well that describes most of us. Military Retirees but I don't think that's much of a lobby. I'm also a retired union member but don't support them at all, Over 65 but refused that organization too. How about expats?

    Got it. US Citizen and Constitutinal Centrist by belief ...no organization though.

    Well that just leaves citizen of USA but that doesn't apply any more etiher.

    Guess I don't qualify as any special interest.

    No I forgot the best non-organizatin of all. Resident of Gulchville, Somewhere USA with mail forwarded from Bight, ME. LMAO
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I am not opposed to ex-felons voting, other than the fact that they ARE ex felons indicates they did something so bad as to require a special descriptor. I believe the original idea was bad people should not be allowed to add bad ideas to the mix, but then, that would eliminate virtually all politicians, so go for it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Special interests are those that are groups (not individuals) or individuals with influence/money, who purport a specific agenda irregardless of the damage it may do to others. Usually represented by Lobbyists who are provided excessive amounts of money to contribute to elections, and thus we end up with bought and sold candidates who say one thing and do another (whatever the special interest who funded thier election wants). BS.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I mean a very small 'd' democratic meaning for the reasons stated. and NEVER a large D of any kind. I don't believe in representative democracies as a practical part of a Republic excluding by their own choice or the current laws those not registered to vote.

    Not registered to vote clearly indicates a basic disinterest though I may not be stating this in as exact a fashion as I wished.

    I am not a fan of mail in votes nor mailing out ballots to non verified addresses as their is way to much room for voter fraud. Oregon is proof of that. They have no interest in a being a true democratically selected representative or sub Republican form of government in the Oregon Collective.and are a major embarrassment to those in favor of a free system of government with their pseudo charade.

    As for Chicago who can believe anything from a town that gave us Obama.

    I do not disagree any of what you stated.

    As for former felons the answer is not rocket science. If they have completed their sentence they are re-admitted upon application to the general body politic by applying and that is a simple request to register producing such papers as are issued t show successful completion of sentence. It does not include any form of partial, non-completion nor requiring any form of parole or supervision.

    If states like Oregon can deal in whole sale voter fraud with no means of verification then re-instatement of former convicted felons should not be barred.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Started by any citizen but requiring a number of verifiable citizens signing as for special interest define that term. i would just say open to all citizen legally resident in the area concern..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I assume you mean democracy in the general (one man, woman,child, dog, cat) variety. That is one of the current issues that most people have issues with, the lack of any checks and balances as well as verification. The use of mail in, electronic, and "no verification" voting is one reason the Dumbocraps will win this year, it is pre ordained, when you can have the dead in Chicago vote multiple times and anyone in most staes with mail in, can register and their ballots go to political people who "count" (or recount) them their way. I would say your representative democracy also needs to have strict voting requirements, as well as "the body must vote", meaning you have to go to a poll, prove who you are and are qualified, and then fill out the ballot, of which you can have a copy. Representative Democracy falls apart when the system to select them is bent and twisted. The "make it easier to vote' program just enables all those who are too lazy or even non existent, to pollute the method.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree, recall can be a powerful tool, but can also be abused . I would limit recall petitions that can only be started by individuals, and can have no direct funding from any group, to limit special interests.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Suits my purposes but the party does not have to accept them. States may suggest but they have no power to control who or whom a party selects as their candidate. Party selects, Electoral College confirms so to speak. Popular vote is at best a guideline which may or may not be used. Winner take all is outright theft.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I would add a move to ensure all states had recall and it be extended to include all delegates to the federal congress by making them employees of the State.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by KCLiberty 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, democracy is evil and thus advocating for it is evil by association.
    I'm speaking of course about majority/mob rule without a check on those voting. Not representative democracy which has inherent checks and systems of recall and veto. I don't trust most Americans to know the basic premisses of government or history or science for that matter. Why would you trust them to vote with any scruples or logic?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Little confusion in the first sentence.

    Do you mean' advocating' is an evil idea?

    Or do you mean democracy is an evil idea?

    Or do you mean 'advocating for democracy' is an evil idea.

    Thank you in advance for the clarification.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    You are wrong about the states deciding. At best they try and influence but the right to decide how delegates are selected belongs to each political party and no one else. Other than testing the winds the popular vote is the most useless. Always been a lot of whining about it but no one has had the balls to walk the walk and do something about the electoral college system for one. For two not only should the parties have the right to select their own delegates without interference they should also pay the cost especially the costs of appearing on a ballot. Their business their billing.

    Time they quit sticking all of us with the check
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by KCLiberty 9 years ago
    You are advocating for democracy, which I think is an evil idea. I'd rather people involved in the party have more of an influence than every shmuck moron that barely has enough intellect to vote. I am not a Trump or Cruz guy. But, I was involved in the Ron Paul campaign locally. We won national delegates through hard work and being involved. Most morons didn't even know who he was or what he stood for thanks to the media. I don't trust my future to idiots that watch FOX news or think we should bomb brown children because.......just because.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I would agree that the current system needs to go to the scrap yard and start over, I prefer to just fire all of DC and hire some real people who want to work.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Cynical enough to believe and prepare for change by means other than the present system which has evolved into 'an enemy domestic' .

    It does not represent the 46%-50% who don not register and participate at all.

    It does not represent the over 50% of registered voters who now say they will not vote for the top three candidate finalists in the national charade or street theater and number four Sanders gets slightly less than 50% in that category.

    Best way to describe the system?

    "What's it got to do with a constitutional Republic?"

    or perehaps

    "Is that the best it can produce??"

    Cynical enough to look at destroying the present non-system and starting over.

    That's the way I grade a near 20 trillion dollar stated debt a 117 trillion dollar real debt and nothing to show for it.

    Damn shame the military doesn't up hold it's oath of office. Careerists and all.

    THAT's cynical.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    There is no think.

    Then again, that's representative of our single party of 2 names... and those of whom they anoint to govern. No think.

    On one hand, it's evident by what shenanigans they keep pulling on We the People... On the other, it shows how much the "unthink" has become part and parcel of the American Sheep.

    They dictate their will over them, and the sheep bleat their blind acceptance...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Indeed, I do not see you as cynical, things are indeed what they seem to be. When that memo surfaces in a year or two, we will just do a reset and start it all over.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Good post, I just did not find any breadcrumb trail leading to some other option besides a hole with a rock dragged in behind, to wait for the ultimate implosion of the system...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Sounds like the Democrats are running their right wing Republican members in fine style. So much for the left.

    Call me Cyncial Realist
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    And, as Michael and I keep ranting back and forth, they will never do something to simplify and openly be honest in an election. They will promise those smart enough to question, and either mark them to opt into the inner circle or exclude. The majority are just the herd to be herded to the desired conclusion. This is the Republicrat answer to Trump, we will neuter your threat by taking away all the delegates we can, so at the convention, we can get the one we want. I am sure at some point down the road, a memo will be leaked that was sent to all the state party bosses, and everyone will be shocked and dismayed. A sacrificial lamb will resign, and get a job at some company making 500K a year doing nothing, and all will be well again. Call me cynical....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I think sheeple is a perfect descriptor for the behavior you see. Vote for me because I am Republicrat, Democrap or anything else. That may have had some meaning when each party had a clear, different platform and vision. Now you get a homogenized mish mash of "I'll give you" and "I'll take away". The herd is programmed by the media as to what they want, and they then follow the lead. That is the only way to explain a society that will in majority vote for a felon and clear criminal and delude themselves that "she didn't do it" because they say she didn't. Or vote for the Republicrat religious manipulator who will save Christian America, and the vaguely save it in some form from something. I do not choose to support any of them, however, I also would like to see my vote do something beyond a protest no one hears.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo